Week 10 Exchange rate policy Flashcards
What is a sudden stop?
Before 2008 countries in Europe were enjoying negative current account and having flow of capital from other countries.
This caused a very large unemployment.
What is a real exchange rate depreciation in terms of another variable?
Real exchange rate depreciation is an increase in e
What happened to the Eurozone countries during the sudden stop?
What was particularly strange that happened to Eurozone
-CA was deficits but then started getting less negative
-wages were increasing after 2008
-Unemplyoment was increasing after 2008
-These eurozxone countries did not have a real exchange rate depreciation.
As they were part of a monetary union
How do you show wage rigidities?
wt is greater than or equaled to lamda wt-1
With nominal rigidities lamda is close to 1
What empirical data shows evidence for nominal wage rigidities.
In great depression unemplyoment rose by 31%
but wages only fell by 0.6% in same time period
What is a historical example that being in a monetary union is bad?
When 1929 depression hit some countries like UK left Gold Standard
As a result,
What is the set up of that pins down exchange rate and unemployment
Two periods
two goods traded and non traded
PT = domestic price of traded goods
PN = domestic price of non-traded goods
P*T = foreign price of traded goods
St = nominal exchange rate
pt = PN/PT
Law of one price PT = PT . ST
Let PT =1
B*1 which are denominated in
What is a case study of a country that shows the impact of having a fixed exchange rate with a sudden stop
Argentina 1996-2006
After 1996 they had sharp increase in unemplyoment
-Nominal wages rose
-Real wage rose
In 2002 they stopped pegging their currency to the dollar and devalued it.
This then causes a large drop in unemployment
And a drop in the real wage
What do fixed exchange rate and nominal wage rigidities imply in tandem?
That real wages are not able to move.
What is the relative price of non-tradeables in the two period model?
pt = PN/ PT
What is the real exchange rate in the two period model and why is this?
Equaled to the relative price of non traded good PN / PT
What does relative price mean in the two period model?
-It is the price of non-traded goods w.r.t traded goods
What is the problem of the households in the traded and non traded goods two period model?
what is the framework?
C1T = consumption period 1 of traded goods
C1N = consumption period 1 of non traded goods
C2T = consumption period 2 of traded goods
C2N = consumption period 2 of non traded goods
Yt = income in terms of tradable.
r1 interest rate on assets
Households want to max
U(C1T, C1N) + U(C2T, C2N) S.T BC
What are the one period budget constraint in the model with traded and non traded goods
How do we get the IBC?
P1T . C1T + P1N .C1N + PT . B1 = PT . Y1 + (1+r0)B0
P2T . C2T + P2N . C2N + PT . B2 = PT . Y2 + (1+r1) . B1
We divide everything by PT
B*2 = 0
IBC
c1T +p1C1N + C2T + P2C2N / 1+r1 = Y1 + Y2 / 1+r1
What is a first order condition given by the traded and non-traded good model?
What can this be interpreted as?
U1(C1N, C1T) / U2(C2N, C2T) = p1
MRS between tradable and non-tradable = relative price / rer (NT w.r.t tradable
This is because p1 is relative price of non traded so if this increases they switch between non traded to traded.
Can be interpreted as the demand function of non-tradables as a function of the RER.