Week 9 Efficient Market Hypothesis Flashcards

1
Q

What is an efficient market?

A
  • The notion that stock reflect all available information - prices at any time are based on a ‘correct’ valuation of all available information.
  • In an efficient market, stocks react quickly and efficiently to new information.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why do we care about market efficiency?

A
  • Why is an efficient market desirable? Because prices are fair.
  • -> when firms issue securities they will get fair price
  • -> Investors will pay fair prices
  • -> the market will allocate resources smoothly (inefficient allocation of resources can seriously hurt the economy)
  • IF PRICES ARE FAIR/CORRECT, THE ONLY WAY AN INVESTOR GETS HIGHER RETURNS ON AVERAGE IS BY TAKING ON MORE RISK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Weak Form Efficient

A
  • the market incorporates all useful information in past pricing data when it sets prices today
  • -> prices
  • -> trading volume
  • -> short interest
  • implies trend analysis is fruitless. WFE holds that if such data every conveyed reliable signals about future performance, all investors would’ve already exploited the signals. CANNOT USE PAST PRICE DATA TO GENERATE HIGHER EXPECTED RETURNS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Semi-strong efficient

A
  • the market correctly uses all relevant public information available at time t to set prices at time t
  • -> past prices
  • -> fundamental data on the firm’s product line
  • -> earnings forecast
  • -> accounting info
  • -> balance sheet composition
  • CANNOT USE ANY PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION TO GENERATE HIGHER EXPECTED RETURNS
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strong Form Efficient

A
  • market correctly uses all relevant public and private information available at time t to set prices at time t
  • EVEN POEPLE WITH INSIDER INFO CAN’T GENERATE HIGHER EXPECTED RETURNS UNRELATED TO RISK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Testing Market Efficiency

A
  • we could test market efficiency if we observed correct prices, but we only observe the prices the market sets
  • would could test wether the market is efficient if we knew how the market determined expected returns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Joint Hypothesis Problem

A
  • we don’t know how the market determines expected returns
  • we need a model of market equilibrium to tell us how expected returns are determined by the market
  • any test is simultaneously a test of efficiency and of correctness of the model of market equilibrium
  • most evidence for and against market efficiency suffers from joint hypothesis problem
  • -> one hypothesis is CAPM, another hypothesis is market efficiency. In examples it is impossible to tell which hypothesis fails: the CAPM or the market efficiency.
  • Abnormal returns in excess of the CAPM represent a way of adding return without raking on more risk, or they represent a return for risk that we don’t’ understand
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evidence Against Market Efficiency

A
  1. Small stocks have higher returns on average than larger stocks, even after adjusting for their beta with the market
  2. “value” stocks, i.e. stocks with a high book to stock price ratio have higher returns than “growth” stocks
  3. times of high P/E ratios or high price-dividend ratios for the overall stock market tend to be followed by periods of low returns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tests of Market Efficiency

A
  • a common way is by using event studies –> event studies look at the pattern of prices/returns around a public event (i.e. cuts to dividends, announcement buy-backs, positive/negative earnings surprises)
  • pattern:
  • -> a sudden drop or rise in the stock price on announcement
  • -> comparatively little movement in prices in the days following the announcement
  • -> occasionally there is a drift in the “right” direction prior to announcement
  • evidence suggest that markets are semi-strong
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is behavioural finance?

A

The study of how security prices are affected by systematic errors made by investors –> based on cognitive psychology
–> the systematic errors are caused by cognitive behavioural biases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Cognitive Biases

A
  • people tend to not process information correctly
  • people over react to exciting/dramatic information
  • people under react to boring information
  • people over react to private information
  • people under react to public info
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The Small Firm Effect

A

Abnormal Risk-adjusted returns

  • small stocks may have outperformed large stocks by ~10% per year
  • Small stocks may be riskier; but even when adjusted for risk, still consistent premium
  • we would not expect such minimal effort to yield such strong returns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

January Effect

A
  • much of the small firm effect occurs in January
  • generally stocks do better in January, particularly early in the month, than the rest of the year. Investors tend to sell-off low performing stocks at the end of each year. They tend to buy those stocks back a few weeks or even days later
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Day of the Week Effect

A
  • returns on Mondays have been consistently lower than returns on other days
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Turn of the month effect

A

stock prices usually increase during the last 4 days and first 3 days of each month

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Holiday effect

A

returns are much larger in days preceding market closures for holidays

17
Q

Halloween Effect

A

Observations over 319 years show November through April returns 4.5% higher than summer returns

