Week 3 Flashcards
EMDR
eye movement desensitization and reprocessing
used to treat posttraumatic stress disorder
recalls trauma memories while making horizontal eye movements
emdr vs cbt
same efficacy (effectiveness)
how to test emdr on healthy patients
- healthy patients recall unpleasant memories for a few seconds. They rate these memories in terms of vividness and emotionality.
- They then recall those memories for a second, longer time. During this second recall, there is either no dual task or the participant makes eye movements while recalling the memories.
- After a break, lasting from between minutes to a few days, memory is recalled under same conditions as first time and is rated again in terms of vividness and emotionality
3 hypothesis that were tested for EMDR
- emdr works by recalling aversive memories and eye movements do not contribute anything
- emdr works by stimulating interhemispheric communication
- emdr works by taxing working memory during recall
hypothesis 1. emdr works by recalling aversive memories and eye movements do not contribute anything
true or false
significant difference with use of eye movements to vividness and emotionality of memory before and after
hypothesis 1 is false based on meta analysis, very robust
why could emdr work by stimulating interhemispheric communication
eye movements could increase communication between left and right brain hemispheres, thereby enhancing the ability to remember an aversive event while not being negatively aroused and that it does not matter which sensory channels are used to stimulate “interhemispheric communication” as long as the stimulus is alternating and rhythmically left-right: beeps that are presented left and then right, left and right tactile stimulation, left and right taps on the table, etc.
hypothesis 2. emdr works by stimulating interhemispheric communication
true or false based on evidence
moving eyes vertically decreases vividness and emotionality just as much, but interhemispheric communication is stimulated more by horizontal eye movement than by vertical eye movement
why could emdr work by taxing working memory during recall
we are doing 2 tasks and they must compete for the working memory, there is limited capacity. Recalling emotional memory and making eye movements both require WM capacity. This means it doesn’t matter if it is horizontal or vertical eye movement.
imagination inflation effect
when a person tries to form a vivid and detailed image during recall, this influences the original memory, which becomes more vivid and realistic.
recall + eye movement combination will lead to imagination deflation.
consequences of WM theory
means that any task should reduce emotionality of memory, this has been found.
Also positive memories should be less positive after doing a task, this has also been found.
uses of emdr
not only trauma, but for other disorders, ones that were intensified by an unpleasant event. Disorders such as anxiety disorders, eating disorders, hypochondriasis, depression, etc.
reaction time task
a way to determine how much cognitive capacity a mental task requires. task A is administered, and RT is measured. Task B is added to task A and difference in RT is how much WM is taxed.
who benefits more from eye movements procedures
people with low working memory capacity should benefit more from making eye movements.
inverted U and the WM theory
distracting task must be not too hard or not too easy
there is an invert U with memory emotionality and task difficulty
research confirms this
different versions of trauma focused cognitive behavior therapy
prolonged exposure therapy
cognitive processing therapy
cognitive therapy for ptsd
emdr
similarities of trauma therapy
access trauma memory and change meaning of trauma
who developed emdr
Francine shapiro
Shapiro theory of emdr
catalyzes a rebalancing in the NeuroSystems, by shifting information that is locked up in the central nervous system to the two hemispheres
fear extinction is absent in…
ptsd patients
fear extinction learning improved in ptsd patients after…
emdr therapy compared to control group