Weight lifter Flashcards

1
Q

Offer curve

A

Demand curve

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

utility function assumptions

A
  1. continuous
  2. strictly increasing
  3. strictly quasi-concave
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Properties of demand

A
  1. Unique x(p,w) which solves consumer problem
  2. x is continuous
  3. x is hod0
  4. exhausts budget constraint
  5. boundary condition
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Boundary condition

A

if own price is zero, demand is infinite for that product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Excess demand

A

z = demand - endowment
Satisfies same properties as demand
Even in aggregate with Walras Law for budget exhaustion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Walras Law in z

A

pz(p)=0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

markets clear in equil if z(p*)=…

A

0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Fixed point theorems

A

Brower’s - single-valued, continuous function has fixed pt

Kakutani’s - upper hemi-continuous stuff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Equilibrium existence proof

A

Probably worth looking into this

for 2 goods can use hod0 with boundary condition, fixed point theorems and Walras Law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

First Welfare Theorem

A

If u increasing, every Walrasian equilibrium is PO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Second welfare theorem

A

any PO allocation can be supported as an equilibrium

requires equilibrium existence conditions: U is continuous, increasing, quasiconcave

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

WARP

A

p’.x(p,w)<=p’.x(p’,w’)=w’ (x(p,w) affordable at p’, but obviously x(p’,w’) chosen instead)
implies p.x(p’,w’)>p.x(p,w)=w (x(p’,w’) must be unaffordable at p)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Law of demand in aggregation if holds for individuals:

A

Preserved by aggregation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

1st line of proof that strict LoD implies Warp in z(p)

A

let p.w=(Ap’).w

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Gross subs implies unique equilibrium

proof involves

A

increasing the price of one good increases demand for another forcing it out of equilibrium

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If z(p) obeys WARP, equilibrium prices are a convex set proof

A

consider p’=tp+(1-t)p**
where p
s are equils but p’ assumed not
applying warp leads to a contradiction of W.L.

17
Q

Price tatonnement

A

rate of change of price pk proportional to aggregate excess demand for k

18
Q

GARP

A

Transitivity

p1.x2

19
Q

Afriat’s Theorem

A

for observed prices and quantities (p,x) the following statements are equivalent
1. the consumer is maximising a strictly increasing and concave utility function
2. GARP is obeyed
3. the following inequality holds for some As, Bs:
As

20
Q

Brown-Matzkin Theorem

A

Can find out if observed wealths and prices are walrasian rationalisable (can be explained by increasing U)

21
Q

D

A

payoff matrix with states on the vertical axis (rows) and securities on the horizontal (columns)
ie if one asset: D=(1,2,3)’
paying 1 in state one, 3 in state 3

22
Q

Dz

A

payoff in each state from holding portfolio of assets, z (containing multiple assets)

23
Q

Incomplete markets

A

Span(D) (rank) less than number of states

there are payoff vectors which cannot be achieved by any portfolio choice

24
Q

Budget constraints in financial asset world

A

x0=w0-q.z
x-0=w-0+Dz
2nd one is a vector

25
Q

Proof that in financial market equil sum of consumption = sum of endowments in each period

A

equil prices set sum of each asset = 0

26
Q

Constrained feasible x-0

A

if x-0=w-0+Dz

27
Q

constrained P.O. if

1WT says

A

there does not exist constrained feasible pareto improvement

1WT says every equil allocation is CPO

28
Q

If markets are complete, CPO allocations are also

A

PO

29
Q

Invariance theorem

A

Changes in assets which do not change the span do not change consumption bundles or anything in the ‘real’ sector, only financial variables

30
Q

If D’, D have the same span, there exists a matrix K s.t. D’=DK where K has what property

A

invertible

31
Q

Proof of invatiance

A

budget set with q,w,D is same as with qK,w,D’ by using K^-1z

32
Q

Arbitrage if

A

qz<0 or DZ>0 with the other holding with equality

ie get positive price now for 0 cost later or positive payoff later for 0 price now

33
Q

Fundamental Theorem

A

q=pD
equilibrium price q
admits no arbitrage if this holds
p can be interpreted as probabilities or prices

34
Q

if q=pD then p* is

A

a no-arbitrage equil price

works other way round if p* is equil then so is q*

35
Q

There always exists a no arbitrage euqil

A

this proof won’t be asked