Week 4 - Conditions of Employment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Are the provisions of Book III Title I Working Conditions and Rest Periods applicable to all employees?

A

No. Under Art. 82 of the Labor Code, The provisions of Book III Title I Working Conditions and Rest Periods do not apply to government employees, managerial employees, field personnel, members of the family of the employer who are dependent on him for support, domestic helpers, persons in the personal service of another, and workers who are paid by results as determined by the Secretary of Labor in appropriate regulations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the provisions under Book III Title I Working Conditions and Rest Periods of the Labor Code?

A
  • Art. 82. Coverage;
  • Art. 83. Normal Hours of Work;
  • Art. 84. Hours Worked;
  • Art. 85. Meal Periods;
  • Art. 86. Night-Shift Differential;
  • Art. 87. Overtime Work;
  • Art. 88. Undertime Not Offset by Overtime;
  • Art. 89. Emergency Overtime Work;
  • Art. 90. Computation of Additional Compensation;
  • Art. 91. Right to Weekly Rest Day;
  • Art. 92. When Employer May Require Work on a Rest Day;
  • Art 93. Compensation for Rest Day, Sunday or Holiday Work;
  • Art. 94. Right to Holiday Pay;
  • Art. 95. Right to Service Incentive Leave; and
  • Art. 96. Service Charges.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who are “managerial employees” according to the Art. 82 of the Labor Code?

A

Under Art. 82 par.2: “’[M]anagerial employees’ refer to those whose primary duty consists of the management of the establishment in which they are employed or of a department or subdivision thereof, and to other officers or members of the managerial staff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the conditions in order to deem an employee a managerial employee?

A

In Penaranda v. Baganga Plywood, the Court explained the conditions in order to deem the employee a managerial employee. According to the Court:

“The Implementing Rules of the Labor Code state that managerial employees are those who meet the following conditions:

(1) Their primary duty consists of the management of the establishment in which they are employed or of a department or subdivision thereof;
(2) They customarily and regularly directed the work of two or more employees therein;
(3) They have the authority to hire or fire other employees of lower rank; or their suggestions and recommendations as to the hiring and firing and as to the promotion or any other change of status of other employees are given particular weight.” [Penaranda v. Baganga GR No. 159577].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Does the designation as “manager” render an employee a managerial employee?

A

No. In Asia Pacific Chartering v. Farolan, the Court, citing Paper Industries Corp. v. Laguesma, stated:

“Managerial employees are ranked as Top Managers, Middle Managers and First Line Managers. The mere fact that an employee is designated ”manager” does not ipso facto make him one-designation should be reconciled with the actual job description of the employee for it is the job description that determines the nature of employment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are managerial employees paid by the hour?

A

No. In National Waterworks & Sewage Authority v. NWSA Consodliated Unions, the Court said that managerial employees are not paid by the hour. According to the Court, “The philosophy behind the exemption of managerial employees from the 8-Hour Labor Law is that such workers are not usually employed for every hour of work but their compensation is determined considering their special training, experience or knowledge which requires the exercise of discretion and independent judgment, or perform work related to management policies or general business operations along specialized or technical lines. For these workers it is not feasible to provide a fixed hourly rate of pay or maximum hours of labor.” [National Waterworks & Sewage Authority v. NWSA Consodliated Unions GR No. L-18938].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Art. 82 par. 2. Coverage. — (xxx xxx) As used herein, “managerial employees” refer to those whose […] in which they are employed or of a […] thereof, and to other […].

A

Art. 82 par. 2. Coverage. — (xxx xxx) As used herein, “managerial employees” refer to those whose primary duty consists of the management of the establishment in which they are employed or of a department or subdivision thereof, and to other officers or members of the managerial staff.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who are “field personnel” according to the Labor Code?

A

“Field personnel” shall refer to non-agricultural employees who regularly perform their duties away from the principal place of business or branch office of the employer and whose actual hours of work in the field cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. [Art. 82 Labor Code].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does the performance of work outside the branch office render an employee a “field personnel”?

A

No. According to the case of Auto Bus Transport Systems, Inc. v. Bautista, the Court held “[T]he definition of a ‘field personnel’ is not merely concerned with the location where the employee regularly performs his duties but also with the fact that the employee’s performance is unsupervised by the employer. […] [F]ield personnel are those who regularly perform their duties away from the principal place of business of the employer and whose actual hours of work in the field cannot be determined with reasonable certainty. Thus, in order to conclude whether an employee is a field employee, it is also necessary to ascertain if actual hours of work in the field can be determined with reasonable certainty by the employer. In so doing, an inquiry must be made as to whether or not the employee’s time and performance are constantly supervised by the employer.” [Auto Bus Transport Systems, Inc. v. Bautista GR No. 156367; cited in Far-East Agricultural Supply v. Lebatique].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Why did the Court hold that the fishermen employed under Mercidar Fishing Corp. in Mercidar Fishing Corp v. NLRC were regular employees instead of being field employees?

