week 12 Flashcards
explain evidence for use of foot orthotics to control foot motion and pressure relief
- orthotics support longitudinal and transverse arch of foot
- control magnitude and rate of foot pronation during walking
- material density orthoses should be based on patient preference/comfort
total rearfoot eversion was (biggest or smallest) for soft vs hard inserts
- total rearfoot eversion was smallest for soft inserts and twice as large for hard inserts
- so sensory feedback was key to controlling foot motion, not just “posting”
what pathologies benefit from orthotics
- plantar fasciitis
- posterior tibialis tendonitis
- anterior knee pain
- why? orthotics limit only 2 degrees, but 2 degrees is 20% of total ROM (8-10 degrees)
pros and cons of custom vs pre-fab orthotics
orthotics of EBP
- foot orthosis should not be stand-alone treatment - use other exercise/ortho treatment
- foot orthoses with total plantar contact can decrease strain on plantar fascia and reduce collapse of medial arch
- foot orthoses can provide short-term (3 months) pain and function improvement - not long term
- type of orthotic (custom vs pre-fab) makes no difference in degree of pain or function improvement - patient comfort is most important
indications for orthotic devices
- goal of any orthosis is to address pathological symptoms
- an orthosis will do one or all of these: control pain, motion, deformity
an orthosis with do one or all three of these:
- motion: by stopping, limiting, or assisting it at a specific joint or position
- pain: by limiting or stopping motion, or by reducing stress to a joint through support or through shock-reducing cushion
- deformity: by supporting an existing deformity and preventing it from progressing, by using to alter tha deformity or change the position to what is considered natural
goals/considerations of orthotics
- meets individual’s mobility needs and goals
- maximizes stance phase stability
- minimizes abnormal alignment
- minimally compromises swing phase
- effectively pre-positions the limb for initial contact
- ensuring the device will work with the patient’s preferred AD
- comfort: can be worn for long periods without damaging skin or causing pain, can be easily donned and doffed
basic principles of orthoses
- balanced parallel force system used to control joint motion
- three points of force application required to control motion in one plane: one corrective force and two stabilizing forces
- the larger the corrective force, the larger the surface area required for the force application (with the goal of staying with soft tissue tolerance for pressure)
6 orthoses
- FO: foot orthosis
- AFO: ankle foot orthosis
- KAFO: knee ankle foot orthosis
- HKAFO: hip knee ankle foot orthosis
- KO: knee orthosis
- HO: hip orthosis
name for the joints they cross (mostly)
6 orthoses
- FO: foot orthosis
- AFO: ankle foot orthosis
- KAFO: knee ankle foot orthosis
- HKAFO: hip knee ankle foot orthosis
- KO: knee orthosis
- HO: hip orthosis
name for the joints they cross (mostly)
FO: foot orthosis
- rigid, semi-rigid, or flexible
- custom fabrication and off the shelf
- subtalar joint support: frontal plane
- fits into shows – low profile
- options: full length/partial length, soft vs firm material, reinforcement, off-loading
FO indications
- pes planus/pronation
- pes cavus/supination
- plantar fasciitis
- heel spurs
- metatarsalgia
- mild-moderate calcaneal varus/valgus
- mold-moderate midfoot deformity
- laxity
- diabetic neuropathy
UCBL: university of cal berkley laboratory
- more corrective
- thermoplastic
- custom fabrication
- controls calcaneus and midfoot: transverse plane, frontal plane
- most corrective foot orthotic
- indications: flexible moderate pronation/calcaneal deformity (Down syndrome), moderate deformity, plastic materails (range of rigid support), require larger/wider shoe size
SMO: supra malleolar orthosis
- cross ankle
- plastic materials
- custom fabrication
- controls calcaneus, midfoot: tranverse plane, frontal plane
- ankle support: frontal plant
- allows free dorsiflexion and plantarflexion
- softer materials
SMO indications
- ankle instability: frontal plane (M/L)
- flexible calcaneal and midfoot deformity: frontal plan, transverse plane
- moderate-severe deformity
- visible above shoe line
ankle foot orthoses
universal AFO fitting goals
- increase ankle stability
- improve cadence
- increase balance/step length
- limit “foot drop”
- increase knee stability at mid stance
- limit genu recurvatum
- create heel-to-toe gait pattern efficiency
- desire for guided control in 3 planes
metal AFO
- old school
- aluminum sidebars attached to a shoe, leater/metal calf band
- custom fabrication
- articulation at ankle: free motion, limited motion, assisted DF/PF
- controls ankle motion: sagittal plane
metal AFO indications
- ankle motion management: sagittal plane only
- edema: constant fluctuating volume
- patient preference
- contraindications: increased weight, more time for fabrication, increased maintenance
PLS-AFO: posterior leaf spring
- thermoplastic materials
- custom and off the shelf options
- material flexibility at the posterior plastic strut (3/4 inch to 1.5 inch wide): sagittal plane(df and pf)
- footplate support:transverse plane (midfoot)
- light weight
PLS-AFO indications
- drop foot
- tibialis anterior weakness
- dorsiflexion paralysis
- lightweight
- low profile
- off the shelf options
- minimal foot deformity
dynamic carbon fiber AFO
- carbon fiber materials
- off the shelf, some custom options
- energy storing properties: sagittal plane
- indications: thin lightweight material, low profile, drop foot, df/pf weakness, CVA/MS/neuropathy
SA-AFO: solid ankle foot orthosis
- thermoplastic or carbon materials
- custom fabrication
- trimlines anterior to malleoli
- fixed ankle position for all phases of gait
- 3 planes of control: saggital plane stability, frontal plane support, transverse plane support