Week 6; Psychology of Love and Attraction Flashcards

1
Q

Minimax Principle

A

If a relationship gives us more rewards than costs, we will wish to continue it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Equity Principle

A

-What you get out of a relationship should be proportional to what you put into it
- Evidence shows that tit for tat increases liking in the early stages of a relationship but decreases liking in stable and enduring relationships

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Relationship

A

A connection between two people such as friends or romantic partners

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Social Conditioning

A

-We like those we associate with good feeling i.e. those we encounter at the weekend, while doing hobbies, when relaxing etc.
- We may dislike someone if we associate them with aversive stimuli i.e. they look like a childhood bully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Proximity

A
  • How often people come into contact with each other because they are physically nearby
  • Most powerful prediction of a friend/ lovers stability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Neophobia

A

Humans tend to fear anything novel

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

3 Factors that influences liking someone

A
  • Interaction
  • Anticipation of Interaction
  • Mere exposure effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Interaction

A

From speaking to someone, you naturally discuss similarities and can gauge if they are interested in you through smiles and reciprocity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interaction; Twin Study

A
  • Only 5% of identical twins stated that they would be attracted to their twins fiancé
  • As genetic influences would be the same, this illustrates the importance of interaction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Anticipation of an Interaction

A
  • Just anticipated an interaction with another individual predisposes you to liking them
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Darley and Berscheid on anticipating an interaction

A
  • Studied a group of women
    -Some were informed that they would be meeting another woman tomorrow while others were not
  • The women that were told reported having higher levels of liking for the individual than those who were not
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Mere Exposure Effect

A

The tendency for novel stimuli to be liked more and rated more positively after the rater has been repeatedly exposed to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Zajonc’s Study on the Mere Exposure Effect

A
  • People were exposed to a number of Turkish numbers with some being repeated
  • When the testers were asked to guess the meanings of the words, they were more likely to attribute positive meanings to the repeated words
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Birds of a Feather

A

-People with similar attitudes, values, interests, backgrounds and personalities tend to like each other

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Matching Principle

A

Romantic couples tend to be physically similar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Norman Anderson’s study on Personality Characteristics

A

Asked college students to rate 555 trait descriptions by how much they would like a person displaying these traits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Most Liked Traits

A
  • Kindness
  • Dependability
  • Trustworthiness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Least Liked Traits

A
  • Dishonesty
  • Insincerity
    -Lack of personality warmth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Physical Attractiveness

A

The attractiveness that we assign to others can be thought of as a product of their potential value to us in various contexts

20
Q

Attractiveness and Dating

A

Some deep physical attractiveness as a good predictor of how much someone dates

21
Q

Hatfield Study on Physical Attractiveness

A
  • Did personality tests on a group of students and sent them on blind dates
  • Found physical attractiveness was more important than personality and intelligence for both men and women
22
Q

Matching Phenomenon

A

Tendency for individuals to choose partners who are a “good match” to them in terms of attractiveness and other factors i.e. intelligence

23
Q

Physically Attractive Stereotype

A

-Presumption that physically attractive people possess other sociably desirable traits i.e. intelligence, humor, warmth etc.
-Attractive people are often treated more warmly with elicits certain responses in them

24
Q

‘What is Beautiful is Good’ Stereotype

A

The belief that attractive people are superior in most ways

25
Testosterone and Physical Attractiveness
- One study showed that men with higher levels of testosterone had a higher facial width to height ratio - Width to height ratio associated with men's dominance - Women were more likely to choose men with higher width to height ratios for a second date
26
Facial Symmetry and Physical Attractiveness
- Most people find symmetrical faces to be most attractive - Adaptive as people use face symmetry to evaluate health - One study found that people with greater facial symmetry reported using fewer antibiotics
27
Passionate Love
- A state of intense longing and desire. - An overwhelming urge to be together - Associate with activity in midbrain dopamine systems
28
Companionate Love
A strong commitment based on friendship, love, respect and intimacy
29
Similarity
- Strong indicator of marital success and stability - Those with similar political beliefs tend to get on better - Liking begets perceived similarity. We often assume that those we like share out beliefs and attitudes
30
Newcomb on Similarity
- Studied a group of transfer students in a boarding situation over 13 weeks - Tighter friendships were forged between those who were similar to them in political affiliations
31
Complimentary Theory of Love
-Proposes that people are attracted to those whose needs and dispositions and different to their own and thus form a rounded personality - Not supported by evidence
32
Romantic Love on Steinberg's triangle
- Intimacy and Passion
33
Companionate Love on Steinberg's Triangle
- Intimacy and Commitment
34
Fatuous Love on Steinberg's triangle
- Commitment and passion
35
2 Factor Theory of Emotion
- A given state of arousal can be steered into any of several emotions, depending on how we interpret and label the arousal - Terror can be a stimulus for attraction - The more aroused/ frightened men were more inclined to date the confederate in waiting room
36
Self Monitoring and Love
- High self monitoring personalities tend to be less committed to enduring and committed relationships - Low self monitors tend to be more committed to enduring relationships
37
Attachment Theory
Some evidence suggests that one's attachment style in adulthood is related to their early childhood experiences, particularly parenting
38
Secure Attachment
- Warm, supportive and responsive parents - Find it easy to get close to others and do not fear abandonment
39
Avoidant Attachment
- Cold and distant Parents - Find it difficult to trust or depend on others and are wary to become close to them
40
Ambivalent Attachment
- Inconsistent Parental Treatment - Described as 'clingy'. Worry that people do not really love them and are bound to leave
41
Caveat of Attachment Theory
Findings are mainly based on recollections so can be biased or distorted
42
Four Horsemen of Apocalypse in Dealing with Conflict
- Being overly critical - Holding partner in disdain - Being defensive - Mentally withdrawing from relationship
43
Capitalisation
Deliver criticism lightly and with compassion when things go wrong, whereas they revel in each others successes when things go right
44
Attributional Style in Happy Couples
Attribute good outcomes to each other and bad outcomes to the environment
45
Attributional Style in Unhappy Couples
Attribute bad outcomes to each other and good outcomes to the environment
46
Idealising One's Partner
View their partner in a more positive light than they view other people
47
Accommodation
Overlook bad behaviour or respond constructively