Week 2 Flashcards
How is NPV calculated?
What will we typically need to estimate?
NPV = discounted FVs - initial costs.
To estimate, we need to future CF estimate (both how much and when), The discount rate estimate, and estimated initial costs.
Minimum acceptance criteria for a project using NPV?
How do we rank them?
Minimum acceptance = NPV > 0.
If there are multiple projects to choose from we should choose the one with the highest NPV.
How will our minimum return relate to net present value?
The minimum we would want an investment to return is the amount which makes our net present value 0.
How should our discount rate relate to the riskiness of the investment?
Our discount rate should depend on the riskiness of the investment.
Does the term structure of the discount rate have to be flat?
What else could it be?
No it doesn’t, instead
- We can use the YTM of different risk free maturity investments for the different CFs.
- We could use the short rate of each year leading up to the CF’s year.
How can we find the expected value of a cash value if the events are uncertain?
If we know their probability, we can use the expected value (sum of probability x probability’s associated value) for our CF.
What is the IRR?
The discount rate that sets net present value to 0.
Acceptance criteria for projects using IRR?
What is the ranking criteria?
We will only accept a project if the IRR > required return.
When ranking different projects we will prefer projects with a higher IRR.
Reinvestment assumption for IRR?
Why is it wrong?
That all future CFs can be reinvested at the IRR.
This assumption is wrong, as these modified CFs produced by reinvestment cannot be associated with the project.
So we do not need to consider this assumption when considering a project.
If we graph the net present value versus the discount rate, where do we find the IRR?
If we graph NVP vs discount rate, the IRR is the x-axis intercept.
Main problems with the IRR?
- NPV easier to calculate
- A higher IRR is better for investment projects, while a lower IRR is better for financing projects.
- The IRR doesn’t exist
- When there are multiple IRRs
- The IRR assumes the term structure is flat. When term structure is not flat using IRR can lead to bad decisions.
- IRR does not help you choose between mutually exclusive projects that involve size, scale and timing problems
Difference between an investment project and financing project in terms of CFs?
What will be the relationship between the NPV and the discount rate in both?
When will the IRR be the same for a financing and investment project?
Investment project = Initial cash outflow then cash inflows, this will have a downward sloping relationship between NPV and discount rate.
Financing project = Cash inflow then cash outflows, there will be an upward sloping relationship between NPV and the discount rate.
IRR will be same for both if we flip the signs on each CF.
How is the no or multiple IRR problem typically solved?
MIRR. Though it is not actually the internal rate of return of the project.
MIRR using the discounting approach?
Discount all negative CFs back to time zero and add them to the initial CF, then calculate the MIRR as we would the IRR.
MIRR using the reinvestment approach?
Compound all CFs except for the time zero CF to the end of the project’s life and sum them.
Then,
Initial CF/terminal value = (1+MIRR)^maximum period.