Week 5 - Wages Flashcards
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (a). Definitions. – As used in this Title:
(a). “Person” means an i_____, p_____, a_____, c_____, b_____, l_____, or any o_____.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (a). Definitions. – As used in this Title:
(a). “Person” means an individual, partnership, association, corporation, business trust, legal representatives, or any organized group of persons.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (b). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(b). “Employer” includes […] in relation […] and shall include the […], as well as […].
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (b). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(b). “Employer” includes any person acting directly or indirectly in the interest of an employer in relation to an employee and shall include the government and all its branches, subdivisions and instrumentalities, all government-owned or controlled corporations and institutions, as well as non-profit private institutions, or organizations.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. Definitions. – As used in this Title:
(c). “Employee” includes […].
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. Definitions. – As used in this Title:
(c). “Employee” includes any individual employed by an employer.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (d). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(d). “Agriculture” includes […] and, among other things, includes […], the raising of […], and any […], but does not include the […].
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (d). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(d). “Agriculture” includes farming in all its branches and, among other things, includes cultivation and tillage of soil, dairying, the production, cultivation, growing and harvesting of any agricultural and horticultural commodities, the raising of livestock or poultry, and any practices performed by a farmer on a farm as an incident to or in conjunction with such farming operations, but does not include the manufacturing or processing of sugar, coconuts, abaca, tobacco, pineapples or other farm products.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (e). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(e). “Employ” includes to […].
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (e). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(e). “Employ” includes to suffer or permit to work.
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (f). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(f). “Wage” paid to any employee shall mean […], or other method of calculating the same, which is […] and includes the fair and reasonable value, as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment, of board, lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the employee. “Fair and reasonable value” […].
LC. Book III. Title II Wages. Art. 97. (f). Definitions – As used in this Title:
(xxx xxx)
(f). “Wage” paid to any employee shall mean the remuneration of earnings, however designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece, or commission basis, or other method of calculating the same, which is payable by an employer to an employee under a written or unwritten contract of employment for work done or to be done, or for services rendered or to be rendered and includes the fair and reasonable value, as determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment, of board, lodging, or other facilities customarily furnished by the employer to the employee. “Fair and reasonable value” shall not include any profit of the employer, or to any person affiliated with the employer.
Who prescribes the regional minimum wage rates?
Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards.
Art. 99. Regional Minimum Wages. – The minimum wage rates for agricultural and non-agricultural employees and workers in each and every region of the country shall be those prescribed by the Regional Tripartite Wages and Productivity Boards.
Art. 100. Prohibition Against Elimination or Diminution of Benefits. –
Art. 100. Prohibition Against Elimination or Diminution of Benefits. – N I T B S B C T E O I A W D S, O O E B B E A T T O P O T C.
Art. 101. Payment by Results. – (a). The Secretary of Labor and Employment shall regulate the payment of […], including […], […], and other […], in order to ensure the payment of fair and reasonable wages rates, preferably through time and motion studies or in consultation with representatives of workers’ and employers’ organizations.
Art. 101. Payment by Results. – (a). The Secretary of Labor and Employment shall regulate the payment of wages by results, including pakyao, piecework, and other non-time work, in order to ensure the payment of fair and reasonable wages rates, preferably through time and motion studies or in consultation with representatives of workers’ and employers’ organizations.
What is the definition of “wages”?
Wages are defined as “remuneration or earnings, however designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece or commission basis, or other method of calculating the same, which is payable by an employer to an employee under a written or unwritten contract of employment for work done or to be done, or for service rendered tor to be rendered.” [Labor Code. Art. 97 (f); Chavez v NLRC GR No. 146530].
Does the payment of “wages” or “remuneration” for work done or to be done, ipso facto create an employer-employee relationship between the parties?
No. In Chavez v. NLRC, the Court held:
“That the petitioner was paid on a per trip basis is not significant. This is merely a method of computing compensation and not a basis for determining the existence or absence of employer-employee relationship. One may be paid on the basis of results or time expended on the work, and may or may not acquire an employment status, depending on whether the elements of an employer-employee relationship are present or not.” [Chavez v. NLRC GR No. 146530].
Does the receipt of an allowance on a monthly basis ipso facto characterize the allowance as regular and forming part of salary?
No. In the case of Millares v. NLRC, the Court stated that:
“’Customary’ is founded on long-established and constant practice connoting regularity. The receipt of an aloowance on a monthly basis does not ipso facto characterize it as regular and forming part of salary because the nature of the grant is a factor worth considering.” [Millares v. NLRC GR No. 122827]
When is an allowance deemed as a facility that is part of wages?
“In determining whether a privilege is a facility, the criterion is not so much its kind but its purpose.” If the purpose is for the benefit of the employee, it is part of the wage structure. However, if the benefit is for the employer, then it is not. [Millares v. NLRC GR No. 122827]
Are salary increases part of the wage structure, and therefore demandable when it comes to backwages?
No. Salary increases are not allowances or benefits, and cannot be confused with either. The term “allowances” is sometimes used synonymously with “emoluments,” as indirect or contingent remuneration, which may or may not be earned, but which is sometimes in the nature of compensation, and sometimes in the nature of reimbursement. Allowances and benefits are granted to the employee apart or separate from, and in addition to the wage or salary. In contrast, salary increases are amounts which are added to the employee’s salary as an increment thereto for varied reasons deemed appropriate by the employer. Salary increases are not separate grants by themselves, but once granted, they are deemed part of the employee’s salary. […] [I]f the intent were to include salary increases as basis in the computation of backwages, the same should have been explicitly stated in the same manner that the law used clear and unambiguous terms in expressly providing for the inclusion of allowances and other benefits. [Equitable Banking Corp. v Sadac GR No. 164772]
What is the difference between backwages and separation pay?