A

The Court held that the fishermen were regular employees and not field employees because the employees were still under the effective control and supervision of the company, being that the employees had no choice but to stay on the vessel. Thus, the Court said:

“[D]uring the entire course of their fishing voyage, fishermen employed by petitioner have no choice but to remain on board its vessel. Although they perform non-agricultural work away from petitioner’s business offices, the fact remains that throughout the duration of their work they are under the effective control and supervision of petitioner through the vessel’s patron or master as the NLRC correctly held.” [Mercidar Fishing Corp v. NLRC GR No. 112574].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why are employees working on a piece-work basis exempted from overtime pay?

A

In Red V Coconut Products Ltd. v. CIR, the Court, citing Lara v. Del Rosario, explained why piece-workers are exempted from the Eight-Hour Labor Law. The Court stated “[T]he philosophy underlying the exclusion of piece workers from the Eight-Hour Labor Law is that said workers are paid depending upon the work they doirrespective of the amount of time employed’ in doing said work.” [Red V Coconut Products Ltd. v. CIR GR No. L-21348].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the Normal Hours of Work?

A

Labor Code. Art. 83. Normal Hours of Work. – The normal hours of work of any employee shall not exceed eight (8) hours a day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Are mealtime breaks considered working time and therefore compensable?

A

It depends on whether or not the employee’s work is not continuous and that during the meal time break, employees can leave the working place and rest completely. If they can, then it is not considered as working time. However, if they cannot, then it is considered working time, and is compensable.

In National Development Company v. CIR, the Court held “The idle time that an employee may spend for resting and ruing which he may leave the spot or place of work through not the premises of his employer, is not counted as working time only where the work is broken or is not continuous. […] ‘such time for eating can only be segregated or deducted from his work, if the same is not continuous and the employee can leave his owrking place and rest completely.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the normal work hours of health personnel?

A

Labor Code. Art. 83. par. 2. Normal Hours of Work. – (xxx xxx) Health personnel in cities and municipalities with a population of at least one million (1,000,000) or in hospitals and clinics with a bed capacity of at least one hundred (100) shall hold regular office hours for eight (8) hours a day, for five (5) days a week, exclusive of time for meals, except where the exigencies of the service require that such personnel work for six (6) days or forty-eight (48) hours, in which case, they shall be entitled to an additional compensation of at least thirty percent (30%) of their regular wage for work on the sixth day.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Compressed Work Week?

A

Compressed Work Week is an alternative arrangement whereby the normal workweek is reduced to less than six (6) days but the total number of normal work hours per week shall remain at 48 hours. The normal workday is increased to more than eight hours without corresponding overtime premium. This concept can be adjusted accordingly in cases where the normal workweek of the firm is five day. [DOLE Dep’t Advisory No. 02 (2004), Implementation of Compressed Workweek Schemes.].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the maximum number of work hours per day in a Compressed Workweek set-up?

A

12 hours.

“Unless there is a more favorable practice existing in the firm, work beyond eight hours will not be compensable by overtime premium provided the total number of hours worked per day shall not exceed twelve (12) hours. In any case, any work performed beyond 12 hours a day or 48 hours a week shall be subject to overtime premium.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the requisites for a compressed workweek?

A

The requisites of a Compressed Workweek are:

  • Express and voluntary agreement of the majority of the covered employees or their duly authorized representatives;
    • If a firm using substances or chemicals, etc. - certification from an accredited health and safety organization or practitioner or from the firm’s safety committing that it’s safe to work beyond eight hours (it is within the threshold limit);
  • Notify the DOLE
18
Q

Does a laborer need to leave the premises of the factor, shop or boat in order that his period of rest not be counted as working hour?

A

No. In Luzon Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Luzon Marine Department Union, the Court stated “[A] laborer need not leave the premises of the factory, shop or boat in order that his period of rest shall not be counted, it being enough that he ‘cease to work’, may rest completely and leave or or may leave at his will the spot where he actually stays while working, to go somewhere else, whether within or outside the premises of said factory, shop or boat. If these requisites are complied with, the period of rest shall not be counted.” [Luzon Stevedoring Co., Inc. v. Luzon Marine Department Union GR No. L-9265].

19
Q

Is travel to and from office compensable?

A

Generally no. However, in the case of Rada v. NLRC, the Court awarded overtime pay to the petitioner for picking up and dropping off passenger-employees, which was along the route to and from the petitioner’s home. According to the Court, the pick-up and drop-off system of the company was primarily intended for the benefit of the employer and not so much for convenience of the employees. The task of fetching and delivering employees was indispensable and consequently mandatory for the petitioner. Thus, the Court awarded overtime pay for such case. [Rada v. NLRC GR No. 96078].

