Week FIVE: Ethical Decision-Making Flashcards
What is the process that leads to ethical/unethical behaviours
- ethical issue intensity
- individual factors
- organisational factors
- opportunity
=>=> business ethics evaluation and intentions
=>=> ethical/unethical behaviour
Explain the following:
- Ethical issue intensity/moral intensity
- individual factors
- organisational factors
- opportunity
Ethical issue intensity
= perceived relevance/importance of an ethical issue to the individual, work group, organisation
- Reflects the ethical sensitivity of the individual or work group and triggers the ethical decision process
positive/negative incentives can affect the perceived importance of an ethical issue
- Employees need education regarding potential problem areas
Moral intensity = person’s perception of social pressure and the harm the decision will have on others
- Posed that every ethical issue can be framed in terms of its moral intensity = situational intensity
- > Social consensus of evil = degree of social agreement that about the moral value (eg. evil) of proposed act
- > Magnitude of consequences = sum of the benefits/harm done to victims/beneficiaries of the moral act in question
- > Concentration of effect = how spread out/concentrated the harms/benefits of the proposed action
- > Probability of harm = joint of function of the probability that the act in question will actually take place and will actually cause predicted harm/benefit
- > Temporal immediacy of consequences = length of time between the present and onset of consequences of the moral act in question
- > Proximity to victim = feeling of neamness (social, cultural, psychological, physical) that the moral agent has for the victims/beneficiaries of the evil/good act in question
Individual Factors
- People base their ethical decisions on their own values/principles of right or wrong
- Values learned through socialisation
- Good personal values decrease unethical behaviour and increase positive work behaviour
- Values are subjective and vary across cultures
- How people resolve ethical issues in their daily lives is often based on values and principles learned through family socialisation
- In the workplace, ethical issues involve honesty, conflict of interest, discrimination, theft
- Individuals stage of cognitive development may affect conduct
- > Eg. gender, nationality
- > Education & work experience => more education, better at making ethical decisions
- > Age => complex relationship, older is more experience but younger rely on organisation’s culture
- > Locus of control => internal locus of control (formed own destiny) will be more ethical than external locus (believe their fate is in the hands of others)
Organisational Factors
- Consists of corporate culture (set of shared values, norms and artifacts that influence organisational behaviour), significant others, obedience to authority
- Organisational culture has stronger influence on employees than individual values
Significant Others
- Work group eg. peers, managers and subordinates
- Help on a daily basis with unfamniliar tasks and provide advice and information formally and informally
- Have more influence on daily decisions than any other factor
Obedience on Authority
- An aspect of influence that significant others can exercise
- Helps us explain why many employees resolve business issues by simply following the directives of a superior
Eg. Stanley Milgrim Experiment
Opportunity
- Relates to permitting ethical/unethical behaviour
- When employees act unethically, what are you encouraging them to do?
- Rewards and punishment play a key role
- Relates to the employee’s immediate job context
- Can be eliminated by establishing formal codes, policies and rules that are enforced
What are the political, economic and social aspects that make up normative values?
