Week 7&8: Lie detection Flashcards

1
Q

What are the key components of deception?

A
  1. Intent: needs to be an intentional attempt to deceive someone
  2. No forewarning: Person doesn’t tell they’re attempting to
  3. Success is not relevant: it is just the attempt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of deception?

A
  • Falsifications: making stuff up
  • Distortions/exaggerations: changing the story in some way
  • Omissions: leaving things out of the story
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the 3 ways to catch a liar?

A
  1. Physiological/formal techniques - normally using technology to measure physiological changes e.g. polygraph
  2. Non-verbal/body language cues: some of these are things that people BELIEVE are associated with lying and things that ACTUALLY are
  3. Verbal cues: content of the lie - active interviewing techniques
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a polygraph?

A

Technology that has a lot of sensors that measure physiological senses when you interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What kinds of things does a polygraph measure?

A
  • Heart rate
  • Blood pressure
  • Breathing (rate & depth)
  • Skin response

Certain patterns in these indicate if the person is telling the truth or lying due to a change in emotion when lying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 2 polygraphing techniques?

A
  1. Control Questions Technique (CQT)

2. Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the Control (comparison) Questions Technique (CQT) of polygraphing?

A

Comparing responses of (3):
Neutral questions: to establish a baseline (e.g. whats your name)

Relevant questions: related to the specific crime under investigation

Control questions: unrelated to the crime in question - ask questions that most people would find it difficult to say no to - a person who is being honest should say yes. A person who is telling the truth is assumed to fear control questions more than relevant questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the idea of control and relevant questions (CQT)?

A

Crime relevant questions should provoke more anxiety than control questions if guilty

If innocent - asking about actual crime shouldn’t produce too much anxiety or stress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some problems for the CQT?

A

Assumes that control questions are going to be more anxiety provoking for innocent suspects - basis for entire question techniques

Role of examiner - shouldn’t scare the suspect too much or too little with control Q’s - will change gap between two types of questions and have implications for either innocent or guilty suspects

Ethical issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the polygraph Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT)?

A

Based on recognition response (not emotion) - physiological responses indicate
Responses triggered by personally relevant stimuli - when we recognise something

Questions that only a guilty person would know and several plausible explanations given for answer
- Suspect gives same response to each one ‘no’
If they’re guilty they will have a greater reaction to the correct (recognised) alternative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the advantage to the GKT?

A

Better ethics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Problems of GKT?

A

It is limited to cases where the guilty person has the relevant knowledge and the innocent suspect doesn’t
Knowledge doesn’t = guilt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the polygraph work?

A

Claims of 99% accuracy

- Dodgy way of obtaining statistics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What do proper data show on effectiveness of polygraphs?

A

Can get accuracy rates between 65-85% generally, does vary from study to study

No where near accurate enough to be treated as evidence in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some methodological issues with polygraph data?

A

In lab studies: the stakes might not be high enough

In field studies: no way of knowing if the person is actually guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are polygraph countermeasures?

A

Attempts to ‘beat’ a polygraph
1. increase physiological response to baseline/control measures - physical approach (bite tongue) or mental approach (imagine being slapped)

  1. Decrease response to relevant items - dampen down response
    - mental distraction techniques - takes attention away (count sheep, backwards etc)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Can you really beat a polygraph?

A
  • 50% of participants beat CQT in 30 min of training
  • only 12% of physical countermeasures detected - no mental countermeasures were detected
  • less effective for some techniques (target items)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What are target items?

A

Used in GKT
- Administrator gives a list of things to memorise
- These appear as alternatives in GKT
An innocent person will recognise the target items but not guilty ones
Non-recognition of targets = probably using countermeasures

19
Q

What is thermal imaging and how is it used in CJS?

A

Based on instantaneous anxiety response

When people lie, common to see heat around the eyes based on emotional responses

20
Q

How accurate is thermal imaging?

A

83%

21
Q

What are some advantages to thermal imaging?

A

It is quick with little training required

May be suitable for mass screening

22
Q

Problems with thermal imaging?

A

Lower accuracy rates when replicated in other studies (67%)

Prone to false positives (may suggest an innocent person is guilty)

23
Q

Brain fingerprinting (ERP)?

A

Event-related potentials: reactions to relevant and irrelevant items (own name in series of random names)

Orientating technique

  • can use with GKT
  • Should get increase P300 reactions to recognised items
24
Q

Brain fingerprinting fMRI?

