Healthcare Flashcards
Klein (1995)
Reaction to Thatcher’s reforms was “biggest explosion of political anger and professional fury in the history of NHS”
Reaction to Thatcher’s reforms was “biggest explosion of political anger and professional fury in the history of NHS”
Klein (1995)
Wilsford (1994)
HEALTH POLICY CHANGE
- Thatcher centrally directed radical health reforms alongside just 4 ministers, No. 10 Policy Unit and small team from Department of Health
- In many healthcare systems, reform difficult due to path-dependency
- Credibility of Ken Clarke (health minister under Thatcher) helped ‘sell’ reforms to unenthusiastic public
- Radical changes in UK health policy change due to political system + power of PM
- Introduction of management in 80s meant new managers supported Thatcher’s health reforms, which gave them greater influence + control
Evidence that powerful PMs able to shape health policy development alongside small group
- Thatcher:
(i) Launched major review in 1987 TV interview w/o consulting cabinet colleagues
(ii) Centrally directed radical policy reforms alongside just 4 ministers, No. 10 Policy Unit and small team from Department of Health (Wilsford 1994) - Blair:
(i) Similarly announced on TV in 2000 that he intended to bring UK health spending up to EU average as % GDP w/o warning cabinet or civil servants
Who was Thatcher’s Health Minister when radical reforms enacted?
Ken Clarke
How did Health Minister (Ken Clarke) help with Thatcher’s health reforms?
Credibility of Ken Clarke helped ‘sell’ reforms to unenthusiastic public
Who was in ‘inner circle’ that almost single-handily formulated Thatcher’s radical health policy reforms?
Thatcher centrally directed radical health reforms alongside just 4 ministers, No. 10 Policy Unit and small team from Department of Health
Evidence of a Health Minister playing a key role in passing health policy reforms?
King’s Fund (2015)
Secretary Lansley played a “central role” in reforms and was determined to push through legislation so future governments couldn’t “modify/dilute his reforms by administrative fiat”
Secretary Lansley played a “central role” in reforms and was determined to push through legislation so future governments couldn’t “modify/dilute his reforms by administrative fiat”
King’s Fund (2015)
How did opposition from GPs change Thatcher’s proposals for GP fund-holding?
Opposition from GPs + BMA forced Thatcher to make GP fund-holding optional
Evidence of the ‘entrenched professional autonomy’ of doctors?
- Doctors retained professional autonomy – confidential patient relationships + primarily accountable (still) to peers, not managers
- GPs not salaried employees, but independent contractors
- Consultants able to undertake private work in addition to NHS work
Evidence that many managers within NHS supported Thatcher’s health reforms, which gave them greater influence + control?
Wilsford (1994)
Evidence of health spending increases under Blair
By 2007, real NHS spending 40% higher than 5 years earlier due to pledge
Evidence of health spending increases under New Labour:
By ….., real NHS spending …..% higher than ….. years earlier due to pledge
Evidence of health spending increases under New Labour:
By 2007, real NHS spending 40% higher than 5 years earlier due to pledge
King’s Fund (2017)
- Total resources available for NHS broadly in line w/EU average (though below average in per person spending)
- Several resource deficiencies in key areas (compared to EU average):
(i) Doctors and nurses per population
(ii) MRI and CT scanners - Spending on administration and management relatively low compared to EU average
(i) 1997-2010: no. NHS managers increased 37% during period in which total NHS spending doubled in real terms
Which key resource deficiencies did the King’s Fund (2017) identify in the NHS (vs EU average)?
(i) Doctors and nurses per population
(ii) MRI and CT scanners
How does total NHS spending compare internationally?
