week 4- INPUT EFFECTS THE IMPORTANCE OF WORDS Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

what does salient mean

A

noticeable, stands out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What might impact the salience of speech?

A

Repetition: words/sounds/constructions that are most frequent are learned earlier

Stress: words/syllables/constructions that are stressed are learned earlier

Pitch: words produced with a higher pitch or wider pitch range are learned earlier

Isolation: words produced in isolation are learned earlier

Hyperarticulation- exaggerating phonological features to make them more distinct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which features of IDS do infants prefer?

A

Fernald & Kuhl (1987)
Three experiments designed to test this:
1) Fundamental frequency (perceived pitch) of IDS vs. ADS
2) Amplitude of IDS vs. ADS
3) Duration of IDS vs. ADS
Synthesised speech was used to omit all lexical content
IDS and ADS samples were created for each condition
20 American 4-month-olds were tested using a HPP design

ADS: lower pitch, narrower pitch range
IDS: higher pitch, wider pitch range

Infants attended longer to IDS sample in fundamental frequency trial

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how does IDS supports word segmentation

A

Thiessen, Hill & Saffran, 2010
40 infants age 0;6-0;7, half participated in IDS condition, half in ADS condition
In the familiarization phase, infants heard an artificial language played in either IDS or ADS
All infants were tested on the same stimuli using HPP:
◦ Part-words heard in familiarization
◦ Full-words heard in familiarization
- Infants in the IDS condition attended longer to the stimuli overall
- Infants in the IDS condition attended longer to the whole words → this suggests that they segmented the artificial language accurately
- Infants in the ADS condition showed no difference → at 6-7 months, IDS might be particularly important in word learning and segmentation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what did Ma et al discover about how IDS supports word learning?

A

48 infants age 1;9
Trained on novel word-novel object pairs, presented in IDS and ADS
Tested using the preferential looking paradigm (eye tracking): how long did they attend to the target object?
16 infants age 2;3 tested on ADS speech only
- Presented with two objects, one that they were familiar with and one that was not common.
- They know what a spoon is, so when presented with a ‘blick’ they should look towards the other object.

Younger infants learned the words in the IDS condition only
Older infants learned words in ADS condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

discuss the IDS feedback loop

A

mother–IDS–infant–response–mother…

• IDS is important in language development
• But for some populations it is less relevant; some atypically developing infants are not as sensitive to acoustic features of the speech stream
- Deaf children: no use of IDS
- Children with autism: not as sensitive to input
- Dyslexic children: can’t receive full acoustic info
• Infants mediate caregiver IDS via a ‘feedback loop’
- Caregivers can recalibrate to create a learning environment that is tailored to that individual
• Infants who are not sensitive to IDS do not send positive feedback to their mothers
→ mothers do not exaggerate their speech in the same way.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

discuss a study based around Cultural Interpretations

A

Cristia et al., 2017
Speech to forager-farmer children in Belize (forager community):
Tsimane villagers in Bolivia recorded in parent-child interactions
Comparisons across children aged between 0 and 11 years

Some cultures e.g.Tzeltal Mayan,do not use typical features of IDS and their children still learn to speak
Some families opt to avoid using ‘babytalk’ and their children still learn to speak
IDS is not a prerequisite to language use
It supports learning, and may be beneficial to some children in some contexts
Added benefits of bonding supported by maternal sensitivity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what are some language specific effects?

A

→ Finnish infants’ early words contain geminates (long consonants) while English infants’ (usually) don’t.
→ Polish infants produce more complex clusters
→ By the 25-word-point, French, English and Welsh infants have acquired language-specific stress patterns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what does truncate mean

A

to cut short, to chop off a syllable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does the ambient language affect children’s speech errors?

A

Infants frequently truncate early polysyllables

Language-specific trends can be observed in line with the stress pattern of the ambient language

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the WEIRD problem?

A
Populations from societies that are: 
• Western 
• Educated 
• Industrialized 
• Rich 
• Democratic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

which types of children learn quicker than others?

A

◦ Males vs. females
◦ Low SES vs. high SES (SES= social economic status)
◦ African American infants vs. white American infants
◦ North American vs. Mayan or Asian infants
◦ Infants of older vs. younger mothers
◦ First-born vs. later-born infants
◦ Infants of depressed mothers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

discuss a study around Variability in Lexical Development

A

Eriksson et al., (2012)
• 13,783 European children from 10 non-English-speaking countries
• Data taken from CDIs
• Age 0;8 to 2;6

  • Girls produced more word types than boys
  • The extent of this difference varied by language
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is CDI

A

communicative development inventory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

discuss a study based around SES differences in language development

A

Fernald, Marchman & Weisleder, (2012)
• 48 English-learning infants
• Studied longitudinally, from 1;6-2;0
• Low-SES and high-SES families compared
• CDI results used to show productive vocabularies
• Looking-while-listening paradigm used to show language processing

• Higher-SES infants did better in both measures at both time-points
- faster reaction time = faster processing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

discuss a study around Birth order differences in language development:

A

Laing & Bergelson
• 44 American infants
- Groups of 0 siblings, 1 sibling and 2+ siblings.
• Longitudinal study between age 0;6 to 1;6
• CDI forms as an ‘off-line’ measure of productive vocabulary
• Audio and video recordings as an ‘on-line’ measure of productive vocabulary
• Infants grouped according to number of older siblings: 0, 1, or 2+

No difference between infants with 0 and 1 sibling
• Infants with 2 or more siblings much slower to develop their vocabulary
- Infants with 2+ siblings are exposed to almost half as many words

17
Q

discuss the word gap

A

By age 3, children from low-SES homes have been exposed to 30 million fewer words than high-SES children!

Input (both types and tokens) is the strongest predictor of vocabulary at age 3 years

Vocabulary at age 3 is a predictor of literacy at age 8 (Head et al., 2016)
Literacy is a strong predictor of overall school achievement

18
Q

what are types

A

number of words, quality of input

19
Q

what are tokens

A

total number of words, quantity of input