week 4 Flashcards
Biomaterial associated infection (BAI) –
mostly by staphylococcus epidermidid and S. aureus
Race for the surface
the sooner the biomaterial gets coated by own cells, the lower the chance of bacteria colonizing the surface
biofilms
- Quorum sensing – small molecules by bacteria can be recognized
- Difficult to phagocytose
- Not effectively reached by all antibiotics
- In dormant state less susceptible to antibiotics
- Persisters
- A persisting inflammatory stimulus
Mouse soft tissue BAI model
- Implantation
- Challenge
- Eplantation
- Biopsy for quantitative culture (BM segment sonicated, homogenized tissue), histology, cytokines, mRNA
Localization of s epidermitidis
not on surface but in deep tissue. S epidermidis in tissue resist antibiotics. Stay in immune cells, are not killing.
In human catheter infections
high positive culture levels in skin, also in areas not in direct contact with biomaterial. 44% positive, mostly s epidermidis and e faecalis
Anti LTA staining
colors gram positive bacteria, test to esclude chance of contamination
S aureus in bone tissue
- Intracellular; long term osteomyelitis patient
- Canaliculi – can even deform to fit structure. Not only surface but also in bone holes
Biomaterial associated infection (BAI)
- Mostly caused by staphylococci
- Biofilm
- Peri implant tissue colonization
Foreign body response –
from proinflammatory to anti inflammatory. In specific order immune cells accumulate, orchestrated by cytokines
* mononuclear leukocytes
* neutrophils
* macrophages
* foreign body giant cells (fused macrophages)
regulation foreign body response hindrance
by pram positive bacterial cell wall. strong inducer inflammation. Depends on combination of physical and chemical combination of material and bacteria, can lead to pro-inflammatory or anti inflammatory response.
SEpvp (coating)
too strong pro inflammatory result, protracted inflammatory phase (longer), strong delay in foreign body response
PApvp (coating)
giant cells visible after 14 days, but cultures grow and get incapsulated, dangerous with even systemic dissemination in murine models, sepsis. Localized in cluster like cells
low IFN
Spreading
Systemic disease
Sepsis
Orchestrate local immunity
develop materials which host proper response, resulting in infection free healing
Release systems antimicrobial coating
release antimicrobials
contact killing
anti adhesive
combinations
high IFN
Strong pro-inflammatory reaction
Protracted inflammatory phase
Strong delay in Foreign body response
Considerations for release
- Railord to expected pathogen
- Release profile tailored to desired protected area and required concentrations
- Initial burst release, sustained release for sufficient period
- Reservoir of antimicrobial sufficient to realise the above
- Coating sufficiently attached
- Active in vivo situation
- Biocompatible
- Mechanism of release; diffusion, controlled release, biodegradable (but what if antimicrobial is released and coating not yet degraded), triggered
Novel antimicrobial approaches
- BALI – biofilm alliance
- Superactive; supramolecular biomaterials with antimicrobial and regenerative activity
- PRINT-AID – development of 3d printed devices with antimicrobial properties to prevent biomaterial infections
Synthetic antimicrobial and antibiofilm peptides (SAAP)
- Derived from human cathelicidin LL37
- OP145 is synthetic derived from P60 with impreoved helicity and amphipathicity; antimicrobial and antibiofilm. Plasma inhibits action of OP145
PLEX OP 145 controlled release coating
Combination lipids and polymers makes it stable, OP145 10%. In first 10 days 60% released, after that more slowly – burst first. Later improved activity SAAPS in presence of plasma due to optimization without resistance, prevents biofilm formation.
Novel ll37 derived SAAPs
broad spectrum, active in PBS and plasma AANVULLEN
Novel antimicrobial SuperActive (regenerative capacity biomaterial)
prevent infection and let tissue regenerate. Base polymer and stacking parts (SAAP). Materials can be dipcoated, effect was not complete elimination of the pathogens
Supramolecular UPy based materials
* Simple mix and match
* Retained activity SAAP148
* Incorporation into solid materials
3d printing antimicrobial devices
Antimicrobial agent and biomaterial can be made to fit the patient. Control of drug loading and release by adjusting layers. Advantage 10-100x higher concentration, minimal systemic effects. Disadvantage; not enough drug biomaterial options due to heat and sollluability, mixed on stage, antimicrobial resistance.