King’s Fund (2017)
Total resources available for NHS broadly in line w/EU average (though below average in per person spending)
Evidence that NHS relatively cost-effective
- King’s Fund (2018):
(i) based on available data, evidence suggests NHS relatively cost-effective compared to similar countries
(ii) Generic drugs – UK prescribes 1 of highest % of generic drugs in Europe, cheaper than branded rivals - King’s Fund’s (2017) international comparison suggests UK spends relatively little on administration
(i) 1997-2010: no. NHS managers increased 37% during period in which total NHS spending doubled in real terms - Hospital HealthcareCom (2002)
(i) compare costs of procedures in Europe
(ii) >½ cost less in NHS vs 5 European healthcare systems reviewed
King’s Fund (2018)
NHS = COST-EFFECTIVE
- Based on available data, evidence suggests NHS relatively cost-effective compared to similar countries
- Generic drugs – UK prescribes 1 of highest % of generic drugs in Europe, cheaper than branded rivals
HIGH MORTALITY RATES
- Cancer – survival rates below average
(i) Due to later detection and less successful treatments - Heart attacks – morality rates within 30 days of being admitted to hospital below average
(i) Doesn’t appear to be explained by characteristics of patients
Hospital HealthcareCom (2002)
NHS = COST-EFFECTIVE
(i) compare costs of procedures in Europe
(ii) >½ cost less in NHS vs 5 European healthcare systems reviewed
Evidence that spending on administration increased under New Labour? Context?
King’s Fund’s (2017)
1997-2010:
no. of NHS managers increased 37%, but during a period in which total NHS spending doubled in real terms
….. (…..)
(i) compare costs of procedures in Europe
(ii) ….. cost less in NHS vs ….. European healthcare systems reviewed
Hospital HealthcareCom (2002)
(i) compare costs of procedures in Europe
(ii) >½ cost less in NHS vs 5 European healthcare systems reviewed
Evidence of patient satisfaction with the NHS?
BSA (2018)
- ~60% are “very or quite satisfied” with the NHS
- Significant increases in patient satisfaction under New Labour (% ‘very or quite’ satisfied increased from ~40% to ~60%)
….. (2018)
- …..% are “very or quite satisfied” with the NHS
- Significant increases in patient satisfaction under New Labour (% ‘very or quite’ satisfied increased from …..% to …..%)
BSA (2018)
- ~60% are “very or quite satisfied” with the NHS
- Significant increases in patient satisfaction under New Labour (% ‘very or quite’ satisfied increased from ~40% to ~60%)
BSA (2018)
- ~60% are “very or quite satisfied” with the NHS
- Significant increases in patient satisfaction under New Labour (% ‘very or quite’ satisfied increased from ~40% to ~60%)
Evidence that mortality rates for some big causes of death higher than comparable countries in UK
King’s Fund (2018)
- Cancer – survival rates below average
(i) Due to later detection and less successful treatments - Heart attacks – morality rates within 30 days of being admitted to hospital below average
(i) Doesn’t appear to be explained by characteristics of patients
- Potential problems with international survey comparisons of health systems?
- How might this affect survey responses in the UK?
- Responses may be shaped by wider social and political perceptions
- Positive public perception of NHS may skew responses
What 4 types of equity does Le Grand (1982) distinguish?
Equity of:
- Public spending
- Use
- Cost
- Outcome
Who distinguishes 4 types of equity?
Equity of:
- Public spending
- Use
- Cost
- Outcome
Le Grand (1982)
Evidence of inequity/inequality in the NHS
- Le Grand et al (2003)
(i) Strong evidence that lower SES groups use NHS services less than expected based on self-reported illness compared to higher SES groups - Nuffield Trust (2018)
(i) Gap not large, but GP patient surveys show people in deprived areas report lower satisfaction and lower ease of booking appointments
(i) Poorer areas tend to have fewer GPs per head
Le Grand et al (2003)
NHS INEQUITY
- Strong evidence that lower SES groups use NHS services less than expected based on self-reported illness compared to higher SES groups
2a. More confident middle classes better able to articulate themselves to GPs (promoting onward referrals)
2b. Lower SES groups less likely to go to doctor at all and likely to be less confident/more deferential, (leading to lower referral rates)
Nuffield Trust (2018)
GP INEQUITY
(i) Gap not large, but GP patient surveys show people in deprived areas report lower satisfaction and lower ease of booking appointments
(i) Poorer areas tend to have fewer GPs per head
CCG INEQUITY
(i) No statistically significant association between deprivation of a CCG’s residents and variety of indicators (e.g. % left waiting for more than 18 weeks, 4-hour A+E target)
(ii) More deprived CCGs have shorter median waiting times for planned care, though gap = tiny
Evidence of differential use of the NHS based on SES
Le Grand et al (2003)
Strong evidence that lower SES groups use NHS services less than expected based on self-reported illness compared to higher SES groups
Why does Le Grand et al (2003) find strong evidence that lower SES groups use NHS services less than expected based on self-reported illness compared to higher SES groups?
