WEEK 25 part 2 Flashcards

1
Q

List 4 moral principles applied to deal with moral dilemmas

A
  1. Respect for Autonomy
  2. Non-Maleficence
  3. Beneficence
  4. Justice
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Principles are common in all kind of theories. Based on their common morality: list 4

A
  1. Pluralistic
  2. Universal accepted
  3. Common sense moral judgment
  4. ordinary shared moral beliefs.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Describe the balancing/weighing of principles

A

o “The process of finding reasons to support beliefs about which
moral norms should prevail.”
o Compare the relative weights and strengths of the principles
o Based on good reasons, not intuition
o Useful for reaching judgments for particular cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Respect for autonomy define

A

Patients’ “rights to hold views, to make choices and to take
actions based on their values and beliefs.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Obligations arising out of this principle of respect for autonomy.
list them

A
  1. Informed consent
  2. Confidentiality
  3. Truth telling
  4. Effective communication
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

one word.
Both an ethical and legal requirement

A

informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

list and explain elements of informed consent

A

PRECONDITIONS
o Competence (to understand and decide)
o Voluntariness (in deciding)
INFORMATION ELEMENTS
o Disclosure (of material information)
o Recommendation (of a plan)
o Understanding (of 3 & 4)
CONSENT ELEMENTS
o Decision (for/against a plan)
o Authorisation (of the chosen plan)
o Time-consuming process
o Capacity/competence assessment may be required
o Competent patient can:
communicate a choice
understand information provided
appreciate the consequences
reason about the options

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Explain confidentiality

A

Maintaining a patient’s confidentiality is a cornerstone of the doctor-patient relationship

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

List factors where confidentiality can be breached.

A

National Health Act no 61 of 2003 - can be breached:
- Patient’s written consent
- Court order or any law requires
- Non-disclosure represents serious threat to public health

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Explain TRUTH TELLING

A

HPCSA General Ethical Guidelines: Truthfulness a core value for good practice & the basis of trust
o Must not conceal the truth from a patient (unless they explicitly do not wish to be told the diagnosis)
o Disclosure of medical error & importance of good documentation of clinical notes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Explain effective communication

A

Patient centered care and good communication skills ethical requirement for maintaining the doctor-patient relationship
o Complexities of South African multilingual & multicultural context
o Role of interpreters & ethical challenges with confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is meant by non-maleficence

A

Requires that we “first do no harm”
Prima facie (not absolute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Rules arising from non-maleficence

A

Do not kill
Do not cause pain or suffering
Do not incapacitate (prevent from functioning in the normal way)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Non-maleficence does not require us to act beneficently.
True or False

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Traditionally ______ unacceptable in medicine

A

Killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

one word.
Casual action that results in death(intentional and wrong)

A

Traditionally killing

17
Q

what is meant by Rule of double effect

A

intention vs foreseeable unintended negative consequences

18
Q

What is meant by letting die

A

Avoiding intervention so that death occurs due to underlying disease/ organ failure/ injury (less wrong/acceptable)

19
Q

Accidental killing or self-defense
are examples of?

A

Problematic! Vague and morally confusing

20
Q

Non-maleficence also requires us to minimize ____ of harm

A

Risk

21
Q

Patients must be informed of material risk. Give the Material risk.

A

-reasonable person would attach significance if warned of it
-Doctor should have reasonably aware that patient would attach significance to if warned of risk.

22
Q

Risk may occur without harmful intent - casual agents may still be _____ or ______ responsible

A

Legally or morally

23
Q

What is meant by standard of Due Care

A

Taking appropriate care to avoid causing harm, as a reasonable and prudent person would.

24
Q

Negligence is the absence of?

A

Due Care

25
Q

Negligence can be intentional and inadvertent. To show that you understand this terms. Explain them using examples.

A
  1. Intentional- eg failing to change a dressing as scheduled
  2. Inadvertent- eg forgetting that patient doesn’t want to know gender of a baby.
26
Q

Negligence shown if:

A

1, Professional has duty of care to affected party
2. Duty breached
3. Harm experienced by affected party
4. Harm caused by the breach of duty

27
Q

what sis meant about Malpractice

A

if the negligence fail to follow professional standards of care

28
Q

What is meant by beneficence

A

Requires that we protect and defend the rights of patients, help patients, (act in their best interests).

29
Q

Beneficence prevent or reduces harm.
True or false

A

True

30
Q

List the implications of beneficence

A
  1. Clinical competence
  2. Balancing risks, benefits and costs
  3. Paternalism
31
Q

Describe paternalism

A

Intentional overriding of person’s known preferences , in order to benefits or avoid harm to the person.

32
Q

Describe active paternalism.

A

Doctor overrides patient’s right to decline intervention.
-Hard: despite informed, voluntary and autonomous decision e.g refusal to respect advance directive.
-Soft: nom-autonomous decisions/ non-voluntary conduct e.g severe depression preventing rational decision-making.

33
Q

What is Passive Paternalism

A

Doctor refuses an intervention in the patient’s best interests. Easier to justify than active paternalism – doctor not obliged if patient’s request goes against acceptable standard treatment. Medical futility – if an intervention truly will not produce clinical benefit – cancels obligation to perform procedure. “Clinically non-beneficial interventions” preferred term.

34
Q

Fair treatment

A

Justice

35
Q

List obligations in 3 areas:

A
  1. Respect morally acceptable laws – Legal justice
  2. Respect patients’ rights – Rights-based justice
  3. Ensure fair distribution of limited resources –
    Distributive justice.
36
Q

Legal and Rights-based justice: working knowledge of
relevant laws. List those act

A

o National Health Act No. 61 of 2003
o The Children’s Act No. 38 of 2005
o Mental Health Act No. 17 of 2002
o Bill of Rights, South African Constitution
o Patients’ Rights Charter

37
Q

What is meant by distributive justice

A

“Fair, equitable and appropriate distribution of benefits and burdens
determined by norms that structure the terms of social co-operation.”

38
Q

list theories of justice

A

o Utilitarian (maximise utility)
o Libertarian (individual rights)
o Communitarian (communal good)
o Egalitarian (fair equal opportunity)
o Capabilities theories (quality of life depends on what able to achieve – 10 core
capabilities)
o Wellbeing theories (justice requires sufficient well-being in health, personal
security, reasoning, respect, attachment and determination)