“Separation pay is granted where reinstatement is no longer advisable because of strained relations between the employee and the employer. Backwages represent compensation that should have been earned but were not collected because of the unjust dismissal. The bases for computing the two are different, the first being usually the length of the employee’s service and the second the actual period when he was unlawfully prevented from working.” [Equitable Banking Corp. v Sadac GR No. 164772].
What is the distinction between “salary” and “wages”?
None. The Court held that “In labor law, […] the distinction [between salary and wages] appears to be merely semantics.” Salary and wages are synonymous. [Equitable Banking Corp. v Sadac GR No. 164772]
Are commissions part of wages?
Yes. In Toyota Pasig, Inc. v. Vilma S. de Peralta, the Court held that Art. 97 of the Labor Code, defining wages, which states that “’Wage’ paid to any employee shall mean the remuneration of earnings, however, designated, capable of being expressed in terms of money, whether fixed or ascertained on a time, task, piece or commission basis,” expressly includes commissions as part of wages. The Court also cited Iran v. NLRC to discuss the wisdom behind the inclusion of commissions as wages. In Iran the Court said “While commissions are, indeed incentives or forms of encouragement to inspire employees to put a little more industry on the jobs particularly assigned to them, still these commissions are direct remunerations for services rendered.” [Toyota Pasig, Inc. v. Vilma S. de Peralta GR No. 213488].
Are employers allowed to pay wages in forms such as promissory notes?
No. Under Art. 102 Forms of Payment of the Labor Code, it sates: “No employer shall pay the wages of an employee by means of promissory notes, vouchers, coupons, tokens, tickets, chits, or any object other than legal tender, even when expressly requested by the employee.”
When are wages by check or money order allowed?
Payment of wages by check or money order shall be allowed when such manner of payment is customary on the date of effective of [the Labor Code], or is necessary because of special circumstances as specified in appropriate regulations to be issued by the Secretary of Labor and Employment or as stipulated in a collective bargaining agreement. [Labor Code. Art. 102. par. 2].
When shall wages be paid?
Under Art. 103 Time of Payment, “Wages shall be paid at least once every two (2) weeks or twice a month at intervals not exceeding sixteen (16) days.”
What will happen if the employer cannot make payment within the time of once every two (2) weeks or twice a month at intervals not exceeding sixteen (16) days due to circumstances outside the employer’s control?
Under Art. 103 Time of Payment of the Labor Code, “If on account of force majeure or circumstances beyond the employer’s control, payment of wages on or within the time herein provided cannot be made, the employer shall pay the wages immediately after such force majeure or circumstances have ceased.”
The payment of wages of employees engaged to perform a task which cannot be completed in two (2) weeks shall be subject to the following conditions, […]:
(1) […];
(2) […]. [Labor Code. Art. ___].
The payment of wages of employees engaged to perform a task which cannot be completed in two (2) weeks shall be subject to the following conditions, in the absence of a collective bargaining agreement or arbitration award:
(1) That payments are made at intervals not exceeding sixteen (16) days, in proportion to the amount of work completed;
(2) That final settlement is made upon completion of the work. [Labor Code. Art. 103].
Art. 104. Place of Payment. – Payment of wages shall be made […], except as otherwise provided by […].
Art. 104. Place of Payment. – Payment of wages shall be made at or near the place of undertaking, except as otherwise provided by such regulations as the Secretary of Labor and Employment may prescribe under conditions to ensure greater protection of wages.
What is the general rule as regards Direct Payment of Wages to employees? What are the exceptions?
The general rule is that wages shall be paid directly to the workers to whom they are due. The exceptions are: (1) force majeur; or (2) death of the worker. [Labor Code. Art. 105].
LC. Art. 105. Direct Payment of Wages. – Wages shall be paid directly to the workers to whom they are due, except:
(a) In cases of force majeure rendering such payment […] to be determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment in appropriate regulations, in which case, […] under […];
LC. Art. 105. Direct Payment of Wages. – Wages shall be paid directly to the workers to whom they are due, except:
(a) In cases of force majeure rendering such payment impossible or under other special circumstances to be determined by the Secretary of Labor and Employment in appropriate regulations, in which case, the worker may be paid through another person under written authority given by the worker for the purpose;
LC. Art. 105. (b). Direct Payment of Wages. – Wages shall be paid directly to the workers to whom they are due, except:
(xxx xxx)
(b) Where the worker has died, in which case, the employer may […]. The claimants, if they are all of age, shall […], to the exclusion of all other persons. If any of the heirs is a minor, the affidavit shall be […]. The affidavit shall be presented to the employer who shall make payment through the Secretary of Labor and Employment or his representative. The representative of the Secretary of Labor and Employment shall act as referee in dividing the amount paid among the heirs. The payment of wages under this Article shall absolve the employer of any further liability with respect to the amount paid.
LC. Art. 105. (b). Direct Payment of Wages. – Wages shall be paid directly to the workers to whom they are due, except:
(xxx xxx)
(b) Where the worker has died, in which case, the employer may pay the wages of the deceased worker to the heirs of the latter without the necessity of intestate proceedings. The claimants, if they are all of age, shall execute an affidavit attesting to their relationship to the deceased and the fact that they are his heirs, to the exclusion of all other persons. If any of the heirs is a minor, the affidavit shall be executed on his behalf by his natural guardian or next-of-kin. The affidavit shall be presented to the employer who shall make payment through the Secretary of Labor and Employment or his representative. The representative of the Secretary of Labor and Employment shall act as referee in dividing the amount paid among the heirs. The payment of wages under this Article shall absolve the employer of any further liability with respect to the amount paid.