Cooperation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Group selection

A

describes natural selection operating between groups of organisms, rather than between individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reproductive restraint

A

adaptation that has envolved because it increases likelihood of the population surviving though bad years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

altruism

A

act to promote someone’s welfare even at a risk or cost to ourselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

cooperation

A

groups of behaviors that provide benefits to individuals other than the actor and have been selected because they do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Kin selection ( William Hamilton)

A

evolutionary strategy that favours the reproductive success of an organism’s relatives, even at a cost to the organism’s own survival and reproduction

reason : investing in their children means investing in their own genotype

-> can be applied to any family relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hamiltons rule (formula)

A

states that kin-directed behavior can be favourable by selection wherever ; c < rb ,

where c = cost
r= coefficient of relatedness
b= benefit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

coefficient of relatedness

A

represents degree of allelic similarity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Inclusive fitness theory

A

an organisms genetic success is believed to be derivied from cooperation and acltruistic behavior ( altruism amongst organisms who share a given percentage of genes enables them to be passed on to following generation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

inclusive fitness

A

refers to an individuals direct fitness ( eg number of personal descendants) plus any additional fitness of its relatives which is consequence of its action (eg helping a relative)

direct fitness + indirect fitness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

alloparenting

A

phenomena in nature where individuals under certain conditions invest in the offspring of their parents, rather than reproducing for themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

conditions on Hamiltons rule

A

1 a behavior will not evolve, even if c < rb , if c is too large in absolute terms ( example: allele that results in inability to reproduce will not spread) -> thus rule is only applicable to behaviours with a weaker selective disadvantage, such as foregoing some reproduction under some circumstances

2 coefficient of relatedness alone is not sufficient to predict which behavior will evolve ( example parents at the end of their life will do more to protect their offspring than vice versa) Thus, b and c are not fixed for particular behaviors , but variable depending on the future prospects of the actor and recipient

3 coefficient of relatedness of one animal to another is always less tha the CoR of that animal to itself (which is 1)

  • > ruleis compatible to behavior against own kin as wekk
  • > behaviors that harm kin are particulary likely to evolve where there is local competition between relatives for finite resources
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

In which two situations can cooperation be considered?

A

1 Altruism

2 mutual benefit behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mutual benefir behavior

A

each individual benefits from the activity of the others -> often raise issues cheating and enforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

by-product benefit

A

situations where mutual benefit arises simply from every individual following its own immediate self-interest
-> benefits on another arise simply as a side effect of the benefits of the actor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

direct reciprocity

A

idea that we help individuals who helped us in the past (tit for tat)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which conditions must be met for direct reciprocity to occur?

A
  • benefit of the recipient must be greater than the cost for the actor ( example food sharing : sharing could only evolve if individual B has an amount of food whereas individual A has no food and times where the reverse was true)
  • need to rencounter each other multiple times
  • need of mechanism for allocating cooperation differently to individuals who have been cooperative in past -> prevent cheaters who receive cooperverative benefit but never return

= c < wb ( c = cost, b = benefit, w = probability of recipient reciprocating in future)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Indirect reciprocity

A

idea that it might be advantagous to help individuals who we have seen helping others in the past, even if that help was not specifically directed to us

  • > by helping I might get a good reputation in virtue of which others might give benefit on me
  • > requires great deal of cognitive capabilities ; therefore often not common in animal species

c wher q = probability of having correct info about partners prior knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Green beard effect

A

A green-beard effect gene (or linked genes) produces three phenotypic effects: (1) a perceptible trait — the hypothetical green beard; (2) recognition of this trait in others; and (3) preferential treatment to those recognized.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Are humans really altruistic in the lomg run?

A

it is not clear if contributing tocharities or joint ventures are really altruistic in the long run -> reputational and social beneftis the people might derive from doing so could easily outweigh costs over the persons lifetime

20
Q

Eusociality

A

the highest level of organization of an animal society is defined by 4 characteristics :

1 overlapping generations
2 cooperative brood care
3 philopatry ( individuals remain living in their birth place)
4 reproductive altruism

21
Q

Eusociality society

A

It is ruled by queen, the only breeding female who is larger than the res. The remainder of society composed of a few breeding male and female workers, and the young

22
Q

Haploidity / Kin Selection

A

males come from unfertilised eggs (= parthenogenesis) thus only have one set of chromosomes but females from fertilised eggs thus they are diploid

23
Q

weaknesses of Hamiltons model

A

1 average relatedness between sisters falls off rapidly when queen mates with multiple males

2 males share only 25 % of their sisters genes and in case of equal sex ratios , females are related to their siblings on average 0.5 whcih is not better than raising their own offspring

24
Q

Ultimate Explanations

A

explanations about WHY a behavior exists , concerned with the fitness consequences of a trait or behavior and whether it is /or not/ selected

-> Evolutionary Function

25
Q

Proximate Explanation

A

explanations about HOW behavior works , concerned with mechanisms that underpin trait or behavior

-> Way in which the functionality is achieved ; more interested in research

26
Q

Cooperative behavior ; proximate and ultimate explanation

A

proximate : religion, strong reciprocity, concern for praise and blame, cultural transmision

ultimate : cooperative behavior can be mutually beneficial and can help kin -> either way , greater inclusive fitness follows

27
Q

Altruism ; ultimate and proximate

A

u: to increase ftness of kin
p: fear of supernatural punishment, altruism is caused by feeling of shame and pride

28
Q

Parochial altruism

A

favouring own ethnical, racial group or other insiders over outsiders

29
Q

true altruism

A

behavior increases anothers persons reproductive success while decreasing ones own -> can only envolve through kin selection

30
Q

network reciprocity

A

generalization of ‘‘spatial reciprocity’’ (=study how spatial structure affects evolutionary and ecologicall dynamics

31
Q

punishment

A

presence of punishment for non-cooperation sustains cooperation at a much higher level than if there was no possibility of punishment

32
Q

large scale collective actions

A

make humans unique -> soldiers go to work together

33
Q

Tit for tat

A

strategy : cooperates in first round and then always uses what other used last round
-> nice strategy

34
Q

Tit for tat / forgiving tit for tat

A

2 defections required before person using this strategy gets ‘‘pissed off’’ and detects as well

35
Q

Grudger

A

always cooperates unless the other defects -> then only defects

36
Q

Joss

A

basically Tit for Tat but sometimes tries defecting

37
Q

Tester

A

strategy starts of cooperating and then defects to see what the opponent does to find out their strategy

38
Q

cooperator

A

pays cost c for another individual to get benefit b

39
Q

defector

A

no cost, does not deal out benefits

40
Q

population of cooperators and defectors

A

cooperators -> highest average fitness

defectors -> lowest average fitness

41
Q

kin selection - Nowak

A

r > c/b

-> coefficient of relatedness must be greater than cost benefit ratio

42
Q

direct reciprocity - Nowak

A

w > c/b

  • > prisoners dilemma
  • can lead to evolution of cooperation only if w of another encoutner between the same two individuals exceeds the cost benefit ratio of altruistic act
43
Q

indirect reciprocity - Nowak

A

w > c/b

leads evolution of morality and norms

44
Q

network reciprocity - Nowak

A

b/c > k

  • some individiduals interact more than others
  • benefit cost ratio must exceed average number of neighbours ( k ) per individual
45
Q

group selection / multiple level selection - Nowak

A

Multi-level selection :
selection on the lower level (WITHIN GROUPS) favours defectors wheras selection on the higher level (BETWEEN GROUPS) favors cooperators

b/c > 1 + (n/m)