PRINT-AID Solutions:
Local administration of gentamicin
sulphate (GS) in an 3D-printed PCL
coating
Tailored polymer-SAAP release system by
Droplet-on-demand printing
Droplet on demand coat Ti bone plate SAAP148
active against MDR bacteria and biofilm formation. Droplet size controlled by pressure and nozzle opening. Release from one layer almost completed in first day, cumulative release only 13%
Coxiella burnettii
- Obligatory intracellular = replicate inside cells
- Enter via receptor mediated endocytosis
- Come into Coxiella containing vacuole CCV
CCV coxiella containing vacuole
- Small cell variants (SCVs) – metabolic inactive, resistant and extracellular
- After invasion large cell variants (LCV) – metabolic active, intracellular, acidification triggers transcription
what does c burnetti infect
macrophages via actin-dependent phagocytosis
Alfavbeta3
- Normally Involved in apoptotic cells via phagocytosis
- C burnetti inhibits inflammation – silent infection
- Adhesion of Coxiella is unknown protein
Host cell modulation
- Binding receptor, uptake of c burnetti
- Nasant CCV (coxiella containing vacuole) is formed, phagosome and lysosome interact (no fusion), vacuole becomes larger and bacteria replicate in this low pH
Mature CCV
- Heavily loaded with bacteria – large will transform to small
- Retains capacity to fuse and expand
- Now also anti apoptotic markers
Coxiella has secretion apparatus
- Needle like structure, injects effector proteins into host cells
- Can manipulate host cells to not combat bacteria anymore
Defect in organelle traficing (Dot) intracellular multiplication (Icm)
- Secretion system
- Encoded on islands with relatively low CG contents
- Eukaryotic protein motifs
- Effector protein secreted
- Polymorphic regions between pathotypes
How does it work (Dot and Icm)
- Regulate transcription
- Translocation efficiency
- Protein stability
- Expressed after 8h and require low pH
- prmAB important for regulation transcription
functional assays used to test function prmAB
made a knock out of prmAB and placed cells in medium, no difference. Inside cells huge difference
how dows prmAB work
- pmrA box like a fur box? To test first see if it binds to promotor region – fusion prm and lux (fluorescent). Knock out no translation so it binds there
- regulates transcription
(low pH stimulus)
Protein domains point to function
- Anti apoptosis
- Ubiquitylation
- Lipid metabolism
- Membrane trafficking
cell wall synthesis
penicillins, cephalosporins, bacitracin, vancomycin
Nucleic acid replication
quinolones, rifampin
Protein synthesis
chloramphenicol, erythromycin, tetracyclins, streptomycin
Plasma membrane
polymyxin B
Synthesis essential metabolites
sulfonamide, trimethoprim
Types of antibiotic resistance
- Intrinsic resistance – vooral gram negatief difficult, has to go through pore in outer membrane or dissolve. Efflux pump is present and PBPs (penicillin binding protein)
- Target site changes – AB targets protein, comes from gene. Mutation where AB cannot bind anymore, or if other compound binds enzyme.
- Direct interactions with AB
PBPs
binds penicillin, those are peptidoglycan synthases and get inactivated by binding penicillin. PBP gets inactivated – destruction cell wall
Multi drug resistance (MDR) efflux pumps gram negative bacteria; resistance nodulation division (RND) expression factors
Baseline of expression of proteins of the pump; Acr expression controlled by TetR repressor, can be overruled by AraC family transcription factor. araC is repressed by multi antibiotic resistance (MAR) protein MarR
Antibiotics effect on pump
usually bind to MarR protein, derepression, expression pump system
Highly resistant bacteria due to which mutation
TetR repressor mutation
MRSA expression PBP2a
- Horizontal gene transfer from s epidermidis
- PBP has different structure, but peptidoglycan synthesis not affected
Rifampicin resistance
RNA polymerase binding. High frequency rifampicin resistance, s epidermis. Not gradient loss of effect rifampicin, not functional at all anymore
Target site mutation rpoB
RNA polymerase of m tuberculosis causing rifampicin resistance
tetM
target site protection against tetracyclin. Normally binding to site in ribosome where translation normally starts, not with tetM, binding but function not affected
steric hindrance
binding without destroying
inactivation by hydrolysis
beta lactam and beta lactamases. Only carbapenem left
counteracting beta lactamase –
clavulanic acid. Blocks beta lactamases even in resistant bacteria (by inhibiting enzyme that gets produced by bacteria). In itself it is a beta lactam drug, not antibacterial so needs to be given together with AB
* with amoxicilline – augmentin
* with ticarcillin – co-ticarclav
* however, carbapenemases are still not susceptible to beta lactamase blockers
beta lactamases
- ampC – inactivates 2/3 gen cephalosporin, Enterobacter and serratia, chromosomal inducible or constitutive
- ESBL – also 2/3 gen cephalosporins, plasmid localized (can spread)
- Inactivation by clavulanic acid variable
Resistance to beta lactam
- Efflux
- Direct interaction; ESBL, carbapenemases
- Target site changes (MRSA)
Intrinsic resistance AB
- Prevent influx
- Efflux