WF extra info Flashcards
Scats rarely used as forensic evidence
(Trace, 2014)
Disadvantage of identifying species from hair morphology
Need reference samples for comparison
Bird feathers used to identify birds in bird strikes to learn behaviour and avoid them.
(Hoekenga, 2007)
Barbules and nodes (microscopic features) are most useful in identifying by observation.
(TRACE, 2014)
Can gain enough DNA from 2 feather barbs
(Speller, Nicholas and Young. 2011)
Advantages of feathers as forensic evidence
Little needed for DNA analysis
Some very distinctive so fast
Can identify where trade is occuring
Disadvantages of feathers as forensic evidence
Time and expense of DNA analysis
Need reference samples for DNA and morphology
Advantages of hair as forensic evidence
Can identify location - trafficking - palynomorphs, isotopes
Drugs can be detected
Disadvantages of hair as forensic evidence
DNA only with follicle
Need reference samples
Each plant genus has its own unique pollen grain morphology
(Marquez-Grant, N and Roberts, J. 2012)
Treeclimbing irons can link a person to egg collecting as they leave marks in trees.
(TRACE, 2014)
Advantages of eggs as forensic evidence
Fingerprints and DNA can be lifted
Equipment can link a suspect
Disadvantages of eggs as forensic evidence.
Difficult to ID from morphology alone
Need reference sequences for comparison
South Korea has largest market for deer antler products and 8 major pharmaceutical companies produce products derived from deer antler
(Robbins, C. 1997)
Mitochondrial DNA sequences such as cytochrome b are often favoured for DNA analysis as they show greater variation between closely related individuals than nuclear DNA
(Gunn, A. 2009)
Advantages of antlers as forensic evidence
If intact, can tell if naturally shed or removed
Velvet also suggests foreceful removal
Toolmarks can be identified
Disadvantages of antlers as forensic evidence
Tends to be sold in slices
Fraud makes DNA analysis complicated
Advantages of horns as forensic evidence
When intact, relatively easy to ID
Disadvantages of horns as forensic evidence
Diplomats not searched at airports
DNA may be present to ID offender due to force of removal
Raman Spectroscopy requires very little material and is therefore useful for identifying the provenance of carvings
(Gunn, A. 2009)
Advantages of ivory as forensic evidence
Radioisotope analysis
Morphology fairly distinctive
Disadvantages of ivory as forensic evidence
When carved, need specialist techniques
DNA must be taken from the mineral matrix
DNA must be taken from the mineral matrix and it is difficult to extract without denaturing the DNA
(Gunn, A. 2009)
. In 1990, a global ban on the trade in ivory was introduced by CITES and allowed some elephant populations to recover a little.
(Gunn, A. 2009)
2007, elephant ivory worth $850
(Gunn, A. 2009)