What I Dint Know Flashcards
Lucas et al 2006
Asked students to give answers to easy and more difficult maths problems
More conformity to incorrect answers when the problems were more difficult. This was most true for students who rated their maths ability as poor.
This is evidence for informational social influence.
Participants in asch’s study
123 American male students
Aschs study - % participants conformed and gave a wrong answer
36.8%
Asch - how many participants never gave a wrong answer?
25%
Asch how many participants conformed at least once?
75%
Asch - conformity to wrong answer with two confederates?
13.6%
Asch - conformity rate with three participants?
31.8%
Asch- conformity rate with a dissenter?
25%
How many participants in the Stanford prison experiment?
24 ‘emotionally stable’ students
How many prisoners released early?
Three
How many days did zimbardos experiment last for?
6
How many days was zimbardos experiment supposed to go on for?
8
Participants for milgrams study?
40 male participants (20-50 years old) recruited through newspaper ads
How many stopped at 300 volts in milgrams original study?
12.5%
Did anyone stop below 300 volts in milgrams original study?
No
How many continued on to 450 volts in milgrams original study?
65%
How many people said they were glad to have participated in milgrams study?
84%
How many people in milgrams original study reported that they were glad to have participated?
84%
How many psychology students did milgram ask to predict the outcome and what did they say?
He asked 14 psychology students and they said that 3% would continue to 450 volts
Milgram conformity rates: proximity variation
65% to 40%
Milgram conformity rates: touch proximity variation
65% to 30%
Milgram conformity rates:
Remote instruction proximity variation
65% to 20.5%
Milgram conformity rates: location
65% to 47.5%
Milgram conformity rates: uniform
65% to 20%
Moscovici and the blue green slides: how many slides?
36
Moscovici and the blue green slides: how many people in a group?
6
Moscovici and the blue green slides: consistent minority condition: on how many trials did participants give the wrong answer?
8.42%
Moscovici and the blue green slides: consistent minority condition: how many participants gave the same answer on at least one trial?
32%
Moscovici and the blue green slides: inconsistent minority condition: on how many trials did participants give the wrong answer?
1.25%
Moscovici and the blue green slides: control group : on how many trials did participants wrongly identify colour?
0.25%
Peterson and Peterson : participants?
24 students
Peterson and Peterson: participants told to count backwards for how many seconds?
3, 6, 9, 12, 15 or 18
Peterson and Peterson: with a three second interval, how accurate at recalling were participants?
80%
Peterson and Peterson: with an eighteen second interval, how accurate at recalling were participants?
3%
Bahrick et al: participants?
392 Americans aged between 17 and 74
Bahrick et al: how many photos?
50
Bahrick et al: how accurate after 48 years when recognising photos?
70%
Bahrick et al: how accurate when free recalling names?
Less accurate than recognising photos
Godden and baddeley: level of accuracy when learning and recall environment didn’t match compared to when they did match?
40% lower
Loftus and Palmer: participants?
45
Loftus and palmer: mean speed for contacted?
31.8mph
Loftus and palmer: mean speed for smashed?
40.5mph
Gabbert et al: how many people mistakenly recalled aspects of the event which they didn’t see?
71%
Johnson and Scott: how many participants in the low anxiety condition could recognise the man?
49%
Johnson and Scott: how many participants in the high anxiety condition could recognise the man?
33%
Schaffer and Emerson: in how many cases was the father the first attachment figure?
3%
Schaffer and Emerson: in how many cases were the father and mother joint first attachment figures?
27%
Schaffer and Emerson: how many infants had formed a secondary attachment with the father by 18 months?
75%
Schaffer and Emerson: participants?
60 babies from Glasgow, most from working class families
Schaffer and Emerson: how many babies showed separation anxiety towards mother and at what age?
50% - between 25 and 32 weeks
Lorenz: how many eggs?
12
Harlow? How many monkeys and what breed?
16 rhesus monkeys
Ainsworth: how many toddler are securely attached in U.K.?
60-75%
Ainsworth: how many toddler are insecure-avoidant in the uk?
20-25%
Ainsworth: how many toddler are insecure resistant in the uk?
3%
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: how many studies?
32
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: how many studies from the us?
15
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: how many children overall?
1990
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: secure attachments in China (the lowest)?
50%
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: secure attachments in Britain (the highest)?
75%
Van ijzendoorn and kroonenburg: how much did results vary within countries?
150% greater difference in countries than between countries
Simonelli et al: participants?
76 12-month olds
Simonelli : how many secure and how many insecure avoidant?
50% secure
36% insecure avoidant
Bowlby 1944: how many delinquents were affectionless psychopaths?
14 of the 44 thieves
Bowlby: how many of the 14 affectionless psychopaths had experienced prolonged separation from their mothers within the first two years of their lives?
12
Bowlby: how many of the 30 remaining thieves had experiences separations?
5
