Week 7 - Lecture 7 - Social Influence Flashcards
What is social influence?
- Process whereby attitudes and behaviours are influenced by the real or implied presence of other people;
- Efforts by one or more individuals to change the attitudes, beliefs, perceptions or behaviours of one or more others;
What is compliance?
A means of social influence used to reach goals or attain social or personal gains;
compliance more superficial - changing behaviour rather than attitudes
what are the types of social influence?
compliance, conformity, obedience
factors influencing compliance in an individual
group strength
group size
immediacy
similarity
what is similarity in compliance and how does similarity influence compliance?
sharing something in common with the person making the request - more likely to comply is request comes from someone similar to us
what is group strength in compliance and how does group strength influence compliance?
importance of group affiliation –> compliance with social pressure
if a group is important to us, we want them to like us and therefore comply with their request
what is group size in compliance and how does group size influence compliance?
increasing the number of people present increases the likelihood of compliance
what is immediacy in compliance and how does immediacy influence compliance?
being in the immediate presence of a group - physical presence makes it more difficult to say no
what are the techniques used to gain compliance?
foot-in-the-door technique
door-in-the-face technique
low-balling
norm of reciprocity
what is the foot-in-the-door technique?
- Small request –accepted – followed by the ‘real’ one – large;
- Multiple request technique to gain compliance, in which the goal request is preceded by a smaller request that is bound to be accepted.
example showing how the foot-in-the-door technique can be used to gain compliance
Freedman and Fraser (1966)
- Small request: to put up a small sign or to sign a petition;
- Large request: to install in their front lawn a very large sign which said “Drive Carefully.“
- control group had no small request first.
- 20% of people in control group allowed the sign, 55% in experimental group agreed to put up a sign
critique of the foot-in-the-door technique
However, FITD not as robust as assumed; the time between 2 requests is crucial and the sex of the experimenter might affect the results (Beaman et al., 1983)
what is the door-in-the-face technique?
- Huge request –rejected –followed by the ‘real’ one;
- Multiple request technique to gain compliance, in which the focal request is preceded by a larger request that is bound to be refused;
Example of how door-in-the-face technique can be used to gain compliance
Cialdini et al. (1975) – Unpaid student counsellors field trip
experiment.
- asked to be unpaid counsellors to juvenile delinquents for 2 years, then asked instead to be a chaperone to them for 2 hours on the trip to the zoo.
- rejections and acceptance - 50% said yes, control (small request only) - 16.7% said yes
- 3rd - exposure control, given choice to decide between the 2. 25% said they’d go to zoo.
- giving people control may contribute to more success than just asking small request
what is the low-ball technique?
A persuader gets you to commit to some action and then, before you actually perform the behaviour, they increase the ‘cost’ of that same behaviour;
example of how low-balling can be used to gain compliance
- Cialdini et al. (1978) –7am start experiment
- asked to commit experiment and then told after they had committed to start at 7am
evidence for whether the foot-in-the-door technique or the low-ball technique is more effective in gaining compliance
Joule, 1987
- Students were requested to stop smoking for 18 hours for 30 French francs. The researchers used either FITD or LB technique;
- 7 conditions
- Lowball technique first offered 50 francs but then revealed they’d have to stop smoking and for only 30 francs, but they had already committed
- foot in the door first filled in questionnaire but then told the actual request
- Results: the low-ball technique was more effective than the foot-in-the-door technique;
(why? In the lowball technique they are already invested in process whereas FITD technique they are not)
what is the norm of reciprocity?
- ‘Doing a favour’ for a person before asking them to do something for you;
- The persuader relies on the accepted convention that people will treat others as they are treated themselves;
example of how norm of reciprocity can be used to influence compliance?
Regan’s (1971) raffle tickets study;
- confederate gave people waiting soft drinks before asking them for a favour (buying raffle tickets)
- more likely to buy tickets if they were first given a soft drink
How are power and compliance linked?
Compliance is not only linked to the perceived power exhibited by the source of influence.
what is power?
the capacity to influence others whilst resisting their attempts to influence
Moscovici link to power
Moscovici - came up with the distinction between power and influence.
- Power is about obtaining compliance and submission through domination.
- If you have power you don’t need influence
French and Rave (1959, 1993) types of power
reward power
coercive power
informational power
expert power
legitimate power
referent power
reward power
ability to give us something for compliance
coercive power
ability to threaten or punish for non-compliance
informational power
someone treated as source of information to us
expert power
someone perceived as expert
legitimate power
person is in position of power, e.g. police officer