Week 10-Episodic memory processes across the adult lifespan Flashcards
What is the Component Process Model of Episodic Memory? (Moscovitch et al., 2016)
- Perception Binding
Sensory-to-medial temporal lobe (MTL)
regions, including the hippocampus:
Features > Objects > Contexts
Sense of self as the experiencer - Temporary Maintenance
Working memory Prefrontal cortex(PFC)-
dependent
-Helps with decision making - Long-term Maintenance
Stabilisation
Integration
Hippocampus-cortex interactions - Retrieval
Working memory “reconstruction”
-Is a reinstatement off the perceptual phase
What is the “WHAT” in Episodic Memory? (Gilboa & Moscovitch, 2021)
At encoding, multiple representations of the experienced event are created:
Event-specific (has perceptual richness i.e., the here and now). depends on the occipital lobe and posterior hippocampus
Event-general (“schemas” i.e., script of event), depends on the angular gyrus and ventromedial prefrontal cortex
Abstract knowledge related to the experienced event (i.e., knowing what it may entail e.g., cultural celebrations) (lateral posterior cortex areas)
The relative dominance of one representation type over another at encoding/retrieval depends on:
Availability of attentional resources
Prior knowledge (stuck in a perceptually rich environment however)
Current goal relevance
(at retrieval) time since encoding (longer the time, the more schematic representation occurs i.e., a script of the moment)
(at retrieval) type of retrieval cue
Episodic Memory: What is meant by the “self” as the experiencer? (Simons et al., 2022)
Sense of self in the experienced event is associated with:
First-person perspective
Autonoetic consciousness (Tulving, 2001) (sense of self-awareness in a past episode)
Awareness of one’s existence and identity in subjective time: self-continuity
Mental time travel: re-experience (past) vs pre-experience (future)
Appears late in the development (takes 6-7 years to develop due to cognitive control resources developing)
Varies across individuals
Ageing effects on episodic memory: What are binding deficits?
The ability to remember item-item/item-context (i.e., multiple features in a scene) associations declines more sharply with age relative to memory for individual items (Castel & Craik, 2003; Old & Naveh-Benjamin, 2008; Troyer et al., 2011).
Higher false alarm rate (i.e., poorer discrimination and recognition ability of a pair) on tasks probing memory for item-item/item-context associations (rather than individual items).
False alarm rates are further increased in older adults when there is higher visual similarity among the to-be-remembered items (Stark & Stark, 2017). (this aging deficit in associative memory is due to a deficit in the perceptual stage)
Ageing effects on Episodic Memory: What was found in the Binding/Discrimination Effects 1? (Stark & Stark, 2017)
Participants: 26 younger adults (21- 38 years) and 28 older adults (59-84 years).
-Showing them multiple images with several features and asking if needs to be outside or inside
The surprise memory test contained items identical to those studied, completely new items (novel foils) and new items similar to those studied (similar lures).
Relative to younger adults, older adults show poorer mnemonic discrimination (the number of correct decisions) among both objects and scenes (which requires finer grained perceptual representations and the binding of these individual features)
-Both old and young great at recognising objects that are old
Ageing effects on Episodic Memory: What was found in the Binding/Discrimination Effects 2? (Bouffard et al., 2024)
Participants: 31 younger adults (19 ± 1.72 years) and 32 older adults (69.21 ± 4.04 years).
-Similar object distinct scene e.g., backpack with forest then beach etc.,
-Distinct object similar scene e.g., forest with torch then bacon etc.,
-Similar scene similar object
-3 types of judgements: Remember (know its been shown before), Know (knew item was presented but no recollection of the context it was presented in) and New (remember new details about the object)
-Presented an object and scene and asked participants if they had been presented together
Recombined pair: both scene and object had been studied, but they were not paired together at study.
-When the objects are similar older adults performed more poorly with false alarms, but when it is a recombined pair, there was no difference between the young and old adults showing that older adults tend to rely on individual objects, distinct objects to base their memory representations.
Ageing effects on episodic memory: What is functional neural dedifferation?
