Week 3 Flashcards
What is a tautology?
A compound proposition which is true under all possible assignments of truth values to its prime propositions. Also called a valid proposition. Contain only T in the last column of their truth tables.
What is a contradiction?
A compound proposition which is false under all possible assignments of truth values to its prime propositions. Also called an inconsistent proposition. Contain only F in the last column of their truth tables.
What is a contingent proposition?
A compound proposition which is neither a tautology nor a contradiction. Has T and F in the last column of their truth tables.
What is the difference between gates and propositional connectives?
Gates distinguish between input signals and the output signal, whereas formulae in propositional logic have no such notion. Inputs are known and the output is an unknown dependent.
What is logical equivalence?
If and only if their equivalence is a tautology. Always true.
What is logical implication?
A formula p is said to logically imply a formula q if and only if their implication is a tautology.
What are the commutative laws?
p and q is logically equivalent to q and p
p or q is logically equivalent to q or p
What are the associative laws?
p and (q and r) is logically equivalent to (p and q) and r
p or (q or r) is logically equivalent to (p or q) or r
What are the distributive laws?
p or (q and r) is logically equivalent to (p or q) and (p or r)
p and (q or r) is logically equivalent to (p and q) or (p and r)
What are De Morgan’s Laws?
¬(p ^ q) is logically equivalent to ¬p v ¬q
¬(p v q) is logically equivalent to ¬p ^ ¬q
What is the law of negation? (involution law)
Two negations cancel each other out.
¬(¬p) = p
What is the law of excluded middle and the law of contradiction known as collectively?
Complement laws.
What is the law of implication?
What is the contrapositive law?
What is the law of equivalence?
p implies q is logically equivalent to ¬p v q;
p implies q is logically equivalent to ¬q implies ¬p;
(p equivalent to q) is logically equivalent to (p implies q) ^ (q implies p)
What are the laws of idempotence?
p v p is logically equivalent to p
p ^ p is logically equivalent to p
What are the laws of simplification?
p ^ true is logically equivalent to p
p v true is logically equivalent to true
p ^ false is logically equivalent to false
p v false is logically equivalent to p
p v (p ^ q) is logically equivalent to p
p ^ (p v q) is logically equivalent to p