Neary Flashcards

1
Q

Rationality conditions

A
  1. Completeness

2. Transitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

WARP

A

If x chosen from any B containing x and y, then y never chosen from any B containing both x and y
p.x(p’,w’)=w’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Revealed preference relation

A

x is at least once chosen when y is available
need not be complete or transitive
rational preferences imply WARP will be observed but not viseversa

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which implies which:

utility function exists, rationality, WARP

A

U(.) exists means preferences must be rational which means WARP will be satisfies
But WARP is necessary but insufficient for rationality which itself almost always (but not always) implies the utility fn exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Engel curve

A

For fixed prices, the bundle demanded as a function of wealth
Gradient=∂x(p, w)/∂w

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Walras’ law in budget shares

A

budget share of product l: bl(p,w)=pl*xl(p,w)/w

W.L.: sum of bl=1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Normal vs inferior products

A

income effect positive vs negative

income elasticity positive vs negative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Luxury good vs necessity

A

budget share increases with wealth (so will also be normal) vs decreases with wealth (all inferior are necessities)
income elasticity > 1 vs < 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Giffen good

A

negative own price effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

f is homogeneous of degree k if

A

x · ∇ f(x) = k f(x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Engel Aggregation

A

sum of budget shares times income elasticities for all goods is 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cournot Aggregation

A

budget share of k plus sum of budget shares of all times cross-price elasticities of all with k = 0

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Compensated price changes

Slutsky wealth compensation

A

to identify the substitution effect
change the agent’s wealth so that the original bundle is still just affordable
change in w=(p’-p).x(p,w)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does Law of Demand say about Giffen goods

A

Impossible when price rises are compensated (assuming rationality ie exhausted budget set)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

SARP

A

if x1 is revealed preferred to xn via a chain of pair-wise comparisons, then xn cannot be revealed preferred to x1 in a pair-wise comparison
Essential WARP with transitivity of weak preference relation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If u(.) is quasi-concave

A

Then preferences are convex (think indifference curves)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Homothetic preferences

A

if indifferent between x and y then also indifferent between kx and ky
utility function is h.o.d. 1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Quasi-linear preferences

A

take 2 indifferent bundles. If you add x units of good 1 to both bundles, then still indifferent
Utility functions: U=x1+u(x2…xL)
x1 often used as money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Quasi-concavity implies

A

The solution to the consumer’s problem is unique

through convexity of preferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Indirect utility

A

The maximum utility obtainable with prices p and wealth w

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Convex shape of price indifference curves for indirect utility means

A

Prefer extreme prices to average prices

22
Q

expenditure function

A

minimum p.x s.t. u(x)>=u

23
Q

h(p,u)

A

Compensated demand function. Demand for each good given prices and utility to achieve.
Compensated means own price effect must be negative (no income effect here)

24
Q

e(p,u) is convex or concave in p?

A

Concave

25
Q

Shephard’s Lemma

A

partial of e(p,u) wrt pl=hl(p,u)

26
Q

Hicksian Substitutes vs Complements

A

Partial of hl wrt pk>0 vs <0
An increase in the price of good k increases vs decreases demand for good l
Each product always has at least one substitute
Since own price effect is negative and sum of price effects =0 as h is hod0

27
Q

Gross subs

A

partial of xl wrt pk>0

28
Q

Edgeworth Subs

A

second partial of u wrt xk, xl <0

29
Q

Roy’s identity

A

xl(p,w)=-partial of v wrt pl/partial of v wrt w

Proof starts by differentiation u=v(p,e(p,u))

30
Q

The Slutsky Equation

A

partial of xl wrt pk= substitution effect and wealth effect

=partial of hl wrt pk - partial of xl wrt w * xk(p,w)

31
Q

If a good is normal and gross substitutes with k then

A

the two products must also be Hicksian substitutes

32
Q

With homothetic preferences:
e(p,u)=
v(p,w)=
x(p,w)=

A

u(.) is hod1 in x:
e=e(p)u
v=v(p)
w
x=x(p)*w

33
Q

With quasi-linear preferences, Hicksian and Walrasian demand functions for x

A

Coincide as there is no wealth effect

34
Q

Slutsky wealth compensation after a price change

A

Gives the consumer enough wealth that they can buy the old bundle
change in wealth=(p’-p)*x(p,w)
But can usually do better with this wealth with the new prices and will choose a different bundle and be happier than they were

35
Q

Hicksian wealth compensation

A

Gives the consumer enough wealth so their utility is unchanged.
w’=e(p’,v(p,w))

36
Q

If yl is positive vs negative

A

it is an output vs input

37
Q

Hotelling’s Lemma

A

the partial of the profit function wrt pl = yl(p)

38
Q

1st step of Hotelling’s Lemma proof

A

let G(p)=p.y(p*)-profit function of p

39
Q

Law of supply

A

Prices and quantities move in the same direction

40
Q

Firms version of Shephard’s Lemma

A

partial of the cost function c(w,q) wrt wl=zl(w,q) which is the conditional factor demand function (w is input prices)

41
Q

Production is efficient if

A

Can’t produce more output with same inputs or same output with fewer inputs

42
Q

The long run cost curve

A

The lower envelope of the short-run cost curves (the locus of minimum points)

43
Q

Certainty equivalent of a lottery

A

C satisfies u(C)=E(u(x))

44
Q

Risk premium

A

P satisfies u(E(x)-P)=E(u(x))

p=E(x)-C

45
Q

Coefficient of ARA

A

Ra=-u’‘(x)/u’(x)>0

46
Q

CARA

A

constant absolute risk aversion

No income effect in the demand for insurance

47
Q

DARA

A

decreasing absolute risk aversion

Insurance is an inferior good, pay less to eliminate a small risk

48
Q

If the utility function is quadratic, expected utility only depends on

A

Mean and variance of the distribution of the shock

49
Q

Coefficient of relative risk aversion

A

Rr(x)=-xu’‘(x)/u’(x)

50
Q

First step of proof that maximised profit function is convex

A

let p’‘=ap+(1-a)p’