Week 3: Principles of the UK Constitution Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Provide three arguments for codifying the codification of the constitution.

A
  1. Provides a clearer and more accessible set of arrangements
  2. Easier to understand
  3. Opportunity for reform
  4. Prevents abuse of constitutional arrangements
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Provide three arguments for the constitution remaining uncodified.

A
  1. Reduces flexibility
  2. Introduced a number of questions (West Lothian Question)
  3. Would require a lengthly and costly process of consultation with the public
  4. Couldn’t be enacted like any other piece of legislation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are the three principles of the constitution?

A
  1. The Rule of Law (Legality)
  2. Separation of powers (Responsible government)
  3. Parliamentary Sovereignty (Democracy)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the two perspectives on the rule of law?

A
  1. Substantive
  2. Formal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is an issue with further definition of the Rule of Law

A

It would make it legally contestable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How long can the House of Lords delay a bill for.

A

A year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case highlights that a bill does not reqiure the assent of the House of Lords.

A

R v Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case highlighted that it is within the Court’s power to strike down secondary legislation?

A

R (Unison) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

  • The SoS proposed a fee for brining cases before the court
  • This fee was struck down due to it impeding access to justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are Bingham’s 8 Principles of the Rule of Law?

A
  1. The Law must be accessible, intelligible, clear and predictable as is possible
  2. Questions of legal right and liability should be resolved by the application of law and not discretion
  3. The law of the land should apply equally to all
  4. Public officials must not exceed the limits of their powers unreasonably
  5. The law must protect Human Rights
  6. The Law must be accessible
  7. adjudicative procedures should be fair
  8. Domestic law should adhere to international law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who said power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely

A

Lord Acton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What can be considered a constructive breech of the seperation of powers

A

A veto

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the downsides of a veto

A
  1. Undermines indpendence of the judiciary
  2. Abuse of power
  3. Undermines parliamentary soverignty
  4. Ineffective legislature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the upsides to a veto?

A
  1. Vetos can be reversed through a 2/3 majority or other contingency
  2. Allowing regulation of the legislature while respecting law making authority.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What can be considered a destructive breech of the separation of powers?

A

An executive order.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Barendt’s perspective on the seperation of powers?

A

An administration can span across all three branches as long as it is adequately held to account.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is Barber’s perspective of the seperation of powers?

A

The tripartite vision of the state is a distraction.

17
Q

Which case highlights the extent of Ministerial powers?

A

R v The Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Fire Brigades Union

18
Q

Which case highlights the importance of the soverignty of parliament and questions whether the court can judicially review an act of prerogative?

A

Miller II

19
Q

What are the three perspectives on the the extent of parliementary soverignty?

A
  1. The formative view - there can be no restrictions on parliaments sovereignty
  2. The new view - there can be some restrictions on parliaments sovereignty
  3. The converse view - parliament is already constricted and thus not sovereign
20
Q

What did the Parliament Act 1911 do?

A
  1. Reduced the maximum lifespan of Parliament from 7 years to 5 years.
  2. Removed the Lords ability to veto
  3. Allowed the Lords to delay a bill by 2 years.
21
Q

What did the Parliament Act 1949 do?

A

Further reduce the time allowed by the Lords to delay a bill to a single year.

22
Q

How long can the Lords delay a money bill?

A

One month.

23
Q

Can the Lords amend money bills?

A

No.