Political
- Political influences can take place within the organisation
- Ethical organisation has policies and rules in place to determine appropriate behaviour
- Often compliance component of the firm’s organisational culture
- Failure to abide by these rules result in disciplinary action
- Legal actions such as price fixing, antitrust issues and consumer protection are important in maintaining fair and equiable marketplace
Economic
- Competition affects how a company operates as well as risks employees take for the good of the firm
- Amount of competition in an industry can be determined according to:
- Barriers to entry in industry
- Available substitutes for the products produced by industry rivals
- Power of the industry rivals over customers
- Power of the industry rivals’ supplier over rivals
Social
- Social institutions incl religion, education and individuals such as family unit
- Laws meant to ensure an organisation acts fairly but no laws exist saying people should do to others as they would have done to them
- Many cultures adopt this rule that has been institutionalised nito businesses with standards on competing faily, being transparent with consumers and treating employees with respect
Outline how companies implement principles and core values to ensure ethical decision-making
Veil of ignorance
=thought experiment that examined how individuals would formulate principles if they did not know what their future position in society would be
Two main principles of justice
= Liberty principle (equality principle) -> states each person has basic rights that are compatible to the basic liberties of others
= Difference principle: economic and social equalities (or inequalities) should be arranged to provide the most benefit to the least-advantaged members of society
- Companies take basic principles and translate them into core values
- Value practices evolve and are translated into normative definitions of ethical/unethical
- Organisations that have ethics programs based on a values orientation found to make a greater contribution than those based simply on compliance
- Ethical issue intensity, individual factors and opportunity result in business ethics evaluations and decisions
- Organisational ethical culture is shaped by effective leadership
Explain morality and how it may impact on ethical decision-making
= the efforts to guide one’s conduct by reason - to do what there are the best reasons for doing, while giving equal weight to the best interests of each individual who will be affected by the conduct
- Amounts to guidelines that set the boundaries of acceptable behaviour - concerned with harming others, paying proper regard for others well-being and treating people with respect
- Are the specific principles/values people use to decide right from wrong
- > Person-specific
- > Guidelines for determining how to settle conflict and optimise mutual benefit
- > Provide direction in formulating strategies and resolving ethical issues
- > One single philosophy is never going to be accepted/agreed on by all
- Moral philosophies used to make personal and work-related decisions vary
- > Differences exist in professional and private goals and pressures
- > An individuals moral philosophy may change to become compatible with work environment
Explain value orientation from the economic, idealism and realism perspectives
Economic value orientation: = values that can be quanitified by monetary means
- If an act produces value, accept it as ethical
Idealism:
= places special value on ideas and ideals as products of the mind
- Positive correlation to ethical decision-making
Realism:
= view that an external world exists independent of our perceptions
- Everyone guided by self interest
- Negative correlation to ethical decision-making
Define teleology (consequentialism) and some of its sub components eg. egoism and utilitarianism
Teleology (Consequentialism)
= Considers an act as morally right/acceptable if it produces the desired result or consequence such as pleasure, knowledge, career growth, realisation of self interest or utility
- Assesses moral worth by looking at the consequences for the individual
Egoism
- Right or acceptable behaviour defined in terms of consequences to the individual
- Maximises personal interests
Enlightened egoists
- Have long-term perspective
- Consider wellbeing of others
- Self-interest deciding factor
Utilitarianism
- Greatest good for greatest number of people
- Concerned with consequences
- Considers cost/benefit
- Behaviour base don principles of rules that promote greatest utility rather than on examination of each situation
Rule utilitarian
- Behaviour based on principles/rules
Act utilitarians
- Behaviour based on actions
Define deontology
Nonconsequentialism/universalism
- Focuses on the rights of the individual, not consequences (considers intention)
- Believes in equal respect and views certain behaviours as inherently right
- Proposes that individuals have certain inherent freedoms
- Freedoms: conscience, consent, privacy, speech, due process
Rule deontologists
- Conformity to general moral principles
Act deontologists
- Evaluate ethicalness based on the act
Explain the relativist perspective
- Defines ethical behaviour subjectively from the experiences of individuals/groups
- Use themselves or those around them as their basis for defining ethical standards
- Positive group consensus indicates an action is considered ethical by the group
- Acknowledges we live in a society in which people have different views
Explain virtue ethics and justice
- What is moral in a given situation is not only what conventional wisdom suggests but also what ‘moral character’ would deem appropriate
- Includes truthfulness, trust, self control, empathy and fairness
- Contrasting attributes include lying, cheating, fraud, corruption
- Virtues that support business transactions
Justice
- Fair treatment and due reward in accordance with ethical/legal standards
Distributive justice:
= evaluation of the results of business relationship
Procedural justice:
= considers processes and activities that produce desired outcomes
Interactional justice:
= based on relationship between organisational members, incl employees & managers
Explain Kohlbergs Model of Cognitive Moral Development and strengths and limitations of the theory
Level 1:
- childhood
- individuals concerned with their own immediate interests
Level 2:
- adolescence/early adulthood
- individual equates rights with conformity to expectations of good behaviour on large scale
Level 3:
- individual overlooks norms, laws and authority of groups/individuals
- understand there are differing morals out there and may disregard rules if they are inconsistent with their own personal values/ethics
+ Shows that individuals can change their values through moral development
+ Supports management’s development of employee’s moral principles
Three hit theory says
- Kohlberg used questionable research methods
- Theory contradicts basic moral philosophy
- Therefore, may not be valid