A

Measures changes in blood flow reflecting activity in spinal cord and in the brain

25
Q

How can fMRI brain fingerprinting be used in lie detection?

A

Activity in prefrontal cortex:

  • executive control: monitoring or inhibiting responses
  • monitoring reactions of audience

Activity in anterior cingulate cortex
- risk-reward assessment - whether worth taking risk
- anticipation of consequences - weighing against consequences
Clearly linked to idea of lying and trying to get away with it

26
Q

Pros of fMRI studies on lie detection?

A

Accuracy rates 78-93%

Better than tapping into emotional systems - control systems instead

27
Q

Cons of fMRI studies on lie detection?

A

Inconsistency in results
Cost
Ethical and legal guidelines (illegal search?, tried to use fMRI in court to demonstrate truthfulness for wealthy people who hire the machines)

A lot more work to be done to be certain

28
Q

What non-verbal things do people believe are signs of deception?

A

Signs of nervousness

  • Gaze aversion (e.g. looking away)
  • Increased body movement (e.g. fidgeting)

Commonly reported - people overwhelmingly think these are indictors of lies

29
Q

What verbal things do people believe are signs of deception?

A

Reduced detail and errors in speech content

30
Q

What is the typical method for testing how good people are at detecting deception?

A

Get someone to tell truths and lies

Get another person to watch and try to pick the lies

31
Q

How accurate are ordinary people at detecting deception?

A

57% (only marginally better than chance)

32
Q

How accurate are police, customs officers etc at detecting deception?

A

56% (only marginally better than chance)

33
Q

What kinds of people are a little bit better at detecting deception but still not particularly good?

A

Secret service agents - 64%

CIA agents - 74%

34
Q

Why are professionals no better at detecting deception in experimental conditions?

A

In experiments maybe the stakes aren’t high enough for the liars e.g. no reason for suspects to be nervous (65% for real suspects and serious crime)
OR..
In experiments there may be a lack of interaction with the suspect - if they are simply watching a video, they are passive. Maybe it would be better if they could interact - however on average, they aren’t much better (56.7%)

35
Q

Where do we go wrong? Why can’t we detect deception?

A

Maybe we look for the wrong thing/rely on the wrong cues (e.g. increased gaze aversion and fidgeting are NOT signs of lying)

We may be giving incorrect explanations for behaviour

  • Acting nervous = lying OR worried about proving innocence
  • Avoiding eye contact = guilt? shyness? cultural reasons?
36
Q

Are there any definite signs of lying?

A

NO!

37
Q

What 3 underlying processes may lying trigger and what observable markers may these cause?

A
  • Emotions (guilt, fear) - higher voice pitch or micro expressions
  • Cognitive effort (complex details) - more errors, less detail, more structure
  • Attempted behaviour control (‘don’t fidget’) - more rigid, less expressions
38
Q

What percent can lie detection be improved by?

A

4% - not a big difference at all

39
Q

How do you improve the detection of deception?

A

Can train people to look or specific markers

  • Ignore gaze aversion
  • Monitor pauses and errors
  • Look for foot and leg movements
40
Q

What are some active interviewing techniques?

A
  • Increase cognitive load
  • Give unanticipated questions
  • Strategic use of information
41
Q

How would we increase cognitive load in an interview?

A

By making it cognitively more difficult for them to tell their stories (especially for liars who do not have genuine memories to rely on):
Asking them to repeat in reverse order
Maintain eye contact with them
Increase the amount of information generated by giving examples of evidence from other cases to set the bar/expectations higher
Ask for different reporting modes e.g. drawing pictures

42
Q

What is the point of increasing the cognitive load?

A

Wanting increased frequencies of errors and pauses to assist better lie detection

43
Q

What are some potential drawbacks for increasing the cognitive load?

A

It may increase the amount of inaccurate information generated by truth tellers during interviews (especially when memory for event is poor)

Effectiveness may depend on WMC:
- May be ineffective for high-WMC liars and bad for low-WMC truth tellers

44
Q

How do unanticipated questions work?

A

Liars prepare well for interviews but this benefit is reduced through unanticipated questions as they have to actually generate these answers on the spot
These Q’s are cognitively easier for truth tellers

Increases error and lie detection