Week 2 (personality theory) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was Adlers approach to personality theory?

A
  • Adler argued that social context shapes our personality
  • They say “Events in the lives of individuals as having no meaning except as participating in a collective whole”
  • We evaluate our traits based on social context and social comparison
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was Jungs approach to personality theory?

A
  • Jung argued that our experience shapes our personality, especially early life experiences
  • Jung believed there was at least two different personality types: introverts and extraverts
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

According to Jung, what is the difference between introversion and extraversion?

A

INTROVERSION
- the contents of consciousness refer more to the self

EXTRAVERSION
- the contents of consciousness refers mainly to external objects in the world

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How did Jung develop his ideas?

A

From psychoanalytic theory and clinical observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What personality type indicator is based on jungs ideas?

A

The myers briggs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What did the creators of the myers briggs personality test say in reference to the use of the test in occupational settings?

A

“It is unethical, and in many cases illegal, to require job applicants to take the Indicator if the results
will be used to screen out applicants.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Freuds approach to personality theory?

A
  • Freud argues that genes interact with our environment to shape our personality
  • He argues that instinctual drives interact with childhood developmental experience
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was Eysenck’s approach to personality theory?

A
  • Eysenck argued that physiology shapes our personality
  • His idea of introversion and extraversion was in terms of physiological arousal
  • An extravert draws their arousal from external sources. A lively and busy environment is a source of stimulation and excitement for an extravert. An under stimulating environment leads to boredom and lethargy.
  • An introvert has higher levels of internal arousal, so prefers a less stimulating environment to avoid depletion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe Eysencks vison of stimulation vs. arousal in introverts and extraverts

A
  • For the same levels of stimulation, an introvert is usually more aroused than an extravert
  • as stimulation increases, arousal increases at a greater rate for introverts compared to extraverts
  • After a point, arousal starts to decrease for the introvert
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How did Geen set out to test eysencks hypothesis?

A
  • They grouped ppts into introvert and extravert
  • Each group was asked to listen to music whilst computing a paired associate listening task
  • ppts were either:
    allowed to choose their music volume
    allocated a low intensity music volume
    allocated a high intensity music volume
  • He then measured ppts pulse rates as an indication of arousal
  • He also measured participants performance on the task
  • He found that in both conditions of intensity, pulse rate was higher for introverts than extraverts
  • The high noise intensity choice would lead to a higher pulse rate than the low noise intendity choice
  • When ppts were able to choose their own intensity, the introverts chose a lower intensity and the extraverts a higher intensity, but with each giving the same level of arousal to each group of a pulse around 75bpm
  • In the high intensity condition, extraverts performed better than introverts. In the low intensity condition, introverts performed better.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are 4 personality theory hypotheses and who argued them?

A
  1. Social context shapes personality- Adler
  2. Our experiences shape personality - Jung
  3. Genes interact with our environment to shape our personality - Freud
  4. Physiology shapes our personality - Eysenck
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is Eysenck’s model of the ascending reticular activating system?

A

RETICULO-CORTICAL SYSTEM
manages arousal generated by incoming stimuli
- High arousal = introvert
- Low arousal = extravert

RETICULO-LIMBIC SYSTEM
manages and controls arousal to emotional stimuli
- High arousal = neurotic
- Low arousal = emotionally stable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Susan Cain, cofounder of the quiet revolution argue?

A

We should all be mindful of our own tendency towards introversion and extraversion and allow ourselves to create environments that work for us.

Although we live in an extravert focussed society, there are many benefits to introversion. For example introverted leaders often deliver better outcomes because they support others to flourish.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is Jeffrey Grays model of personality?

A
  • Some of us approach risks and are motivated by rewards
  • Others avoid risks and are less sensitive to rewards
  • Personality is based on the interaction between a behavioural approach system and a behavioural inhibition system. These systems can map onto the neuro-endocrine system.

BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH SYSTEM
- The BAS is reward seeking. It is based on a model of appetite motivation, meaning an individuals disposition to pursue and achieve goals
- The BAS is aroused when it recieves cues corresponding to rewards
- Individuals with a highly active BAS are more impulsive
- They also show higher levels of positive emotions such as elation, happiness and hope in response to environmental cues.
The BAS includes the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), ventral striatum, ventral pallidum and Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA)

FIGHT FLIGHT FEAR SYSTEM

  • activated when threat is detected
  • Responsible for mediating reactions to all aversive sti-
  • It drives defensive avoidance and it is responsible for avoidance and escape behaviours
  • Individuals with a highly active FFFS are highly tense moody and nervous

BEHAVIOURAL INHIBITION SYSTEM

  • Responsible for resolving conflicts between the FFFS and the BAS
  • Balances out the drive to approach reward and avoid threats
  • Activation of the BIS leads to attention and arousal, which might otherwise be termed anxiety
  • Attention is drawn towards potential threats
  • it initiates risk assesment to resolve goal conflict. This state is experienced as worry/rumination and a sense of possible danger.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe the behavioural approach system

A

BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH SYSTEM
- The BAS is reward seeking. It is based on a model of appetite motivation, meaning an individuals disposition to pursue and achieve goals
- The BAS is aroused when it recieves cues corresponding to rewards
- Individuals with a highly active BAS are more impulsive
- They also show higher levels of positive emotions such as elation, happiness and hope in response to environmental cues.
The BAS includes the Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), ventral striatum, ventral pallidum and Ventral Tegmental Area (VTA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the fight flight fear system

A

FIGHT FLIGHT FEAR SYSTEM
- activated when threat is detected
- Responsible for mediating reactions to all aversive sti-
- It drives defensive avoidance and it is responsible for avoidance and escape behaviours
- Individuals with a highly active FFFS are highly tense moody and nervous
-The FFFS includes the ventral prefrontal cortex (PFC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala,
medial hypothalamus and periaqueductal grey (PAG).

17
Q

Describe the behavioural inhibition system

A

BEHAVIOURAL INHIBITION SYSTEM
- Responsible for resolving conflicts between the FFFS and the BAS
- Balances out the drive to approach reward and avoid threats
- Activation of the BIS leads to attention and arousal, which might otherwise be termed anxiety
- Attention is drawn towards potential threats
-it initiates risk assesment to resolve goal conflict. This state is experienced as worry/rumination and a sense of possible danger.
- The BIS includes the Dorsal Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), the
amgydala, the medial hypothalamus and the Periaqueductal grey (PAG)

18
Q

What areas of the brain are each of the three systems associated with? (BAS, FFFS, BIS)

A

BAS- Prefrontal cortex, ventral striatum, ventral pallidum, ventral tegmental area

FFFS- ventral prefrontal cortex (PFC), the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala,
medial hypothalamus and periaqueductal grey (PAG)

BIS- Dorsal Prefrontal Cortex (PFC), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), the
amgydala, the medial hypothalamus and the Periaqueductal grey (PAG)

19
Q

what is the hypothesised relationship between the FFFS/BIS and BAS systems and the personality traits of neuroticism and extraversion?

A

The FFFS&BIS is associated with neuroticism and introversion

The BAS is associated with extraversion and stability

20
Q

What is the lexical hypothesis

A
  • The frequency of use of personality related words is pressumed to correspond to importance
  • The words we use most to describe personality will be labelleing the aspects of personality we think are most important
21
Q

Who invented the correlational method and what was its context in personality research?

A
  • Francis Galton invented the correlational method
  • This method is used to explore the relationship between different characteristics in personality research
  • Galtons work is the first documented source of a dictionary being used to elicit words describing personality
22
Q

What was Allports work on personality theory?

A
  • Allport used the lexical approach to identify 18000 words that described 4500 personality traits
23
Q

Who used factor analysis to investigate personality and how did they do it?

A
  • Catell used factor analysis
  • This is a data reduction technique that allows us to simplify the correlational relationship between a number of variables
  • His aim was to reduce long lists of personality traits into a far smaller number of traits
  • He used factor analysis to identify which attributes cluster together
24
Q

How did personality theorists reduce allports 4500 personality traits to 16 factor analysis surface traits

A
  • Allports 4500 traits
    -Raters then removed all synonyms to 171 traits
  • Rating individuals on traits then led to conclusion that 46 surface traits were sufficient to describe
    individual differences in personality.
  • factor analysis then reduced this to 16 factors
25
Q

How did Costa and Mcrae develop the big five model of personality?

A
  • The development was strictly empirical with no theoretical basis
  • They took multiple measures of personality and ran a ‘super’ factor analysis looking at how personality traits cluster
  • Large samples of participants completed at least two personality questionnaires
  • The resultant data was factor analysed to reveal clusters of traits
  • They consistently found five non-overlapping factors: extraversion, openness, aggreableness, contientiousness and neuroticism
26
Q

What are the 6 basic criteria for evaluating theories of personality?

A
  • description and explanation
  • empirical validity
  • testable concepts
  • comprehensive
  • parsimony
  • value
27
Q

what is the description criteria when evaluating personality?

A
  • a theory should bring order into the complexity of behaviours that have been observed and measured
  • it should help simplify, identify and clarify important issues
28
Q

What is the explanation criteria when evaluatig personality?

A
  • a theory should help in understanding the why of behaviour

- Does the theory explain how and why individual differences occur

29
Q

what is the value criteria when evaluating personality?

A

-Does it stimulate interest in a research area/lead to beneficial changes?

30
Q

What is the testable concepts criteria when evaluating personality?

A
  • Can the concepts in the theory be operationalised so that they can be tested?
31
Q

What is reliability and what is three aspects of it?

A
  • The degree to which an assesment tool can produce stable and consistent results
  • Test retest reliability- does the test yield similar results at different times?
  • Parralel forms- do equivalent test forms yield the same answer
  • Split Half reliability - Cronbachs alpha- Test all possible halfs and calculate the average between halfs. This can measure the internal consistency of the scores of a test.
32
Q

Describe comprehensiveness when evaluating theories of personality

A
  • A good theory should be able to encompass and explain a wide variety of normal and abnormal behaviour
33
Q

How many dimensions of personality do each of the personality theories have?

A

JUNGS MBTI- 16 types
EYNSENCK - three domains (extroversion, neuroticism, psychotism)
GRAY- two dimensions (reward sensitivity and punishment sensitivity)
COSTA AND MCRAY - Five factors with a wider selection of facets behind these factors

34
Q

Decribe parsimony when evaluating personality theory

A
  • The theory should be economical in terms of the number of explanatory concepts it includes
  • All concepts included should be nessercary to explain the phenomena
  • The law of parsimony advocates choosing the simplest scientific theory that fits the evidence
35
Q

Describe empirical validity when evaluating personality theory, and outline 3 types of validity

A
  • A good theory will generate predictions that can be tested in an empirically valid way
  • For a measure to be valid it must be free from systematic error and measure what it intends to measure
  • FACE VALIDITY- does the test look like it measures what it claims to measure?
  • CONSTRUCT VALIDITY- the extend to which a test captures a specific theoretical construct or trait
  • PREDICTIE VALIDITY?- does the test accurately predict a criteria that will occur in the future
36
Q

What is one disadvantage of face validity?

A
  • it can leave a test vulnerable to social desirability bias
37
Q

What are the three causal links between neuroticism and mental health disorders?

A

HYPOTHESIS 1- overlapping genetic influences
- Neuroticism and mental health disorders are caused partly by the same genes
-Twin studies indicate that one third to two thirds of the genetic variance in a broad range of
mental disorders is shared with neuroticism
-rather than causing mental healtlh problems it is a marker for risk for mental health problems

HYPOTHESIS 2- neuroticism, stressful events and social support

  • people high in neuroticism live their lives in ways that increase their likelyhood of stressful events
  • e.g unstable relationships, loss of employmenr
  • there is also evidence that neuroticism predicts lower levels of social support

HYPOTHESIS 3- neuroticism and emotional reactivity to stressful life events

  • people high in neuroticism react more intensely to stressful life events
  • may use fewer problem focussed and more emotion foccused strategies to cope with stress
  • more likely to use insufficient escape avoidant strategies to cope