Among older (relative to younger) adults, different types of visual stimuli (e.g., faces, places) evoke less differentiated patterns of brain activity (Bowman et al., 2019; Koen & Rugg, 2019), during both encoding and retrieval (Pauley et al., 2023) (i.e., similar activation for different things).
Older > Younger (Deng et al., 2021):
Early visual cortex: less differentiated to various sensory features
Anterior lateral temporal lobe (ATL): more differentiated to categorical features (i.e., semantic similarity) (i.e., older adults show more activation in this)
Older > Younger (Deng et al., 2021):
Impaired memory representations in the early visual cortex and hippocampus
Enhanced memory representations in the anterior lateral temporal lobe (ATL) (in regards to perception and retrieval, adults are better at differentiating the stimuli in regards to meaning).
Ageing effects on episodic memory: What did Koen & Rugg (2019) find with functional neural dedifferation types?
-Younger adults tend to show a more differentiated response in object scene regions.
-Objects are less sensitive and responsive to older adults (attentuation)
-The object area doesn’t really change how it responds to the object in older adults but rather enhances and moves onto areas such as scenes or faces (broadening). There can be a combination of attenuation and broadening (i.e., less responsive to objects but enhances to scenes).
Ageing effects on episodic memory: What is the impact of structural neural atrophy?
Global cortical volume loss accounted for declines in visuospatial ability, processing speed and global memory from age 70+ years (Cox et al., 2021).
Structural integrity of the hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus is particularly predictive of superior episodic memory in older adults (60+ years), especially among males (Köhncke et al., 2021).
-Decrease in total cortical volume with age.
Ageing effects on episodic memory: How does structure vs function differ? (Evangelista et al., 2021)
Reduced activation in the DLPFC ROIs on a working memory task and reduced DLPFC greater neural integrity (i.e., surface area) were independently linked to poorer working memory performance.
-Measured levels of atrophy and activation in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during a working memory task
Ageing effects on episodic memory: What are some neurochemical contributers?
Greater noradrenergic (locus coeruleus, LC) integrity is linked to superior episodic memory ability (Dahl et al., 2023), while gray matter decay in LC predicts the transition from healthy ageing to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) (Tang et al., 2023).
Greater dopaminergic (substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area) integrity is linked to superior working memory
ability (Dahl et al., 2023).
Age-related declines in hippocampal neurogenesis are linked to changes in the organization of the cholinergic system with adverse effects on working memory performance (Kirshenbaum et al., 2023).
Neurocognitive ageing: What is the link between maintenance, compensation and reserve? (Cabeza et al., 2018)
-These 3 components are thought to underpin the individual differences in episodic memory
Maintenance:
-Maintenance of neural resources and cognitive demands. This tends to change with things such as brain injuries however those who are better able to recruit will have a greater availability of neural repair processes i.e., counteracts
-These structures decline meaning greater demand of resources with older age but a decline in availability in neural repair
Compensation:
-As the demands rises, the individual should be able to recruit additional neural processes to successfully meet these demands
-As age increases, the ability to recruit additional mechanisms to compensate for cognitive decline also declines
Reserve:
-Accumulates additional neural resources to support those lost as one ages
Neurocognitive ageing: Is episodic memory in older adults maintained? (Cabeza et al., 2018)
Older adults with stable their episodic memory performance across time (“maintainers” [4 years panel a, 20 years,
panel b]) showed smaller reductions in hippocampal volume and in hippocampal activation level (on episodic memory tasks) relative to older adults with declining episodic memory performance (”decliners”).
-Essentially decliners have reduced activation in the hippocampus and a greater reduction in hippocampal volume.
Neurocognitive ageing: How does upregulation help compensation? (Cabeza et al., 2018)
On the same task, older adults show increased brain activity for similar performance levels (relative to younger adults)
-Ask task activity increases, so does neural resources (older adults plateau earlier)
-4-5 letters there’s no difference but with 7 theres a massive decrease with older adults and a decrease in DLPFC activation
Neurocognitive ageing: How does selection help compensation? (Cabeza et al., 2018)
Older adults engage in a process not recruited by younger adults, yet available to
them and used by them under other conditions.
-To do well, older adults draw on their semantic memory processes rather than episodic