18
Q

Value vs. Growth Effect

A
  • the dramatic dependence of returns on B/M ratios is independent on beta, suggesting either that high B/M are relatively underpriced, or that B/M ratio is serving as a proxy for a risk factor that affects equilibrium returns
  • Behavioural explanation: over-reaction/over-exploitation
19
Q

Earnings Drift

A
  • slow price response to announcements
  • strategy:
  • -> each quarter, rank stocks on size of the surprise in their earnings announcement
  • -> form a portfolio of stocks with largest surprise (A) and a portfolio of stocks with the largest negative surprise (B)
  • A outperforms B
  • A FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE OF EFFICIENT MARKET IS THAT ANY NEW INFO OUGHT TO BE REFLECTED VERY QUICKLY
20
Q

Momentum

A
  • Strategy: form portfolios that performed very well in recent past, i.e., over past 3 months to 1 years. Similarly, form portfolios of losers
  • Winners outperform losers over next 6 months to 1 year
  • BEHAVIORAL EXPLANATIONS:
  • -> under-reaction: good news comes out but investors under-react. Then, prices slowly drift upwards to the rational price.
  • -> under-reaction: irrational investors over-react to positive news. This over-reaction is gradual, so stock prices display momentum for a period but then reverse and return to fundamental
21
Q

Long-Run Reversals

A
  • strategy: form the same portfolios as in momentum but looking at longer periods (previous 5 years)
  • losers outperform winners over next 5 years
22
Q

Anomalies Around Corporate Events

A
  • Changes in Dividend Policy:
  • -> Strategy: buy companies the have just announced a dividend increase, sell those that have announced a cut
  • Asset Growth:
  • -> stocks with high asset growth underperform stocks with low asset growth
  • Net Repurchases of Shares
  • -> stocks with high net repurchases have higher returns that stocks with low net repurchases
23
Q

Representative Heuristic

A
  • people think they see patterns in truly random sequences
  • extrapolate a trend in the recent data too far into the future
  • -> might classify some stocks as growth stocks based on a history of consistent earnings growth, ignoring the likelihood that there are very few companies that keep growing
  • Representativeness gives rise to delayed overreaction
24
Q

Self Attribution and Confirmation Bias

A
  • people attribute successful outcomes to their own skill but blame unsuccessful outcomes on bad luck
  • confirmation bias: favour info that supports their beliefs
25
Q

Prospect Theory

A

Key ingredients:

  • -> prospect theory agents care about gains or losses relative to a reference point
  • -> they are loss-averse. Prospect theory investors treat losses and gains asymmetrically. Downside losses are more painful
  • -> Risk loving when faced with investment losses
  • -> they are over-weight small probabilities
26
Q

Risk Aversion:

A

will not accept risk without compensation; willing to buy insurance to reduce risk

27
Q

Are you loss averse?

A

Loss aversion does not equal risk aversion
- an individual is loss averse if the disutility of giving up a valued good is much higher than the utility gain associated with receiving the same good

28
Q

Mental Accounting

A
  • says that individuals divide their assets into separate, non-transferable portions (e.g. money for consumption etc.)
  • -> each new stock bought, a mental account is opened
  • important feature: narrow framing –> tendency to treat individuals gambles separately from other portions fo wealth
29
Q

Prospect Theory Application to Portfolio Choice

A
  • prospect theory investors do not choose well diversified portfolios
  • a prospect theory investor is risk-seeking over losses. To him, the property of diversification which averages downside risks is welfare reducing
  • behavioural portfolios are structured in layers of a pyramid, e.g. “downside protection” and an “upside potential” layer
  • combine very safe and very risky choices
  • they hold onto loser stocks while realize gains quickly
30
Q

Application: Equity Risk Premium

A
  • the attractiveness of a risky assets depends on the evaluation horizon
  • the more frequently one evaluates portfolio, the more likely they see losses
  • -> to a loss-averse investors who evaluates their portfolio, the stock market appears very risky
31
Q

Application BF Value vs. Growth

A

BF economists believe that the value effect is caused by overreaction
–> growth stocks have been doing well. They have high earnings growth. People overreact and push prices higher, setting up lower returns

32
Q

Does BF matter?

A
  • proponents of efficient markets do claim that irrational behaviour does not affect equilibrium prices; irrational cancel out and rational drive them out
33
Q

BF Response to EMH

A
  • proponents of BF think that investor biases can and do affect asset prices
  • luck may matter: security returns are random variables, luck plays a role…some irrational yet lucky traders may end up controlling large pools of money, thus affecting market prices
  • friction and transaction costs: misplacing cannot be corrected if the cost of the transaction is larger than the potential benefit
  • sentiment risk: irrational traders may make it risky for rational traders to offset irrational