- More confident middle classes better able to articulate themselves to GPs (promoting onward referrals)
- Lower SES groups less likely to go to doctor at all and likely to be less confident/more deferential, (leading to lower referral rates)
NHS choice reforms?
- NHS Improvement Plan (2004):
(i) Greater personal control over timing and location of care
(ii) ‘Supply market’ allows patients to choose from any healthcare provider, w/all treatments funded by NHS
(iii) Enable patients to book appointments online - NHS choices website (2007)
(i) aimed to provide range of data so patients able to compare hospitals, facilitating increased choice
Key elements of choice in NHS Improvement Plan (2004)
(i) Greater personal control over timing and location of care
(ii) ‘Supply market’ allows patients to choose from any healthcare provider, w/all treatments funded by NHS
(iii) Enable patients to book appointments online
aim of NHS choices website (2007)?
Aimed to provide range of data so patients able to compare hospitals, facilitating increased choice
Evidence of extent to which patients aware of choice introduced in NHS?
Dixon (2008)
National patient survey data showed that 61% unaware before visiting GP that they had choice of hospital for appointment
Dixon (2008)
National patient survey data showed that 61% unaware before visiting GP that they had choice of hospital for appointment
….. (…..)
National patient survey data showed that …..% unaware before visiting GP that they had choice of hospital for appointment
Dixon (2008)
National patient survey data showed that 61% unaware before visiting GP that they had choice of hospital for appointment
Greener (2008)
- Patients encouraged to use choice as ‘exit’ strategy from poor service providers
- But reluctant to change GP due to travel distance from home
Why patients reluctant to change GP?
Greener (2008)
Travel distance from home
Evidence of limitations of extent to which choice actually exercised in the NHS?
- Greener (2008)
(i) Patients reluctant to change GP due to travel distance from home - Crinson (2009)
(i) Even in primary form of choice (location of hospital treatment), patients likely to defer to GPs’ judgements - Dixon (2008)
(i) National patient survey data showed that 61% unaware before visiting GP that they had choice of hospital for appointment
Crinson (2009)
LIMITS OF CHOICE
- Even in primary form of choice (location of hospital treatment), patients likely to defer to GPs’ judgements
MANAGERIALISM
2a. Previously doctors controlled every-day resource allocation (thought to prioritise clinical needs over cost control)
2b. Reforms in 80s appointed new ‘general managers’ (non-clinicians) to try to manage performance + control costs
Name and year of Thatcher’s radical health policy White Paper?
1989, Working for Patients
Baggott (1997)
2-TIER ACCESS
GP fund-holding practices found it easier to refer their patients to specialist hospital, exercising greater leverage over secondary care services
Evidence that GP fund-holding created a system of 2-tier access to hospital services?
Baggott (1997)
GP fund-holding practices found it easier to refer their patients to specialist hospital, exercising greater leverage over secondary care services
GP fund-holding practices found it easier to refer their patients to specialist hospital, exercising greater leverage over secondary care services
Baggott (1997)
How were PCTs different to GP fund-holding?
PCTs universalised GP fund-holding, in effect
What are CCGs?
- Clinical Commissioning Groups = consortia of GPs
2. Represent all GP practices in local area
Evidence that “universalisation” of GP fund-holding improved equity
Nuffield Trust (2018)
(i) No statistically significant association between deprivation of a CCG’s residents and variety of indicators (e.g. % left waiting for more than 18 weeks, 4-hour A+;E target)
(ii) More deprived CCGs have shorter median waiting times for planned care, though gap = tiny
Barr (2012)
By 2001, significantly fewer health authorities more than 4% away from amount needed to match resources w/needs equally