Week 4 Flashcards

1
Q

Ways companies always mismanage risk (6)

A
  1. Relying on historical data
  2. Focusing on narrow measures
  3. Overlooking knowable risks
  4. Overlooking concealed risks
  5. Failing to communicate
  6. Not managing in real time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ways to overlook knowable risks

A
  • risks outside the normal risk class
  • risks incurred by hedging
  • market concentration risks
  • value assumption risks
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

You understand your causal model and can predict the outcome of your decision with reasonable certainty

A

Conventional capital-budgeting tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

You understand your causal model and can predict a range of possible outcomes

A

Quantitive multiple scenario tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

You don’t understand your causal model, but you can predict a range of outcomes

A

Case-based decision analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

You don’t understand your causal model and you can’t predict a range of outcomes

A

Case-based decision analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

You understand your causal model but cannot predict outcomes

A

Qualitative scenario analysis supplemented with case-based decision analysis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Causal model

A

Strong understanding of what critical success factors and economic conditions, in what combination, will lead to a successful outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conventional capital-budgeting tools

A

Use cashflows to make decisions (discounted cash flow, expected rate of return, NPV models)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Quantitative multiple scenario tools

A

Specify possible outcomes and their probability (Monte Carlo, decision analysis, real options)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Qualitative scenario analysis tools

A

Develop a set of qualitative scenarios of how the present may evolve into the future and identifies the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Case-based decision analysis

A

Provides an approach to aggregating and synthesizing information from past experiences and examples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Limitations to use of information markets (2)

A
  • Information and prediction makets can only be used when executives are able to specify a range of possible outcomes
  • Information may leak out
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Alternatives to information markets (2)

A
  • Incentives estimates

- Similarity-based forecasting

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Risk

A

Known probability distribution for the event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ambiguity

A

Not clear what events and probabilities are relevant

17
Q

Utility

A

Weighted average of the utility in each possible state

18
Q

Assumptions of game theory (4)

A
  • All actors behave rationally & try to win
  • All actors are interdependent
  • All actors are aware of their interdependence
  • All actors know all moves that are possible
19
Q

Dominant strategy

A
  • Outperforms all other strategies regardless of rival’s actions
  • Might nog be highest possible pay-off, but you always win
20
Q

Dominated strategy

A

Always lose regardless of what the actor does

21
Q

Equilibrium

A

Each actor gets best possible payoff given the rivals’ responses

22
Q

Tit for that

A
  • Always start with cooperation
  • If rival attacks, you counterattack, then try cooperation again
  • Responses should be proportional
23
Q

Conditions that hinder cooperation (3)

A
  • Large number of competitors
  • Substantial differences between actors
  • Lack of transparency