What makes human typical human Flashcards
allometry
as an organism increases in size, the dimensions of its parts do not increase proptionally
What are the costs of a large brain?
- it is metabolically expensive -> BUT there is no correlation bw brain size across mammals and metabolic rate
- > larger brian will only envolve if payoffs are even greater
metabolic rate
amount of energy used by an animal per unit of time
expensive tissue hypothesis
metabolic requirment of large brains are offset by corresponding reduction of the gut
-> human gut is significantely smaller than predicted by patterns in other species -> need for high quality diet
lifting energetic constraint
1 change in diet to fruit 2 meat eating 3 cooking food 4 cooperated breeding 5 alloparental care
evidence for change in diet
Howler and Spider Monkey
howler ( leaf eater) x spider monkey (fruit eater)
- > monkeys of the same size differ in degree of brain development
- > fruit eating spider monkey has a much better developed and larger brain
What are payoffs that make animals want a bigger brain?
1 Ecological hypothesis
2 social / machiavellian hypothesis
3 cultural intelligence hypothesis
Ecological intelligence Hypothesis
Selective pressure due to change in diet
- > need to monitor the availability of dispersed food supply
- > extractive foraging
- > requirement of mental map in order to find food
- > knowlege when food is ripe
extractive foraging
removal of food items from an embedded matrix
Does lifting constraint or selective pressure lead to larger brains?
higher diet quality leads to an (1) increased energy availabiltiy (2) more complex foraging behaviors and (3) more rapid assimiliation -> smaller gut -> increased energy availability
all these factors end up in larger brain
-> see graph in lecture 3
skills that are distinctly to human
there is something special about social domain ( physical domain monkeys and children are quite similiar )
social hypothesis
= large brains have envolved via intense social interactions and competition
1 Social Hypothesis (Dunbar)
individuals living in a stable social group face cognitive demands that individuals living alone dont
large brains of primates reflects the computational demands of the complex social systems that characterize the order
(-> pairbonded species have larger brains)
-> linear correlation between group size and neocortex
Machiavellian Hypothesis
what differentiates primates from other species is complexity in social life -> requieres domiance rank means who is dominant, is standing above you -> leads to need of face recognition
Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis
argues that humans unique cognitive skills is mainly due to species specific set of social cognitive skills for participating and exchangning knowledge in cultural groups
merging ecological and and social drivers
Ecological factors drive growth brain
Cooperation shapes brain (limited because it is often associated with cheating)
Culture may be crucial to rapid increase in skill learning needed for brain growth
-> three aspects are not in conflict with each other
dominance hierarchies
some individuals consistently able to displace others from the resource -> rank depends on strength , size age etc
stable hierarchy vs unstable hierarchy
stable hierarchy : low ranks have worse health and increased stress
unstable hierarchy : vice versa
social brain hypothesis
idea that maintaing social relationships requires devoted brain mechanisms -> social species tendence to have larger brains -> evidence is found in primates