Week 6 - Equity Premium and Asset Allocation Flashcards
What is equity premium?
The equity premium is the difference between the average returns on stock market index and the risk free rate
- estimated to be about 6% during the 100 years
- Stocks have a higher return on average than bonds
- however in a given year, stocks may have much lower returns than bonds
What is risk aversion?
- risk aversion: demanding compensation for bearing risk
- The term risk-averse describes the investor who chooses the preservation of capital over the potential for a higher-than-average return
- the return pattern for stocks and bonds is consistent with risk aversion
- -> stocks have higher average returns and higher standard deviations historically…explanation: investors demand higher returns on average for stocks to offset the higher variation in the returns
What is the equity premium puzzle?
- many economists think the 6% equity premium is too big under standard rational model of investor preference and market risk
- yes, economists agree that stocks are riskier
- but not risky enough to justify 6% per year for the level of risk aversion observed in the experiments
Explanations of Equity Premium
- survivorship bias:
- -> we only looked at the US market which has been the best performing market over the past 100 years
- -> if you look at the whole world, than the premium is not that big
- maybe we are measuring risk incorrectly or incompletely
- it is hard to estimate future expected returns with historical realized returns
- investor sentiment and psychology
Rethinking the equity risk premium
- long-term government bonds have gained 11.5% a year on average over the past three decades, beating the 10.8% increase in the S&P500
- on the other hand, many people claim “stocks are dead”
- retail investors seem to agree (they have been pulling money out of stock mutual funds every year since 2008)
- general consensus of academics and CFO’s is that the ERP is perhaps closer to 3-4%
Are stocks less risky in the long-run?
- annualized return volatility decreases with investment horizon. BUT, what matters is your wealth at the end of your investment horizon, not the annualized return
- short fall risk decreases with investment horizon
- but this ignores the size of potential losses, which for some of the possible outcomes amount to complete ruin
- if you end up with a loss at the end of the investment horizon, the magnitude of the loss tends to be bigger, when the horizon is longer
- a better way to quantify the risk of a long-term investment is the market price of insuring it against short fall
- -> the cost of such long-term insurance premium is very high and increases with horizon
- -> it costs 20% of the initial value of portfolio to insure against shortfall risk over 10 year
- -> a 25 year policy would costs 30% of the initial portfolio value
Diversify across time…
adding risks
Diversify across assets…
dividing risks
Expected portfolio return
E(rp) = wE(r1)+(1-w)E(r2)
Variance of a two-risky asset portfolio
variance = w^2variance(r1)+(1-w)^2variance(r2)+2w(1-w)Covariance(r1,r2)
Correlation between r1,r2
=cov(r1,r2)/SD(r1)SD(r2)
Covariance r1, r2
=correlation(r1,r2)SD(r1)SD(r2)
Diversification between two risky assets
- the portfolio has the same expected return as the individual stocks but it also has a smaller variance
- the portfolio variance will always be lower as long as the stocks are not perfectly correlated
- if correlation is sufficiently low we can find a portfolio with lower variance than either of the assets
How is the mean-variance boundary formed?
- we picked the expected return we want, and then choose the weights of the portfolio so that the variance of the portfolio is minimized
- -> min portfolio variance; subject to E(rp) = K
What does mean-variance portfolio theory tell us?
- the MV portfolio theory says that any investor will choose the optimal portfolio from the set of portfolios that:
- -> maximize expected return for a given level of risk
- -> minimize risk for a given level of expected return