Week 9 : Experiments Flashcards
An experiment is…
- A research method where the researcher manipulates one or more independent variable(s) to determine the effect(s) on a dependent variable
- A procedure designed to test the EFFECT of some treatment on some outcome
Basic things about experiments…
- quantitative method
- non-probability sample
- controlled settings
- very few variables
All experiments share 3 key features…
- Manipulation of the independent variable
- Random assignment of participants to experimental & control conditions (essential for causality) - but is subject to random error
- experimental control of other factors that could influence the outcome of the experiment
Variables in Experiments
- Independent variable - treatment, cause, predictor
- Dependent variable - outcome, effect
3 Advantages of Experiments
- Experimental is the best research method to establish causality
- Experiments can uncover mechanisms that produce an outcome (quantify the effect)
- Experiments can be used to evaluate abstract theories about the workings of the social world (internal validity)
Causality - 3 Conditions
- The two variables must be correlated (positively/negatively)
- time order - the cause (IV) must precede the effect (DV)
- the relationship between the independent variable & dependent variable must not be spurious (caused by some other factor/confound) - hardest to satisfy
- experiments are well suited for removing spuriousness/confounders because of controlled setting & random assignment
Key weaknesses in experiments
- non-probability sample… target population is abstract (ppl), systematic errors & errors with generalizability
- realness (treatment vs real life decisions)
- small sample size (relative to surveys)
- external validity
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
- create a setting that’s engaging & makes sense to the participant
- design treatment / manipulate independent variable while holding other factors constant & randomly assign
- Valid & reliable measure of dependent variable
- debrief & assess quality
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
1 - Creating the setting
- Keep participants actively enaged in the experiment (a sense of purpose & rationale for thier participation
- participants need to follow experimental procedures & pay attention to what’s being asked of them
- participants should be comfortable & not distracted
- Should not be suspicious about the study’s hypothesis (use a cover story)
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
2 - Manipulate independent variable
- maniuplation must be salient to participants
- but should not be so strong that participants can guess the study’s hypothesis
- Use confederates - individuals who are trained to pretend to be study participants & interact with the participant (e.g. soccer fans & helping study)
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
2 - between-subject & within-subject designs
- between-subject design… participants are randomly assigned to different levels of the independent variable
- within-subject design… all the participants receive all levels of the independent variable (preferred cuz easier to control & require fewer participants)
- sometimes researchers use a mixture
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
3 - Measuring the dependent variable (3 ways)
- behavioural measures - observation of overt & observable actions (Commonly used to measure whether stereotypes have a negative effect)
- attitudinal measures - Self-reports in which participants respond to questions about their attitudes, opinions & beliefs (susceptible to social desireability bias)
- Physiological measures - biological responses to stimuli (hard & expensive)
4 stages in designing a laboratory (‘true’) experiment
4 - wrapping up the experiment with debriefing
- explain to the participants that the decetion served a scientific purpose
- ensure that the participants understand the deception was not real
- give the participants an opportunity to learn about the research
Random assignment
- participants randomly assigned to treatment/control groups
- random assignment removes systematic differences between the two groups
- on average leads to identical groups, but this is subject to random error
3 kinds of random assignment
1 - true random assignment
- random numner generator ideal
- but for example, each person takes their turn to flip a coin to get seperated into the treatment/control groups