20
Q

What is the meal time period provided for an employee?

A

According to Article 85 of the Labor Code, at least sixty (60) minutes time-off for regular meals.

21
Q

Labor Code. Article 85. Meal Periods. – Subject to such regulations as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe, it shall be the duty of every employer to give his employees […] for their regular meals.

A

Labor Code. Article 85. Meal Periods. – Subject to such regulations as the Secretary of Labor may prescribe, it shall be the duty of every employer to give his employees not less than sixty (60) minutes time-off for their regular meals.

22
Q

When are meal and rest periods compensable?

A

A meal period is compensable when it is shorter than one (1) hour (but not less than 20 minutes) and:

(a) Where the work is non-manual work in nature or does not involve strenuous physical exertion;
(b) Where the establishment regulary operates not less sixteen hours a day
(c) In cases of actual or impending emergencies or there is urgent work to be performed on machineries, equipment or installations to avoid serious loss which the employer would otherwise suffer; and
(d) Where the work is necessary to prevent serious loss of perishable goods. [Sec. 7, Rule I, Book III, IRR].

23
Q

Are coffee breaks compensable?

A

Yes, when it runes from five (5) to twenty (20) minutes. According to Sec. 7 Rule I Book III of the IRR, “Rest periods or coffee breaks running from five (5) to twenty (20) minutes shall be considered as compensable working time.”

24
Q

Are employees required to take their meals within company premises?

A

No. In PAL v. NLRC, it was held “[T]he eight-hour work period does not include the meal break. Nowhere in the law may it be inferred that employees must take their meals within company premises. Employees are not prohibited from going out of the premises as long as they return to their posts on time.” [PAL v. NLRC GR No. 132805].

25
Q

Why did the Court rule that the meal time was compensable in the case of Pan American World Airways System v. Pan American Employees Association?

A

The Court in Pan American ruled that the meal time for the employees in the said case were compensable. The Court adopted the factual findings of the lower court which said “[D]uring meal period, the mechanics were required to stand by for emergency work; that if they happened not to be available when called, they were reprimanded by the leadman, that as in fact it happened on many occasions.” [Pan American World Airways System v. Pan American Employees Association GR No. L-16275].

26
Q

Why did the Court hold that it was permissible for the company to remove the 30-minute compensable lunch break for employees in the case of Sime Darby Pilipinas Inc., v. NLRC?

A

The Court held that it was permissible because (1) the change of work schedule is a management prerogative; and (2) the new schedule no longer required the employees to be on call. Thus the Court stated:

“The right to fix the work schedules of the employees rests principally on their employer. […] [W]hile the old work schedule included a 30-minute paid lunch break, the employees could be called upon to do jobs during that period as they were ‘on call’. Even if denominated as lunch break, this period could very well be considered as working time because the factory employees were required to work if necessary and were paid accordingly for working. With the new work schedule, the employees are now given a one-hour lunch break without any interruption from their employer.” [Sime Darby Pilipinas Inc., v. NLRC GR No. 119205]

27
Q

Art. 87. Overtime Work. – Work may be performed beyond eight (8) hours a day provided that the employee is paid for the overtime work, an additional compensation equivalent to […]. Work performed beyond eight hours on a holiday or rest day shall be paid an additional compensation equivalent to […].

A

Art. 87. Overtime Work. – Work may be performed beyond eight (8) hours a day provided that the employee is paid for the overtime work, an additional compensation equivalent to his regular wage plus at least twenty-five percent (25%) thereof. Work performed beyond eight hours on a holiday or rest day shall be paid an additional compensation equivalent to the rate of the first eight hours on a holiday or rest day plus at least thirty percent (30%) thereof.

28
Q

LC. Art. 88. Undertime Not Offset by Overtime. – Undertime work on any particular day shall […]. […] shall not exempt the employer from paying the additional compensation required in this Chapter.

A

LC. Art. 88. Undertime Not Offset by Overtime. – Undertime work on any particular day shall not be offset by overtime work on any other day. Permission given to the employee to go on leave on some other day of the week shall not exempt the employer from paying the additional compensation required in this Chapter.

29
Q

LC. Art. 89. (a). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(a) When […] or when […] has been declared by the […].

A

LC. Art. 89. (a). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(a) When the country is at war or when any other national or local emergency has been declared by the National Assembly or the Chief Executive.

