Welfare state and mix Flashcards

1
Q

Evidence of increasing UK social spending in recent decades

A

UK social spending as % of GDP:

1974 = 10%
1990 = 12%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Evidence of increasing UK government spending in recent decades

A

UK government spending as % of GDP:

1978 = 41%
1994 = 45%
Today = under 40%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

UK government spending as % of GDP:

1978 = .....%
1994 = .....%
Today = ....%
A

UK government spending as % of GDP:

1978 = 41%
1994 = 45%
Today = under 40%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

UK social spending as % of GDP:

1974 = .....%
1990 = .....%
A

UK social spending as % of GDP:

1974 = 10%
1990 = 12%
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Logic of industrialisation argument for welfare state development

A

Industrialisation + urbanisation – caused wider family ties to weaken + new vulnerabilities, necessitating greater role for state social security

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

‘Weak’ version of industrialisation argument

A

Industrialisation and its correlates necessary to account for welfare state expansion, but further factors needed to explain cross-national variation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Korpi (1989)

A
  1. Data - 18 OECD countries from 1930 onwards

2. Finding – left party participation in government = important factor in development of sickness insurance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Data - 18 OECD countries from 1930 onwards

2. Finding – left party participation in government = important factor in development of sickness insurance

A

Korpi (1989)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Huber and Stephens (2001)

A

Cumulative left control of government positively associated w/welfare generosity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Cumulative left control of government positively associated w/welfare

A

Huber and Stephens (2001)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Kersbergen and Vis (2014)

A
  1. Socialist movement pushed for reforms in Germany and welfare state development under Bismarck = reaction to threat of working-class revolution
  2. Marxist view of welfare state development as ‘riot insurance’ in capitalism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Socialist movement pushed for reforms in Germany and welfare state development under Bismarck = reaction to threat of working-class revolution
  2. Marxist view of welfare state development as ‘riot insurance’ in capitalism
A

Kersbergen and Vis (2014)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Swenson (2002)

A

Major, enduring social policy developments supported by cross-class coalitions of capitalists and workers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Major, enduring social policy developments supported by cross-class coalitions of capitalists and workers

A

Swenson (2002)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Baldwin (1990)

A

Unique features of Nordic welfare states shaped by interests of agrarian middle classes neither to be excluded from benefits of social policy, nor bear excessive costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Unique features of Nordic welfare states shaped by interests of agrarian middle classes neither to be excluded from benefits of social policy, nor bear excessive costs

A

Baldwin (1990)

17
Q
  1. Why might state provision be more equitable?

2. Response?

A
  1. Access based on need (rights-based approach), not ability to pay
  2. State can secure equity through financing and/or regulating welfare provision w/o itself being the provider need not provide itself
  3. E.g. guarantee education for all using public funding, whilst contracting out actual provision to other organisations
18
Q

Milne (1987)

A
  1. Evidence that services contracted out by NHS led to reduction in quality
  2. Spending reductions achieved through lower quality or reduced amount of work
19
Q

NHS CONTRACTING REDUCED QUALITY OF PROVISION

  1. Evidence that services contracted out by NHS led to reduction in quality
  2. Spending reductions achieved through lower quality or reduced amount of work
A

Milne (1987)

20
Q

Evidence that NHS contracting out led to reduced quality of provision

A

Milne (1987)

  1. Evidence that services contracted out by NHS led to reduction in quality
  2. Spending reductions achieved through lower quality or reduced amount of work
21
Q

How does the aim of the welfare state impact desirability of state provision?

A
  1. Rights-based approach - state provision might be best to guarantee universal access
  2. Poverty reduction - blanket state provision may not be necessary and targeted subsidies at poor could potentially be more effective
22
Q

Marmor (1987)

A

Nursing homes consistently provide more cheaply by private sector

23
Q

Nursing homes consistently provide more cheaply by private sector

A

Marmor (1987)

24
Q

Evidence that, in certain areas, state may be a less effective provider of welfare services?

A

Marmor (1987)

Nursing homes consistently provide more cheaply by private sector

25
Q

How to define the voluntary sector?

A

Defined by key themes:

  1. Independence
  2. Non-profit
  3. Voluntarism
26
Q

Advantages of voluntary sector welfare provision?

A
  1. More flexible and responsive, with smaller agile organisations able to better respond to changing needs at local level (vs centralised bureaucratic state provision)
  2. Social capital - voluntary associations created local networks of face-to-face interaction, building civic engagement, trust and norms of mutual support
27
Q

Disadvantage of voluntary sector welfare provision?

A
  1. Uneven coverage

2. Unreliable funding

28
Q

Advantages of informal welfare provision?

A
  1. Ethic of care (personal, loving, caring etc)

2. Free (saves government money…but what about massive opportunity cost + heavy individual costs?)

29
Q

Disadvantages of informal welfare provision

A
  1. Less professional
  2. Financial, personal and opportunity costs for individuals (huge impact on well-being)
  3. Gender inequality of provision