Week 11 - Nature vs Nurture: Twins and Atypical development Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the updated theoretical model?

A

There are innate mechanisms but they must have input and be nurtured in order to flourish; a combination of nature and nurture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What can provide evidence for the new theoretical model?

A
  • Twin studies: exemplifies nature
  • Input: exemplifies nurture
  • Learning conditions: exemplifies conditions needed for learning
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Monozygotic twins vs non-twins and dizygotic twins study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Tomblin and Buckwalter 1998
  • MZ twins will show more similar language skills than DZ
  • DZ twins will show more similar language skills than non-twins
  • DZ pairs more similar than non-twins
  • Suggests genetic role with environmental factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Monozygotic vs Dizygotic twins environment study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Viding et al. 2004
  • Limited influence from nurture and strong role of nature found
  • Gender didn’t cause environmental differences
  • DZ same sex vs DZ opposite were closely related
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Adopted children study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Thompson et al. 1985
  • Adopted children, adopted parents and biological parents
  • Adopted childs language correlated with biological parent, not adopted parent
  • Evidence for nature
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Atypical development vocal but not hearing study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Oller and Eilers 1988
  • Some children could hear, some couldn’t
  • All infants babbled
  • Hearing infants babbled 6-10 months
  • Deaf infants babbled 11-26 months but wasn’t canonical
  • 3 Infants who babbled 5 months after onset developed some speech
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Atypical development vocal but hear late study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Niparko et al. 2010
  • Deaf children
  • Cochlear implant before 18 months, 18 months-3 years or after 3 years
  • Children who got implant earlier developed better language skills
  • Language acquisition can take place if conditions of environment are sufficient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Atypical development hearing but not vocal study

Name
Date
Method
Results

A
  • Jiang and Morrison 2003
  • Tracheotomised mean age 3 years
  • Children with shorter tracheotomy had more typical language use
  • Tracheotomy doesn’t delay much, neurological issues are more prevalent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summary of nature vs nurture evidence

A
  • Suggets importance of both biological and environmental factors
  • Nature must be correct for Nurture to be effective
  • Critical period = environmental factors need to be correct during period to be effective
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly