Week 2: Foundations in OS Flashcards
Why does Clark (1991) believe that occupational science is important to the profession of OT?
A. Because there is a similar focus on occupations for the individual, the discipline of OS can focus on the research aspects of occupation to improve and reconstruct traditional OT practices
B. OT was mostly based off of empirical data, with little science to back up their practices; OS offers the science to close this gap
C. During this time, there were limited doctoral level programs offered in OS/OT, so the creation of a discipline focussed on the basic scientific inquiry would benefit the profession
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
Article which introduces, defines, and defends OS as a unique discipline based in scientific research with a number of benefits
Clark et al (1991): Occupational Science: Academic Innovation of in the service of OT’s future. OS is described, defined, and distinguished from other social sciences. Distinguishes OS from other social sciences.
Clark et al (1991) defines OS as the scientific discipline that provides explanations of the human as an __________________
Clark et al (1991) defines OS as the scientific discipline that provides explanations of the human as an occupational being
According to Clark et al (1991) occupation is a uniquely human enterprise because…
Occupation is a uniquely human enterprise because of the extent of its symbolic vehicle.
What does Clark (1991) state we must do so that the practice of OT can be nurtured?
She states that unlike mainstream social science, OTs look at what is at the heart of human activity. So, we are left with an abundance of Q’s about occupation that must be answered so the practice of OT can be nurtured. We must begin to construct theories that elucidate the reasons why persons choose one activity over another. Once the place and potency of occupation in our daily lives is understood through systematic study, the practice of OT may be enhanced.
Clark (1991) states that USC defines occupation as:
A. Study of humans as occupational beings
B. Chunks of culturally and personally meaningful activities in which humans engage that can be named in the lexicon of our culture
C. Activities in which one engages in simply for pleasure
B. Chunks of culturally and personally meaningful activities.
- Occupations can be construed at an abstract level, as in working, resting, or engaging in leisure activities, or more concretely, as in reading a book, playing tennis, or painting a house
- We configure activities within time that can be chunked and correspondingly labeled. e.g., eat, groom, job. Everyday, person creates his/her daily experiences through planning, orchestrating, and participating in occupation
How does clark (1991) distinguish occupations for humans vs. animals?
-Activities for animals are in the present and are limited in symbolic content and meaning
The USC general systems Model of the human subsystems that influence occupation is presented as an organizing \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ (Clark et al, 1991) A. Algorithm B. Analytic C. Heuristic D. Cognitive bias
C. Heuristic. (solving problems by looking at people’s experience)
- Coherent conceptual framework for the organization of knowledge generated in OS and illustrates the human subsystems to provide comprehensive explanation of occupation
- 6 levels (subsystems) are presented, which are critical for understanding occupation
According to the USC general systems model of human subsystems that influence occupation (Clark et al, 1901), occupation can be explained through the focus on which single subsystem of the human system:
A. The physical subsystem (e.g., skilled use of hands)
B. Biological subsystem (e.g., SI, for purpose and exploratory behaviors)
C. Information processing subsystem (e.g., cognitive operations, learning, memory, planning as they shape engagement in occupation)
D. Sociocultural subsystem (social contexts, cultural standards)
E. Symbolic evaluative subsystem (e.g., language, logic, morals, science, arts)
F. Transcendental subsystem (sense of satisfaction, purpose, QOL)
G. Occupation can’t be explained through focus on a single level of the human subsystem
G. Occupation can’t be explained through focus on a single level of the human subsystem.
Through organization the USC general systems model of human subsystems that influence occupation (1991), which was found?
A. Occupation must be studied within the context of both the immediate environment and person’s history
B. Occupation cannot be explained through the focus on a single level of the human system
C. Occupation is fired by the human system’s drive for efficacy and competency
D. Although it may be observed as a behavior, occupation cannot be fully understood without consideration of its significance to the individual
E. Most productive study of occupation requires a synthesis of knowledge form the biological and social sciences
F. All of the above
F. All of the above
According to Clark et al (1991), how does OS relate to other disciplines?
- OS is distinct in that it attempts to theoretically address the entire range of phenomena surrounding human occupation
- Addresses research that is explicitly organized around the concept of occupation
- Traditional disciplines occasionally address issues related to particular occupations, but efforts are typically circumscribed within their discipline
- So strong justification for development of OS as scholarly enterprise
How does Clark et al (1991) describe the relationship between OT and OS?
- OS serves to preserve and enhance the discipline of OT
- OT provides a foundation of empirical evidence in which OS can expand upon
- Primary focus on OS is not immediate application to therapeutic intervention, but transmittal of most general principles and concepts of occupation
- OS is to OT what A and P are to medicine
How does Clark et al (1991) explain we can use OS to promote social welfare?
- OS holds the potential to provide important knowledge of relevance to the social and health problems which society is currently beset
- Can document activities of homeless people, so we can learn how to best tx them
- Assist patients with AIDS via engagement in self chosen and satisfying occupations
- Knowledge in OS may help elderly enjoy better QOL
In response to Clark et al’s (1992) article which highlights the symbiotic relationship between OT and OS, Mosey (1997) :
A. Agrees with Clark’s view that OT provides a foundation of empirical evidence in which OS can expand upon, while the research garnered by OS serves to preserve and enhance the discipline of OT
B. Disagrees with Clark (1991) and supports the full partition of OT and OS
C. Feels that OT and OS belong beside each other
D. Posits that OS and OT should be fully combined into one practice
B. Mosey (1991) supports the full partition of OT and OS.
-By focusing on the unique roles held by basic research and applied research in OS and OT respectively, Mosey suggested that in order to see continuous progress within both the discipline of OS and the profession of OT, the two must be mutually exclusive.
Mosey (1992) states that in order to seek legitimacy, OS must:
A. OS must turn away from OT and toward other disciplines
B. OS must turn away from OT and work solely on their own profession
C. OS must combine with OT
D. All of the above
A. OS must turn away from OT and toward other disciplines.
-States that a discipline’s source of legitimacy rests with the recognition and acceptance of other disciplines.
Which of the following is NOT an advantage which Mosey (1992) listed for the partition of OT and OS:
A. Partition allows for clear distinction between the focus of scientific inquiry appropriate to OS and that appropriate to OT
B. Clearer distinction between the form of scientific inquiry expected of OS and that expected of OT
C. Both the discipline and profession can now concentrate on their own work
D. Both disciplines no longer will have to share funds used towards research
D.
Why does Mosey (1992) warn against incomplete partition of OT and OS?
A. An unhealthy dependence could develop in which OS relies on OT for recognition or monetary value or OT relies on OS to do the profession’s scientific work
B. There would be confusion as to whether OS/OT is a discipline, a profession, or a hybrid
C. Possibility of indifferent, poorly focussed scientific inquiry due to lack of distinction between basic and applied scientific inquiry
D. All of the above
D. All of the above
Mosey (1992) states that a complete partition of OS and OT will occur only when…
Their resources are separated
Mosey (1992) states that postprofessional education in OT at master’s and doctoral level should do what?
A. Focus more on the application of OT rather than OS
B. Guide students in gaining knowledge and skills that are fundamental to applied scientific inquiry
C. Focus more on the scientific background of OS than application of OT
D. Require a master’s/doctorate in both OS and OT
B. Guide students in gaining knowledge and skills that are fundamental to applied scientific inquiry
In response to Mosey (1992’s) argument which supports the complete partition of OT and OS, what reasons did Clark (1993) give to support her belief that OT and OS should not be partitioned?
In Clark et al (1993’s) “Dangers Inherent in the Partition of OT and OS, “ Clark stated that:
- OS is used to strengthen the theoretical foundation that drives the profession of OT
- Through research OS seeks to examine the nature of phenomenon of occupation, which is known to tbe the very bases of OT
- A full partition of OS and OT would be detrimental to both, as they believe that the scientific inquiry that exists within each should not be isolated from one another.
In response to Mosey (1992’s) argument which supports the complete partition of OT and OS, Clark et al (1993) says that Mosey’s argument regarding basic and applied science is flawed because…
The distinction between basic and applied research is not always clear cut and airtight. It is more of a continuum and not an absolute dichotomy. The feedback process between basic (OS) and OT (applied) is valuable to both professions. Does not need to be separated.
T/F: In “Partition of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy: Sorting Out Some Issues,” Mosey (1993) responded to Clark’s (1993) idea regarding the basic-applied science continuum by supporting it
While Clark et al. (1993) supported a continuum between basic and applied research, Mosey stated that no scientific inquiry should attempt to utilize both simultaneously.
Clark et al (1991) states that we need to understand the place and potency of occupation in our daily lives through\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ study: A. Regional B. Interpretive C. Systemic D. Systematic
D. Systematic. Once the place and potency of occupation in our daily lives is understood through systematic study, the practice of occupational therapy may be enhanced.
Nelson (1996) in Therapeutic Occupation: A definition,” aims to provide a systematic way for defining and understanding the various processes that underlie OT by introducing the concept of ______________
Occupational Synthesis