30
Q

LC. Art. 89. (b). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(b). When […] or in case of […] in the locality caused by […];

A

LC. Art. 89. (b). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(b). When it is necessary to prevent loss of life or property or in case of imminent danger to public safety due to an actual or impending emergency in the locality caused by serious accidents, fire, flood, typhoon, earthquake, epidemic, or other disaster or calamity;

31
Q

LC. Art. 89. (c). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(c). When there is […], in order to […];

A

LC. Art. 89. (c). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(c). When there is urgent work to be performed on machines, installations, or equipment, in order to avoid serious loss or damage to the employer or some other cause of similar nature;

32
Q

LC. Art. 89. (d). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(d). When […] perishable goods;

A

LC. Art. 89. (d). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(d). When the work is necessary to prevent loss or damage to perishable goods;

33
Q

LC. Art. 89. (e). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(e). Where the […] of the work started […] is necessary to […].

Any employee required to render overtime work under this Article shall be paid the additional compensation required in this Chapter.

A

LC. Art. 89. (e). Emergency Overtime Work. – Any employee may be required by the employer to perform overtime work in any of the following cases:

(xxx xxx)

(e). Where the completion or continuation of the work started before the eighth hour is necessary to prevent serious obstruction or prejudice to the business or operations of the employer.

Any employee required to render overtime work under this Article shall be paid the additional compensation required in this Chapter.

34
Q

LC. Art. 90. Computation of Additional Compensation. – For purposes of computing overtime and other additional remuneration as required by this Chapter, the […], without deduction on account of facilities provided by the employer.

A

LC. Art. 90. Computation of Additional Compensation. – For purposes of computing overtime and other additional remuneration as required by this Chapter, the “regular wage” of an employee shall include the cash wage only, without deduction on account of facilities provided by the employer.

35
Q

Is overtime pay part of the basic salary of employees (and therefore included in the computation of 13th month pay)?

A

No. In Letran Calamba Faculty and Employees Association v. NLRC, the Court held “[P]ayment for overtime work and work performed during special holidays is considered as additional compensation apart and distinct from an employee’s regular wage or basic salary, an overload pay, owing to its very nature and definition, may not be considered as part of a teacher’s regular or basic salary, because it is being paid for additional work performed in excess of the regular teaching load.” [Letran Calamba Faculty and Employees Association v. NLRC GR No. 156225].

36
Q

What is the requirement in order to consider work as overtime work?

A

“In order that work may be considered as overtime work, the hours worked must be in excess of an in addition to the eight (8) hours worked during the prescribed daily work period, or the forty (40) hours worked during the regular work week Monday thru Friday.” [Caltex Regular Employees, etc. v. Caltes (Phils.) Inc. GR No. 111359].

37
Q

Why did the Court not include the COLA as basis for computation of overtime work in the case of PNB v. PNB Employees Ass’n?

A

The Court did not include the COLA as basis for computation of the overtime pay because overtime pay for extra effort beyond that contemplated in the employment contract. Thus, additional pay given for any other purpose cannot be included in the basis for the computation of overtime pay.

According to the Court, absent a specific provision in the CBA, the bases for computation of overtime pay are two (2) computations, namely:

  1. W/N the additional pay is for extra work done or service rendered; and
  2. W/N the same is intended to be permanent and regular, not contingent nor temporary as a given only to remedy a situation which can change any time. [PNB v. PNB Employees Ass’n GR No. L-30279].
38
Q

What is the requirement in order to allow a worker entitled for overtime pay?

A

In Lagatic v. NLRC, the Court held that “Entitlement to overtime pay must first be established by proof that said overtime work was actually performed, before an employee may avail of said benefit.” [Lagatic v. NLRC GR No. 121004].

39
Q

What is the proper way to determine the overtime work/pay of a seafarer?

A

According to the case of PCL Shipping Phils. Inc. v. NLRC, the Court held that “the correct criterion in determining whether or not sailors are entitle to overtime pays is not whether they were on board and can not leave ship beyond the regular eight working hours a day, but whether they actually rendered service in excess of said number of hours.” [PCL Shipping Phils. Inc. v. NLRC GR No. 153031].

40
Q

LC. Art. 86. Night-Shift Differential. – Every employee shall be paid a night shift differential of […] between […] in the morning.

A

LC. Art. 86. Night-Shift Differential. – Every employee shall be paid a night shift differential of not less than ten percent (10%) of his regular wage for each hour of work performed between ten o’clock in the evening and six o’clock in the morning.

41
Q

What is the requirement in order to be entitled to payment for night shift differential (and overtime pay)?

A

Similar to overtime pay. “The correct criterion in determining they are entitled to overtime pay or night shift differential is not whether they were on board and cannot leave ship beyond the regular eight working hours a day, but whether they actually rendered service in excess of said number of hours. In this case, petitioners failed to submit sufficient proof that overtime and night shift work were actually performed to entitle them to the corresponding pay.” [Dacut v. CA GR No. 169434].