week 2 - comparative politics Flashcards

1
Q

Howard Wiarda

A
  • Comparative politics is the systematic comparative study of the worlds political systems
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Eckstein

A
  • comparison in the social sciences is the substitute for experimentation in the natural sciences
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lijphart - experimental, statistical, comparative

A
  • experimental: unit homogeneity, more similar cases less likely factors influencing the relationship between X and Y, random assignment, control of treatment
  • statistical: partial correlation (regression analysis to control for other possible explanatory variables), random sampling
  • comparative: structured study of similarities and differences across carefully selected cases
  • case study: detailed case investigation, at least implicitly comparative
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Two ways of structuring comparisons

A
  1. Most similar systems design (method of difference)

2. Most different systems design (method of agreement)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Most similar systems design
A
  • different outcome: Y and Not Y (dependent variable)
  • common systemic features permit the isolation of that which separates the cases (independent variable)
  • covariation of independent and dependent variables
  • distinguishing feature that must be explanatory - must come with a compelling causal story
  • ex. One outcome is different
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Most different systems design
A

Countries that are substantially different

  • common outcome Y (case 1) and y (case 2)
  • different systemic features permit the isolation of that which unites the cases
  • establishing covariation between independent variables and outcome
  • this factor must be explanatory - must come with a compelling causal story
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

MSSD Illustration for comparison method #1

A

E.g. Stathis Kalyvas, the rise of Christian democracy in Europe

  • France does not develop a durable Christian Democratic Party
  • France does not differ in Catholicism
  • but in its level of political instability (sets France apart)
  • which prevented the Catholic Church from forming its own competitive Democratic Party
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

MSSD Illustration for comparison method #2

A

E.g. Steven Levitsky and Lucan Way, between a shock and a hard place

  •  successful implementation of neoliberal adjustment policies in two very different countries in 1990s
  • Argentina more successful than surrounding countries, in spite of strong labour movements
  • solidarity (polish, union movement) and Peronism (Argentina)
  • left party sharing social linkages, mutual trust and identities with labour movements
  • Labour left party alliance lasted longer in Argentina, stronger party more incentives for labour leaders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Comparative criticisms

A
  • deterministic in a probabilistic age (if X then Y not common, rather if X then Y #% of the time)
  • don’t entirely abandon rejected explanatory factors
  • operationalization: abstract phenomena (ex. Democracy) measurement error a problem
  • complex causation: multiple causes, interactive effects, too few cases for all the causal combinations
  • cases are not sufficiently independent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is the comparative method the right method?

A
Choice of method depends on 
- research question 
- concept formation 
- theory 
Good questions save time, narrowing the research focus and providing direction
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Concept formation

A
  • we create concepts
  • they should be clear and coherent, and helpful in addressing our research question
  • ladder of abstraction: the more abstract, the less grounded in detail
  • concept stretching if too abstract
  • concepts influence the number of available cases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“Study” - concepts are crucial (Thea Skocpol)

A

What is a social policy revolution?
- not all forms of contentious collective action (largest set)
- not merely a political revolution (large set)
- but violent political overturn combined with p transformation of economic and social power (small set)
Skocpol aims to generalize, but only based on her limited set of cases: France, Russia, China

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Theory?

A
  • meaningful statements about the relationship between phenomena (ex. Change in X effects a change in Y)
  • captures the way the world works at some level of generality
    
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The role of theory

A
  • source of questions and puzzles, predictions and anomalies (ex. China is becoming a democracy)
  • basis for framing concepts (as in Skocpol, ex. Social revolutions)
  • Guidance in pursuing research, where to start
  • assistance in interpreting findings, drawing implications
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

“Study” - theoretical approaches

A
  • broad theoretical perspectives, operative a various levels
    a) rationality - self interest
    b) culture - values, beliefs, ideas
    c) socioeconomic structuralism - material conditions shape and interests, constrain actors, with an emphasis on class
    d) institutionalism - formal and informal rules shape interests and actions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Comparative - what is a case?

A
  • Hall: units in which the relevant outcome takes on a specific value
  • Key question: what is it a case of?
    -so, cases must be constructed - states, movements, episodes 
    Single case study
  • Great detail possible
  • more than just variables
  • powerful if well selected 
17
Q

Systemic process analysis (process tracing)

A

Alternative to correlation-based approaches, including a comparative method:

  • emphasize key explanatory theories
  • draw out their predictions in full
  • identify observations relevant to these predictions
  • test: does the entire causal chain manifest?
  • set rival theories at odds in this fashion
18
Q

Carles Boix

A
  • first, pursuit broad statistical relationship between democracy (dependent) and inequality (independent)
  • then, test it in detailed comparative case studies of US states and Swiss Cantons