Week 2: Writing a Review Flashcards

1
Q

What are the purposes of a lit review?

A
  • throughly describe research published on an area
  • critically evaluate it
  • look at other hypotheses and viewpoints
  • to highlight areas worthy of future investigation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the purposes of an honours lit review?

A
  • to inform the reader of background of which your projects based
  • help them understand there’s a Q that needs to be answered
  • educate student about their topic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Relationship between lit review and thesis

A
  • lit review is standalone
  • is not thesis intro
  • should engage the reader so they look forward
  • reader should be able to make an educated guess about what’s to come
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A literature review is not

A
  • a series of who did what
  • narrative/book review
  • everything written on a topic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What sources should be used in an honours lit review?

A
  • published, peer reviewed
  • empirical papers
  • meta analyses
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

First step of scanning an article

A
  • research q
  • hypotheses
  • key findings
  • finding interpretation
  • main conclusions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Second step of scanning an article

A
  • identify methods and theories
  • holes in the method
  • results valid?
  • limitations?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe the structure of a lit review

A

/Users/nikkirotondo/Desktop/Screen Shot 2018-05-27 at 10.53.56 am.png

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Scope

A

Tell the reader what you will and wont be reviewing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Scaffold

A

Build ideas incrementally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Signposts

A

Tell the reader what is coming up

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Summarise

A

Provide interim summaries at the end of sections

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What should one do in the body of the review?

A
  • tell the story
  • build rationale
  • group lit by theme
  • summarise and evaluate
  • show gaps, compare and contrast
  • methodological issues, limitations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Conclusion

A
  • summarise main take home points

- should provide justification for your study by highlighting the area it will investigate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

List common weaknesses in papers

A
  • self report
  • observational designs
  • uni students as participants
  • correlational only
  • small sample size
  • over emphasis on one significant finding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Why is self report a weakness?

A

Limits conclusion objectivity

17
Q

Why are observational designs a weakness?

A

Limits causal inference

18
Q

Why is using uni students as participants a weakness?

A

Limits generalisability

19
Q

List some strengths in papers

A
  • synthesis, drawing connections and making new ideas
  • critical literature appraisal
  • objective and unemotive
  • illustrative