What do sociologists think of family diversity and plurality? Flashcards
Leach (media and family type)
Described the typical family type shown in media and praised by politicians as the ‘cereal packet image’ of the family
Supported by Oakley and Thorne:
- critical of how the nuclear family has been elevated to a high status and glorified
- comment that it falsifies reality and obscures the diversity of contemporary family life
Functionalists
- preference for the nuclear family
- nuclear family is uniquely suited to the needs of modern society
- other family types are dysfunctional/ deviant
- argue that diversity is minor and basic family features haven’t changed
Chester (a functionalist) (emphasises how family life is transitional)
- most people experience the nuclear family at some point in their life, aspire to it, and family life is transitional so statistics are misleading
- only significant change has been the nuclear family to the neo - conventional family
The New Right
- the nuclear family is the only ideal family type
- family diversity is a product of family breakdown
Benson (member of the New Right) (commenting on the rate of family breakdown)
- analysed data and found that over the first 3 years of a child’s life, the rate of the family breakdown was higher among cohabiting couples (showing that only marriage can provide a stable environment)
Feminists
- nuclear family is based on patriarchal oppression
- critical of the New Right
- family diversity is positive and liberating especially for females who are able to live in units of their choice
Postmodernists
- believe family diversity gives individuals greater freedom to plot their own life course
- society is increasingly individualistic, fragmented and diverse so we have greater choice about our relationships that we can’t talk about a single, stable, dominant family type
Morgan (a postmodernist) (comments on the individuality of families)
- argues that it’s pointless making large-scale generalisations about the family
- prefers the concept of family practices to explain how we construct our life course and relationships
Beck (influenced by postmodernist ideas) (comments on the changes in biographies and society and the family)
- believes the ‘standard biography’ has been replaced by the ‘do-it-yourself biography’
- we now live in a ‘risk’ society
- the traditional patriarchal society has been undermined by greater gender equality and individualism which results in the ‘negotiated’ family
- the family is a ‘zombie category’
Giddens (influenced by postmodernist ideas) (comments on the recent transformations of the family and marriage)
- argues that in recent decades the family and marriage have been transformed by greater choice
- the ‘pure relationship’ is typical of late modern society (no longer held together by norms, religion and laws)
- with more choice, relationships have become less stable
Smart (takes a personal life perspective) (criticises the individualisation thesis of Beck and Giddens)
- the thesis exaggerates how much choice people have, ignoring that traditional norms still impact many people
- wrongly sees people as ‘free-floating’ who can make decisions regardless of their personal relationships in a social context
- ignores the importance of structural factors such as social class in limiting and shaping relationship choices