week 2 Flashcards
HIV1
- Lentivirus met envelop
- 2 ssRNA
AIDS
- CD4 under 20 cells per ul
- Opportunistic - canditis
- Cancers – lymphoma, karposi sarcoma
- Dementia
What determines rate of HIV1 infection
- Virus
- Immune response
- Genetic background
HIV1 diversity
- Reverse transcription RNA to dsDNA. Lacks proofreading
- Knipt host DNA en plakt eigen er in
- Increased fitness through escape ctl, neutralizing ab, antiviral drugs. Selection pressure
Relevance hiv diversity
- Clinical course; viral fitness and coreceptor use, excape ctl
- Effctivity antiretroviral therapy
- Diagnostics (primer binding, antibody
binding) - Envelop based vaccine design
Binding HIV1 to T cel
- CD4
- CXCR4 or CXCR5 (alleen op macrofaag) as co receptor. Has v3 loop. Negative charges then ccr5 use, positive charges then cxcr4 use
- Can also infect macrophages
Difference x4 and r5 hiv expression in disease progression
If you have x4 then you have r5 virus aswell (shown by evolution). Having both lead to increase disease progression by accelerated loss of cd4, because naive T cells can be infected aswell.
CCR5 genetic variation
32 base base pair deletion. Cannot get infected if homozygous normally, only a few found. Heteozygous not any difference in infection, but difference in disease outcome.
Host genetics in HIV infection
using SNP detection in typical and fast progressors. Grootste verschil in HLA; b57/27 langzaam, B35 rapid disease
Loss of immune control in hiv1 infection
- Escape ctl; TL9 epitope mutation at beginning affects presentation. TL9 epitope mutation in middle affects recognition.
Natural control of hiv1 -
Protective HLA alleles
HLA B57 (for positive immune control HIV)
* Presentation of viral epitopes from conserved regions of the virus
* High affinity recognition of presented peptides by TCR at low amounts
* Viral escape occurs in immune dominant epitopes -> viral attenuation (milder)
* Strong immune response by cd8
* Escape from cd8 occurs and is associated with viral attenuation
Humoral immunity HIV with neutralizing Ab
Nab response is not associated with disease progression
HIV1 sensitivity to autologous Nab – HIV1 escapes
Search for hiv vaccine
Sterilizing immunity – preventing virusses coming in and establishing infections.
Why we don’t have a vaccine for HIV
- Viral sequence, antigenic variation
- Env defense against neutralizing Ab – complex has 6 subunits, noncovalently bound, unstable
- Viral defenses against cellular immunity
- (e.g., MHC Class I down-regulation by Nef).
4. Infection of immune cells, high replication rates and rapid development of
viral reservoirs
Common epitopes are recognized by roadly neutralizing antibodies – why not use this as a vaccine
but in vaccination not usefull because you need to vaccinate for a long time, maybe see response in 25%
Overview aids vaccine design
- Best option for working durable response – normally inactivated or life attenuated because this can reactivate, too dangerous.
- Subunit vaccine – first monomeric with no protection at all, then recombinant dimer did not work
- Recombinant viral vector – best platform to induce T cell response. Ad5 with structural proteins. More infections in vaccine group. HVTN505 made no difference
- Combination subunit and viral vector – first induce T cell response then boost. Results are better, sig difference, 31% lower chance of infection. Follow up no difference
Why no response – research using reverse vaccinology
- Tried gp120, uncleaved gp140 (more subunits), gp140Fd (bound together), SOSIP664 gp 140
- SOSIP664 gp 140 in animals could elicit neutralizing antibodies in animals
Future HIV vaccine - Strategies to induce braodly neutralizing Ab
- Scaffold to prime, then recognise whole protein
- Overcoming viral diversity by using engineerd protein
- Mimicing natural infection
What HIV learned from sars cov
now focussing on HIV
Passive vaccination for hiv
adding Ab instead of eliciting them
* Would have to give every 2-3 weeks, maybe alter so that they circulate for 6 months
* Didnt see big difference, but Ab used was also not very broad.
* Suppresion of viral load when given 3 different Ab
antiretroviral drugs – stop viral replication. classes
- First class; Entry inhibitors – block interaction CD4/cxcr5
- Reverse transcriptase inhibitors – block viral replication in early steps
- Integrase inhibitor – blocks enzymatic protein of virus
- Second class; Protease inhibitors – stops particle formation
Development of drug resistance
due to variability and mutation rate
* Drug will only leave resistant HIV particles
* Combination of classes of treatment is necessary and high treatment adherence