Week 4-Emotion Flashcards
Define Emotion
“Cognitive evaluations, subjective changes, autonomic and neural arousal…
…that have effects on behaviour”
Major theories in emotion research
Darwin’s Theory of the Evolution of Emotion (1872)-
Darwin’s theory of emotion focused on the communicative value of outward displays of emotion
Later models focused on the relationship between physiological arousal and emotion
James-Lange Peripheral Feedback Theory(1880)-The James-Lange model states that perception of bodily changes produce the emotional experience
Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion(About 1920s)-The Cannon-Bard model states that perception of a stimulus elicits physiological reaction and emotional reaction simultaneously
‘Two factor’ model of emotion-Schachter and Singer (1960s)-Cognitive Revolution in Psychology
The Schacter-Singer ‘Two factor’ model states that emotion is determined by cognitive labelling PLUS physiological arousal
How are emotions linked to motivation?
Emotions are often associated with motivation to act
e. g. anger -> ‘fight’
e. g. fear/anxiety ->‘flight’ / ‘freeze’
Emotions are GOAL DIRECTING and can be a goal in themselves
e. g. avoid anxiety-provoking situation
e. g. look for happiness
Emotions affect cognition
Link: emotions and decision making
Distinguishing between motivation and emotion is difficult
Darwin’s Theory of the Evolution of Emotion (1872)
-Focuses on the Outward expression of emotion
Proposes that these are:
-A product of evolution -> similarities across species
-INNATE -> e.g. still shown by individuals born blind
‘Serviceable’ -> Have a practical function E.g., Fear expression widens the visual field
-Communicative function -> Enables one animal to interpret the emotion of another
– expressions might evolve to enhance their communicative function and their original physiological function might be lost
Darwin’s Theory of the Evolution of Emotion (1872)
-Focuses on the Outward expression of emotion
Proposes that these are:
-A product of evolution -> similarities across species
-INNATE -> e.g. emotion showed by individuals born blind
-‘SERVICEABLE’ -> Have a practical function E.g., Fear expression widens the visual field
-COMMUNICATIVE function -> Enables one animal to interpret the emotion of another
– expressions might evolve to enhance their communicative function and their original physiological function might be lost
What is Darwin’s principle of Antithesis?
Principle of Antithesis: Opposite messages are often signalled by opposite movements and postures
James-Lange Peripheral Feedback Theory(1880s)
How did emotions come about?
Stimulus–>Perception–>Bodily Arousal—>Emotion
E.g.Stimulus (a tiger)–>Perception(Interpretation of stimulus-danger)–>(Pounding heart)–>(Fear)
-Idea: It is PERCEPTION OF BODILY CHANGES that PRODUCE the emotional experience(Bodily Mechanism/response-physiological response causes emotion)
-Changes in bodily state occur BEFORE the emotional experience
-Experience of emotion is our awareness of our bodily (physiological) responses to emotion-arousing stimuli: “I am trembling. Therefore I am afraid”
Evidence for James-Lange Peripheral Feedback Theory(1880s)
Evidence was mostly from introspection and correlational research
Cannon-Bard Theory of Emotion(About 1920s)
Idea: Perception of a stimulus elicits a physiological reaction and emotional reaction simultaneously
The physical reaction isn’t dependent on the emotional reaction, and vice versa
I see a snake –> I am afraid, and I begin to tremble.
Stimulus–>Perception–>Emotion response AND Bodily Arousal (not one after the other; HAPPENS AT THE SAME TIME, one doesn’t depend on the other)
Both theories state the importance of physiological arousal.
Is physiological arousal necessary for emotion?
Spinal Cord Injury
- Affects the generation of sympathetic nervous system responses
- Affects sensory feedback of body state
Emotional experience?
Some evidence that this dampens emotional experience - decline in the intensities of feelings of anger and fear in patients, dependent on how
high up the injury (e.g., Hohmann, 1966)
Condition: Pure Autonomic Failure
- organ activity continues but the nervous system no longer regulates them
Report less intense emotions (Critchley, Mathias & Dolan, 2001
‘Two factor’ model of emotion-Schachter and Singer (1960s)
Accepts that bodily arousal is primary(important) in emotions. BUT - thisarousalis the same for a wide variety of emotions, so physical arousal alone cannot explain the range of emotions we experience
A cognitive ‘label’ is also required
When a bodily state occurs, we look for cues in the environment to explain why we feel the way we do
- Degree of bodily arousal influences the INTENSITY of emotion
- Perception and thought about a stimulus influence the type of emotion
Schachter & Singer’s model (1962)
COGNITIVE LABELLING ONTOP OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AROUSAL
Told participants the aim of the experiment was to test a new drug on eyesight.
Actually injected with adrenaline –>adrenaline typically increases blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate etc.
Role of context- Environmental cues (euphoric or anger context of confederate)Side effects of the drug as happy or anger dependent on the environment. DON’T KNOW HOW to INTERPRET THIS, looked at environmental cues-.
-vs:
Difficult to replicate the study
Marshall and Zimbardo (1979) found that the behaviour of the confederate had little impact.
In addition, the adrenaline produced arousal which was negatively perceived.
Maslach (1979) also attempted to replicate Schachter and Singer’s study, using hypnotic suggestion as the source of arousal. Unexplained arousal was again perceived negatively in all conditions
Overall, evidence is lacking (Cotton, 1981, ‘A review of research on Schachter’s theory of emotion and the misattribution of Arousal’ European Journal of Social Psychology11(4):365 – 397)
Evaluation of Emotion Theories
These theories focused on the relationship between bodily states, cognition and emotion
They are largely theoretical
-What about the brain regions involved in emotion?
Lesion studies and newer techniques (e.g. fMRI of brain damage) have told us much about the neural basis of emotion
Prefrontal cortex role in regulating emotions
Evidence for prefrontal involvement in emotion regulation
Ochsner et al. (2002) presented highly negative images either:-
Passive viewing condition
‘Reappraisal’ condition (view them ‘unemotionally’)
Lateral prefrontal cortex was activated when reappraising
Reappraisal reduced self-reported arousal ratings and amygdala activity
What does the prefrontal cortex do and what happens if it is damaged?
Dense interconnections between the amygdala and prefrontal cortex; PFC can inhibit amygdala
Damage to prefrontal regions = disinhibited/inappropriate expression of emotion (e.g. Phineas Gage – Guided learning)
Prefrontal cortex can dampen amygdala activity (phobia treatment see anxiety lecture)
PFC = important for regulating emotion