Week 3: Light Emitting Diode Flashcards
What is a double-heterostructure design and why would you use it?
A double-heteostructure design is when two different materials are used and you do so to try to confine the electrons and holes so that the probability of radiative recombination is higher which increases the efficiency of the devices.
Describe the three stages of the formation of p-n junction in which electrons and holes recombine and emit light.
In the first stage, two separate p and n type semiconductors exist with different fermi levels. When they’re brought together, the fermi levels do not form a straight line. The third stage is at thermal equilibrium.
What happens to the pn-junction under thermal equilibrium and how does that enable us to produce current?
Under thermal equilibrium, the energy bands bend to allow the fermi levels of the p-type and n-type materials form a straight line.
The first current producing mechanism is fusion, the motion of carriers in response to a concentration gradient generated by the bending and fusion of the materials.
The second is drift, motion of carriers in response to an applied electric field. The band bending generates an electric field that produces a force on the carriers. In the vicinity of the junction, all the free holes go over to the electron side and all the electrons go over to the hole side, creating a separation of charge.
How do you calculate the built in potential for the pn-junction?
V_bi = (k_bT/q) * ln((n_n0p_p0)/n_i^2)
What is the equation for current density in a pn junction?
The current density, J, is defined:
J = J_p + J_n = J_sexp(qV/k_bT)
where J_s is the saturation current.
J_s = (qD_pp_n0/L_p) + (qD_nn_p0/L_n)
What happens to the potential of the junction with reverse bias? How does minority carrier concentration compare to thermal equilibrium concentration with reverse bias?
With reverse bias you increase the potential for the junction. You’ve increased the electric field which imbalances the drift and diffusion currents at thermal equilibrium. So under reverse bias, you make the electric field stronger until you get current from drift.
The minority carrier concentrations dip below the thermal equilibrium concentrations.
What happens to the potential of the junction with forward bias? How does minority carrier concentration compare to thermal equilibrium concentration with forward bias?
With forward bias, the built in potential is reduced and when it’s reduced, it reduces the barrier for the electrons in the holes to diffuse. This means you get exponentially increasing current from diffusion.
With forward bias the minority carrier concentrations exceed their thermal equilibrium concentrations in the vicinity of the junction since most of the current is dominated by diffusion from the concentration gradient.
Under what condition will a diode emit light?
We can use the case of the ideal diode where minority carriers are recombining with majority carriers. There’s an exponentially decaying carrier concentration and if the recombination is dominantly radiative, then the diode will emit light.
What is the internal quantum efficiency and how do you calculate it?
The internal quantum efficiency is the percentage of the recombining carriers that will emit light. It can be calculated:
Internal quantum efficiency = # of photons emitted/s / # of carriers injected/s
The internal quantum efficiency is also equal to the radiative efficiency of the device so you can calculate this by:
1 / (1 + tau_R/tau_NR)
What three mechanisms prevent light from escaping an LED?
Reabsorption by semiconductor, particularly by the substrate material.
Reflection at the semiconductor surface
Total internal reflection
What causes an LED with a Gallium Arsenide substrate to lose 85% of the light it generates?
Gallium Arsenide substrate ends up absorbing 85 percent of the light generated. Reabsorption is the problem here.
How would you reduce the losses from reabsorption by the substrate material? Which Gallium based substrate loses ~25% of the light?
You would have to switch to a material for the substrate with a larger band gap. Gallium Phosphide has a higher band gap than Gallium Arsenide and loses about 25% of the light.
What is Fresnel loss?
Fresnel loss is light loss that occurs at the air to semiconductor interface because not all of the light can get out.
What is the expression for the power reflected at normal incidence (also called the reflection coefficient sometimes)?
This expression is:
R = ((n_2 - n_1) / (n_2 + n_1))^2
where n_2 is the index of refraction of air and n_1 is the index of refraction of the semiconductor.
What assumption can we make for the reflection coefficient when the semiconductor has a large index of refraction? Give an example.
When the semiconductor material has a large index of refraction, the average reflection coefficient from summing over all angles of incidence is approximately equal to the reflection coefficient at normal incidence (perpendicular). Gallium Phosphide has a high index of refraction, n = 3.3.
What must you do when calculating reflection coefficients for materials with smaller index of refraction?
You have to use the average R, the average coefficient of reflection taken from summing over all angles of incidence. You cannot use the assumption that the coefficient of reflection for normal incidence is sufficient.
What is the critical angle and what does it mean for total internal reflection? What is the critical angle for Gallium Arsenide? Gallium Phosphide?
Total internal reflection can be thought of as light that gets trapped within the semiconductor and cannot cross the air interface.
The critical angle is determined from Snell’s law and it indicates the angle at which all angles above it will have total internal reflection. The critical angle defines a cone in which generated light may be coupled out to reach the viewers.
theta_1 = theta_c = sin^-1(n_2/n_1)
This occurs when theta_2 = 90 degrees.
Gallium Arsenide critical angle = 16 degrees. Gallium phosphide is 17 degrees.