Welfare In General Equilibrium - Fairness Flashcards

1
Q

SWF helps us find the utility maximising option.

However what is a fair outcome

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consider 2 cases

A

Giving all good to a single person

Giving 1/n of allocation to each of the n people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Giving all of good to a single person - is it fair, and/or pareto efficient?

A

May be Pareto efficient, but not fair morally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Giving 1/n of the allocation to each of the n people - is it fair, and/or pareto efficient?

A

Fair as distribution is symmetric.
But it may not be pareto efficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

It may not be pareto efficient - upon what assumption is this true

A

If agents have different tastes, and so want to trade from the symmetric allocation. (E.g prefer bananas>apples, due to preference or allergies etc)

So they reach a PE allocation, but may no longer be symmetric.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

So agents with different tastes will reach Pareto efficiency by trading away from the symmetrical allocation (1/n).

Is this still considered fair now? Explain why

A

Yes, if we define fairness as equality of opportunity.

I.e starting with fair allocations (1/n), and everyone has equal opportunity to trade.

No, if only some get the chance to trade.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If some people get chance to trade and others do not.

What may the non-traders experience?

A

Envy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Equity definition

A

No agent prefers another bundle to his own, so no envy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Envy

A

Preferring another agent’s bundle to their own.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fairness definition (2 components)

A

Pareto efficient (no one can be better off without making someone worse off)

Equitable - (no agent prefers another bundle to their own)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How does fair allocation look like on Edgeworth box (pg52)

A

Endowment is in the middle. Both agents get equal split since fair.

Trade is at exchange 1:1 so budget constraint slope -1. (Fairness of opportunity)

Tastes differ indicated by their ICs, and trade at point X (where both IC’s and budget line meet i.e slope -1)

(Diagram is essentially market clearing diagram for Edgeworth box with prices)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How to check if point X fair i.e would A or B want to swap?

A

Swap point is reflection of point X.

Look at annotated diagram for better understanding

But basically swap point is at a lower IC for both people, thus lower utility, and so both would rather keep their bundle, so no envy, so equitable

So the pareto efficient point X is equitable too, thus passing the criteria for FAIRNESS!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What efficiency is always in competitive markets

A

Competitive markets are always pareto-efficient. Since consumers always choose the best affordable bundle.

But we need to show it is always equitable…

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If not equitable… A would envy B. How can this be expressed?

And how can we use this to show that competitive markets are fair?

A

(X¹a,X²a) < (X¹b,X²b)

And since A has got their best affordable bundle (since in a competitive market) , this means A could not have afforded (X¹b,X²b).

But…. It also implies B could not also afford B’s bundle (since we assume A and B have equal endowments)

Therefore a competitive equilibrium with an equal division of goods must be fair.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly