Week 2 Everything Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

On a Federal level, s1 of the Australian Constitution provides

A

“The legislative power of the Commonwealth shall be vested in the Federal Parliament, which shall consist of the Queen, A Senate, and a House of Representatives, and which is hereinafter called ‘The Parliament” or the Parliament of the Commonwealth’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Section 1 of the Constitution

A

Section 1 of the Constitution therefore is the section which enabled and gave rise to the very existence of the Commonwealth Parliament of Australia. s 1 is also the section which created a bi-cameral form of Government – that is, a Government consisting of two Houses of Parliament.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Legislative power is the power to make law. Federal v State

A

In Australia and on a Federal level, this power is exercised by the Federal Parliament (that is, both Houses of Parliament).
On a State level, this power is exercised by the various State and Territory parliaments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Law made by Parliament on a Federal, State or Territory level, is known as

A

legislation – e.g. an Act of Parliament, or a Statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whether on a State, Territory or Federal level, law made by Parliament is ‘supreme’.

A

This means that if there is a contradiction or inconsistency between law made by Parliament (on any level) and a decision of any Court in the Australian Court hierarchy (on any level), to the extent of that contradiction or inconsistency, Parliamentary law will prevail. This is known as the supremacy of Parliament (on any level of Government). The supremacy of parliament therefore, means that Parliament is the ‘sovereign lawmaker’.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The structure of parliament

A

13/3/19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lower House – Federal Parliament

A

The House of Representatives is the ‘people’s house’, providing equal representation for the people of Australia. Australia is divided into electorates – about 150 – with roughly equal numbers of voters, each of which elects a representative. The political party with the majority of members in the House of Representatives forms executive government. The Prime Minister is traditionally a member of the lower house.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Upper House – Federal Parliament

A

The Senate is the ‘States’ house’. It protects the rights of the States. There is an equal number of Senators from each State (12) in order to protect the interests of the less populous States. The Territories are represented by 2 Senators each. The founders of the Constitution recognised the danger that the Lower House would favour those States, and the composition of the Upper House addressed that risk by giving the States the opportunity to oppose any biased legislation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Before a proposed law is approved and passed by both Houses of Parliament, it is referred to as a ‘Bill’.

A

Bills are drafted by Parliamentary Counsel who specialise in drafting legislation. To become law, a Bill must pass three ‘readings’ in each of the two Houses of Parliament. It must then receive the Royal Assent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The first reading

A

The first reading is a formal reading of the Bill’s title and a distribution of the copies of the Bill. This usually takes place in the House of Representatives. There is no debate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The second reading.

A

The relevant Minister delivers a speech outlining the content and objectives of the Bill and members debate the Bill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The third reading

A

The third reading involves voting on the Bill. If a majority votes for the Bill, the Bill is passed and is subsequently sent to the Senate - the Upper House where the same procedure is followed. If the Bill is passed by a majority vote at the third reading, then it has passed both Houses of Parliament and is sent to the Governor-General for Royal Assent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A Bill that has been successfully passed by both Houses of Parliament is not law until it receives the Royal Assent of the Crown Representative.

A

On a Federal level, the Crown Representative (representing the Queen) is the Governor-General. Traditionally, the Crown Representative acts on the advice of the executive government.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How to dissolve Federal Parliament

A

In relation to the Federal Parliament, S.57 of the Australian Constitution provides that if the Upper House fails to pass a Bill passed by the Lower House, and after three months the Bill is once again passed by the Lower House and rejected by the Upper House, the Governor-General is empowered to dissolve both Houses, known as a double dissolution.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Parliament in operation: Proposal, Drafting and Submission to the Houses

A

13/3/19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Three readings of a Bill

A

13/9/19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

The decision to change existing law or to introduce new law may arise for three reasons:

A

The executive government decides to change the law or create a new law to implement its policies.

The executive government is pressured by one or more sources (shown in the transparency following) to do so.

A member of Parliament who is not a member of the executive government may initiate the proposed change to or creation of a new law. This is referred to as a Private Member’s Bill.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Pressure to change the law comes from

A

Public servants

Law reform body

Media

Courts

Government policy

Lobby groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Judicial power

A

Judicial power is the power to interpret the law and to apply it in the resolution of particular disputes. Judicial power is exercised by the courts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

A court hierarchy:

A

allows a system of appeals, allows different forms of hearing according to the gravity of the case, and facilitates the operation of the doctrine of precedent. Each court in the hierarchy has its own jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Federal court hierarchy

A

13/3/19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

State court hierarchy

A

13/3/19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Jurisdiction

A

Jurisdiction refers to the scope of the court’s authority, either Federal or State. Each of the Courts on either level has original and appellate jurisdiction as well as criminal and civil jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

The Adversarial System:

A

The system of dispute resolution used in modern Australian courts is called the adversarial system. The parties ‘fight it out’ until one of them is declared a winner by an impartial referee in the form of a judge. Within strict rules of procedure and evidence, the parties have complete responsibility for the conduct of their case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The Court Processes:

A

The judge observes and listens to the proceedings, ensures that all rules of procedure and evidence are applied fairly and consistently, allows both parties to be heard and, unless there is a jury, decides the case. The adversarial system can be contrasted with the inquisitorial system used in courts in civil law countries.

26
Q

Court processes

A

13/3/19

27
Q

The trial process

A

13/3/19

28
Q

The Doctrine of Precedent

A

The decisions of most courts are recorded and published, leading to the creation of a second source of law: case law also known as judge-made law or common law. According to the doctrine of precedent, in reaching a decision about a question of law the court must follow the decisions of courts higher than itself in the same hierarchy of courts within the particular jurisdiction.

29
Q

But not everything a court says in a judgment is binding on lower courts in the same court hierarchy.

A

Only the ratio decidendi (ratio) of the case is binding on lower courts. The ratio is that part of the court decision which provides the legal reasoning for the decision made on the facts before the court. The obiter dicta is that part of the court’s decision which is not necessary for the decision made on the facts before the court.

30
Q

Obiter

A

Obiter is a hypothetical example given by the court as to how it might have decided differently if the facts had been different. Obiter is not therefore binding on lower courts in the same court hierarchy. Obiter is persuasive only. This means that any court has a choice as to whether or not to follow the obiter.

31
Q

The Meaning of Persuasive Authority:

A

Decisions of courts outside the particular hierarchy are also not binding but may be persuasive. Persuasive means that the Court has a choice as to whether or not to follow the non-binging aspect of the decision of the Court outside the particular court hierarchy.

32
Q

There are also a number of ways by which a court can avoid having to follow a previous decision:

A

Distinguishing

Overruling

33
Q

Distinguishing

A

To distinguish a case is not to question the validity of the decision made. It is merely to argue that given the marked difference in law and/or fact between the two cases, the decision of the higher court which would normally be binding, does not apply.

34
Q

Rejecting Or Overruling Precedent:

A

A court may also reject or overrule precedent about questions of law.

35
Q

Alternative Dispute Resolution:

A

in commercial situations, it is often less destructive to on-going business relationships than litigation, and it relieves the pressure on, and therefore the costs of, maintaining the court system.

36
Q

Other Methods of Dispute Resolution:

A

Other methods that can be used to settle disputes include negotiation, mediation, conciliation and arbitration.

37
Q

ADR is becoming increasingly common in Australia and other countries because:

A

it is generally cheaper, faster, more private and less stressful than going to court

in commercial situations, it is often less destructive to on-going business relationships than litigation, and

it relieves the pressure on, and therefore the costs of, maintaining the court system.

38
Q

Negotiation, mediation and litigation

A

13/3/19

39
Q

Legal research

A

To use the law to solve legal problems, you need to know where it can be found.

40
Q

Relevant legal research materials are:

A

primary legal materials

case law

legislation

secondary legal materials.

41
Q

Primary legal materials

A

Primary legal materials are the direct sources of the law, being legislation, the law made by parliaments, and case law, the law made by judges. Be careful that the legislation has not been amended or repealed.

42
Q

Secondary legal materials

A

Secondary legal materials are those materials that do not comprise the law itself but instead explain and expand upon the primary legal materials. Secondary legal materials are not binding law, but they can be persuasive. Secondary legal material includes law textbooks, law journal articles, legal dictionaries and legal encyclopaedias.

43
Q

ratio decidendi

A

The ratio decidendi (‘reason for the decision’) is that part of a judge’s decision which sets out the legal principle (legal reasoning) upon which the decision was based, on the facts before the court and which is binding precedent.

44
Q

Interpreting the law

A

Legal writing is notoriously difficult to read and understand, and legal texts are often criticised for being long, complex, and repetitive, and even badly organised, unnecessarily elaborate and confusing. Many jurisdictions now require that certain documents be in plain language.

45
Q

Statutory interpretation

A

A number of general and specific rules regarding the reading and interpretation of legal texts have been developed in the context of statutory interpretation. Statutory interpretation is the interpretation by the courts of legislation when called upon to decide whether or not the legislation applies.

46
Q

Statutory interpretation: Significance

A

Statutory interpretation is a very precise method used by the judges when called upon to interpret a word, phrase, sentence, or an entire section or sections contained in legislation. The need to be precise is obvious because the way in which a court interprets legislation will determine how narrowly or broadly that legislation will apply in the future and therefore, how it will impact society on a personal, business, and/or criminal and/or civil level.

47
Q

Statutory interpretationGeneral Rules: The Literal Rule

A

Always begin by reading a legal text literally, with words and phrases given their ordinary and natural meanings.

48
Q

Statutory interpretation General Rules: The Golden Rule

A

If reading a text literally leads to an absurd result, modify the literal meaning so as to avoid the absurdity

49
Q

Statutory interpretation General Rules: Purpose Rule

A

If reading the text literally does not reveal the meaning of the text, refer to the apparent purpose of the author when drafting the text:

50
Q

Statutory Interpretation Specific Rules: Contextual Approach

A

According to this approach, rather than interpret the words used in the Act individually, a court should take into account the various contexts of those words

51
Q

Statutory interpretation Specific Rules: The Class Rule

A

This rule provides that if specific words are used and are followed by general words, then the general words are restricted by the preceding specific words.

52
Q

Statutory interpretationSpecific Rules: Inclusion and Exclusion

A

What is specifically included in legislation is what that legislation aims to cover. It does not aim to cover what has been excluded from and is not referred to, in that legislation.

53
Q

Statutory interpretation Specific Rules: Give Each To Each

A

This term deals with attributing certain provisions in a Statute to certain other provisions mentioned in that Statute.

54
Q

Statutory Interpretation Specific Rules: Specific/General Provisions

A

This rule provides that if there are both specific and general provisions in a statute and there is an inconsistency between them, then the specific provision shall prevail over the general.

55
Q

Statutory interpretationSpecific Rules: Later/Earlier Provisions

A

To the extent that there is any inconsistency between the two, later provisions take precedence over earlier provisions.

56
Q

How to solve a legal problem

A

Identify the legal issue

Identify the relevant legal rules

Apply the rules to the facts

Reach a conclusion

57
Q

Legal writing: Formality and precision

A

Legal writing is formal rather than conversational.

The tone of the writing is serious, polite and respectful.

58
Q

Legal writing: Clarity

A

Legal writing should have clarity.

59
Q

Drafting a simple contract

A

Recall that a contract is a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties. A contract contains the promises made by each of the parties. If either party fails to keep those promises, they will be in breach of the contract.

60
Q

To draft a contract:

A

Step 1: prepare an outline.

Step 2: draft the contract by listing the topics in logical order with each topic in its own substantive clause.

Step 3: test and revise the contract.