Week 3: Threatening processes Flashcards

1
Q

australia’s level of threats

A

Australia’s species are often more threatened by different factors than species are at a global level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

indirect drivers of threats

A

Economic
Demographic
Sociopolitical
Cultural and religious
Science and technology
These things feed into: consumption per capita, population and resource intensity which feed into demand for food and demand for energy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

direct drivers: fed by demand for food and demand for energy

A

Over-exploitation
Habitat change
Nutrient loading and pollution
Invasive species
Climate change
These lead to: loss of biodiversity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pressure-State-Response model

A

A cycle

Pressure: human activities change the environment
Can provide information and lead to a response
Can provide pressures on the state

State: the environment and natural resources; prompts institutional response
Can provide resources for human activities
Can provide information for a response

Response: policies and action; affects human activities
Can lead to decisions and actions that change the state
Can have social responses that worsen pressure

Indicators:
Monitor pressures: pesticide use….
Monitor state: levels of active residues in dung, dead dung beetles, reduced nutrient cycling…
Monitor response: research, improved techniques, better control of overuse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

DPSIR - invasive species

A

Pressure: Dynamics of pathways and instability factors; propagule and individual pressure

State: abundance and distribution; effects on ecosystem services

Response: adaption, mitigation, do nothing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

extinct and threatened in Australia

A

> 10% endemics extinct
Further 21% threatened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

ultimate threat factors

A

Transformation of indigenous land management to pastoralism
Non-native species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

intermediary mechanisms

A

Change in fire regime
Livestock and feral stock
Exotic pasture grasses and weeds
Native predators interact with non-native predators
Cane toads
Black rats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

proximate factors threats

A

Habitat change
Increased predation
Poisoning
Novel disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

pastoralism causes

A

Over grazing
Tree removal
Water points
Dingoes targeted
Introduced pasture plants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

exotic meso-predators

A

Cat and fox introduction and spread correlates with declines across the continent
Mammals in decline are between 35g and 5.5kg

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

changed fire regime

A

Aboriginal regime - regular, fine-scale, patchwork burning
Current regime - fire suppression, exotic plants changed regime, infrequent severe fires, reduced habitat mosaics, loss of fire-tolerant plants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

major threats in Australia

A

Other exotics
Land cleaning
Altered water regimes
Climate change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

consequences of change in Australia

A

Soil compaction
Reduced resources
Competition with introduced species
Reduced cover and exotic plant spread
Reduced recruitment of many native trees and shrubs
Meso-predator release

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

PSR model in australia

A

Pressure: pastoralism, exotic predators, changed fire regimes
State: mammal declines and extinctions
Response: fox baiting, sensing, translocation, cat culling, research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what are the interactions with predators?

A

Habitat-mediated pathways
Community-mediated pathways

17
Q

how do we increase resilience?

A

Strategic burning can increase habitat complexity
Dingoes reduce predation pressure

18
Q

prioritising threat management description

A

What threats and where to manage?
Maximise the overall benefit
Efficient as possible
Avoid catastrophic outcomes
Maximise opportunities

19
Q

assumptions of prioritising threat management description

A

Management of threats is successful
All sites are independent
Distributions are known
Costs are known

20
Q

cost-benefit approach for threats

A

Benefit depends on:
Number of species affected by threat
Proportion of available habitat treated
Number of threats
Cost:
Grazing - loss of profits
Fox baiting - cost of implementation

21
Q

functional groups, types of guilds

A

A group of species that exploit the same class of environment resources in a similar way

22
Q

methods of defining functional groups

A

Similarity in structure or function: growth form, feeding guild, traits
Response to disturbance: fire, grazing, gap loving/shade tolerant, successional role
Data-driven: use broader range of characteristics

23
Q

why use functional groups?

A

Species problem -too many to study or manage
Generalise findings - to different species or conditions
Management activities - monitoring change and predicting change, both require transferring results and simplicity, shift from species to ecosystem focus

24
Q

grazier functional group

A

Time horizon: 1-10 years
Concerns: condition suitable for grazing and profit
Cool/warm season growth
C3 and C4
Palatable/unpalatable
Grasses/forbs/woody
Annual/perennial
Grazing response
Noxious weeds

25
Q

functional group regional natural resources planner

A

5-20 years
Concerns: fire hazard, remnant vegetation, biodiversity, salinity, ecosystem services
Woody/non-woody
Fuel accumulation
Root depth
Invasive species
Rare or threatened species
Fire and grazing response
Habitat quality

26
Q

climate policy maker/modeller

A

50+ years
Concerns: climate change, biomass, land use, disturbances
Carbon metabolism (for CO2 increase)
Woody/non-woody
Evergreen/deciduous
Grazing response
Fire response
Nutrient cycling/uptake
Litter decomposition rate

27
Q

functional response types

A

Groups that respond in similar ways to the abiotic and biotic environment
Gap vs understory, fire tolerant vs intolerant, drought or frost resistant

28
Q

functional effect types

A

Groups that have similar effects on ecosystem processes such as productivity, nutrient cycling and trophic transfer
Nitrogen fixers, ecosystem engineers, fire promoting species

29
Q

are traits functional?

A

Global trait distributions are constrained
Plants face consistent trade-offs
This reflects traits having function

30
Q

how hard do we need to look when a species is absent?

A

Detectability:
The probability that you will detect an individual if it is present at a site per unit search effort
Critical to appropriate survey design
Specific to the species in question

Time to detection:
Observed experience
Weather
Time of day
Grass cover interaction
Search for a long time!