Welfare economics Flashcards
What is a resource allocation
A resource allocation is a complete description of who does what, and who gets what, within an economy
What is meant by pareto superior and pareto efficient?
A resource allocation, X, is said to be Pareto Superior (PS) to another resource allocation, Y, if every individual is at least as well off in X compared to Y, and at least one person is strictly better off in X
• An allocation is Pareto Efficient (PE) if there exists no other feasible allocation that is Pareto Superior to it. Hence a PE allocation is one at which no individual can be made better off without making at least one person worse off. Allocations that are not PE are Pareto Inefficient (PI).
Explain general equillibirum analysis
Used in order to study all markets simultaneously
Allows for interactions between different markets
If we consider two consumers and two goods in a pure exchange economy, i.e. no production
A pair of bundles one for each consumer is called an allocation
AN allocation is feasible if total amount of each good being consumed is equal to the total amount available
x1a +x2a = w1a + w2b
What is an edgeworth box?
Summarises all this information within a simple diagram
Construct a box whose width and height correspond to the toal endownmnet in the economy of good a abd b respecitively
what is efficiency in edgeworth box?
What is the contract curve?
What is competitive genenral equllibrium?
A GCE consists of a set of prices (Pa,Pb) one for each good, such that each consumer is acting optimally given these prices, and all consumer’s choices are compatible in the sense that demand equals supply in each market.
Explain disequilbirum prices
Explain equilibirum prices
Consumer 1 optimum:
MRS1 b,a = -pa/pb
Consumer 2 optimum:
MRS2 b,a = -pa/pb
Hence at CGE: MRS1 b,a = MRS2 b,a ( = -pa/pb)
What is the first fundamental theorem of welfare economics?
In absence of any disortions all GCE’s are pareto efficient
Second fundamental theorem of welfare ecomomics
The Second Fundamental Theorem (SFT) states that if all agents have convex preferences, then there will always be a set of prices such that each Pareto efficient allocation can be established as a competitive equilibrium given an appropriate assignment of endowments achieved via lump sum taxation
An important interpretation of this result is that it is possible to separate the goals of efficiency and fairness (i.e. if the SFT holds both objectives can be achieved – no trade off
issue however are that how does the government know necessary levels of taxation
redistribution is assumed to oocur via ‘lump sum’ taxation meaning taxation that is independednt of any choices agents make
in practice this is rare, so efficiency is endangered