Week 10 Collaboration Flashcards

1
Q

Research Process (Circle?) from Inception to Report

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is not a job for one single person?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What do we need for a good health research?
1.
2.
3.
-
-

A

1)Financial resources
2)Different academic and technical skills
3)Access to population(s)
ØAn organized team
ØStructured collaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What do we need for a good health research?
1.
2.
3.
-
-

A

1)Financial resources
2)Different academic and technical skills
3)Access to population(s)
ØAn organized team
ØStructured collaboration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Research Team

A

Once an investigator has committed to doing a research project, it is helpful to assemble a team of collaborators early in the research process

For students, the first step is identifying at least one professor to serve as a mentor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Mentorship?

A

a formal or INFORMAL relationship in which a more experienced person (the mentor) offers professional development advice and guidance to a less experienced mentee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How to find a mentor?

A

-Ask classmates, colleagues, professors, supervisors who might be helpful mentors
-Search the profiles of researchers at the new investigator’s home institution
-Email the individuals identified as potential mentors to ask for professional development advice; an invitation to meet is not an agreement to serve as a mentor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Is this true: Mentor ≠ supervisor or instructor

A

YES
Mentor ≠ supervisor or instructor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The Mentor–Mentee Relationship

A

A new investigator should not agree to enter into a mentor–mentee relationship before gaining an informed understanding of several key matters, including:
-The potential mentor’s time availability, preferred frequency and style of communication
-The roles and responsibilities the mentor agrees to take on, the resources the mentor agrees to provide
-The expectations the mentor has of the mentee
Research supervisors appreciate when mentees:
ØCommunicate often with clear questions
ØAre honest about what they have done and what they plan to do
ØComplete assigned tasks satisfactorily and on time, maintain meticulous research records
ØAre open to receiving constructive criticism
ØRespect the mentor and the mentor’s time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Professional Development

A

The intentional process of establishing professional goals, identifying and completing activities that enable systematic progress toward achieving those goals
ØIncludes routinely evaluating performance, competencies, and growth
How?
ØCompleting online or in-person coursework about research methods
ØParticipating in journal clubs and in professional organizations
ØWorking as a research assistant
ØAttending and presenting at research conferences
ØEnrolling in training programs (online modules)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Communication within the Research Community

A

-Several general and discipline-specific social networking platforms are available for researchers to use for NETWORKING, having online conversations about methodologies and tools, SHARING RESOURCES, communicating about recent publications, and BUILDING A PROFESSIONAL ONLINE PRESENCE
-There are some impact metrics that show how much the researchers’ work have been communicated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ØBibliometrics:

A

quantitative analyses of written publications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

h-index:

A

an author has at least h publications that have each been cited at least h times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

i10 index:

A

a count of the number of publications by an author that have been cited at least 10 times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are two main issues with these metrics?

A

1)Articles with simpler methodologies are easier to understand and get more citations
2)Open-access articles are getting more citations especially by researchers from lower-resource countries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Ethics in Conducting Research
Responsible conduct of research

A

Ø A concept that encompasses research ethics, professionalism, and best practices for collaboration and communication with other researcher
ØBeing a supporting member of a research team provides a valuable opportunity to become familiar with disciplinary and professional standards, academic writing and publishing, and the habits of good coauthors

17
Q

Authorship

Most Articles have two and more Authors…
Co-authorship

A

-The process of two or more collaborators working together to write a research report/article
-Decisions about who will be listed as a coauthor on a report, poster, or paper, as well as the order in which those coauthors will be listed, should be made as early as possible in the research process
-Large research programs have an authorship committee

18
Q

Authorship Order
What are the main three?
LSM

A

Lead author
Senior author
Middle authors

Lead author: the person who conceptualizes the research, writes the frist drafts, does most of analysis, interpretation and discussion.
-Almost always the first person in the author list

Senior author(s): doing a lot but less than first author or are the research supervisors, goes 2nd or last depends on the organization policies

Middle authors: others with different levels of collaborations. Either in order from greatest to least contribution or alphabetically by family name
-Guided by the authorship committee
-Most new researchers serve as “middle authors” before becoming a lead author for the first time
-If you work hard, it is highly likely to publish your thesis, research projects, and be the first author

19
Q

Lead author:

A

the person who conceptualizes the research, writes the frist drafts, does most of analysis, interpretation and discussion.
-Almost always the first person in the author list

20
Q

Senior author(s):

A

doing a lot but less than first author or are the research supervisors, goes 2nd or last depends on the organization policies

21
Q

Middle authors:

A

others with different levels of collaborations. Either in order from greatest to least contribution or alphabetically by family name
-Guided by the authorship committee
-Most new researchers serve as “middle authors” before becoming a lead author for the first time
-If you work hard, it is highly likely to publish your thesis, research projects, and be the first author

22
Q

Summary of the author bullshit LSM

A
23
Q

Corresponding Author (usually (not always) the first author )
is responsible for
(so fucking mint touch our cocks)

A

-submission of the article
-formatting
-managing the review process
-the person to contact if you want to know more about the research
-other administration works
-communicating journal responses

24
Q

Authorship Rules
_____, the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, has established criteria for authorship in the health sciences that most journals in the field have adopted
What are the four rules? If you don’t know your going to make me MAAD)

A

ICMJE
1.Making SUBSTANTIAL contributions to conception or design of the study and/or to data collection, analysis, or interpretation
2.Approving the final version of the manuscript that is submitted to a publisher
3.Accepting RESPONSIBILITY for the integrity of the paper
4.Drafting the article and/or providing critical revisions of intellectual content

To earn coauthorship, all 4 ICMJE criteria must be met

25
Q

-

A

-There should be no GHOST authorship, the FAILURE TO INCLUDE as a coauthor on a manuscript a contributor who has made a substantial intellectual contribution to a research project

-There should be no GIFT authorship, which occurs when someone who HAS NOT EARNED authorship according to disciplinary standards is added to the list of authors of a manuscript