Week 10 Flashcards
There are 2 prominent models of discrimination in economics which are what?
Taste-based discrimination Belief based discrimination
What is Taste based discrimination?
Preference for certain traits when interacting
What is Belief based discrimination?
Individuals might believe that individual with different traits might behave differently.
What are problems with Belief based discrimination?
1) Sometimes there is arbitrary choice (based on random choice or personal whim, rather than any reason or system.) e.g. health insurance, but what would happen if an insurer would look at religion instead?
2) People have wrong beliefs about people( e.g. Ronny showed us that peoples perception of people who are Muslim compared, to the actual demographics are wrong)
We will now look at highway searches, what are some facts about highway searches?
Ethnic minority groups more likely to be stopped and searched.
Is highway searches belief based (BELIEF THAT ETHNIC MINORITIES LIKELY TO ENGAGE IN CRIMINAL ACTIVITES) or taste based ( OFFICERS ENJOY STOPPING MINORITES)?
We don’t know yet untill we solve using Theoretical modelling and empirical analysis.
To look at the racial bias in highway searches, what 2 important terms do we need to know?
Search intensity and Hit rate
What does search intensity mean?
The likelihood the police will search a driver of a particular race e.g. white, black
What is the hit rate?
Conditional that you search for drugs, what is the likelihood that you actualy found it in the vechile.
To model the game by driver and the police
For the police
1) what is the cost of searching the car
2) Reward if drug found
3) Payoff if doesn’t search
1) C>0
2) V>C (this compensates you for the cost of stopping the car)
3) 0 if driver doesnt search
To model the game by driver and the police
For the driver
What is the punishment if the driver is searched and has drugs?
What is the reward, if he carries drugs and not searched ?
What is the payoff id he doesn’t carry any drug?
Punishment if carries drug and searched -d<0
Gets reward if carries drug and not searched w>0( they sell drug)
Payoff is 0 if doesn’t carry the drug
Given that
Police:
- Cost of search/car: c>0
- Reward if drug is found: v>c
- Payoff is zero if does not search
Driver:
• Punished if carries drug and searched: -d<0
Gets rewarded if carries drugu and not searched W>0
• Payoff is zero if does not carry any drug
Draw matrix
Is there a pure strategy equilbrium in thisi game?
No there is no pure strategy within this game
If police searches → driver never carries drug → police should not search
If police does not searches → driver carries drug → police should search
As there is no pure strategy within this game what does that mean exists?
A mixed strategy equibrium
Lets say i commute a mixed strategy equilbrium and I use H for Player 2 and S for player 1 what is S and H?
H is going to be the hit rate ( as it will tell you given that you stopped are car for drugs,what is the likelihood it will have drugs in it or a fraction of cars with drugs)
S will be search rate ( it will tell you the fraction of police officers who stop a car
What are we assuming within this model?
Police have correct beliefs about the hit rate, h.
Lets now see how police treat different races now, suppose drivers are of race X and Y What are there payoffs.
Member of X: (dx, wx) (so a member x feels differently about going Jail then memeber of Y which represents D, the higher the D the more you worry going to jail. and have different rewards when they sell drugs)
Member of Y: (dy, wy) ( member of Y may feel differently about going to Jail then a member of X, which is represented by D, maybe going to Jail is fun to D is lower vice versa and have different rewards when they sell drugs)
Lets now see how police treat different races now, suppose drivers are of race X and Y what are police payoffs on the race X and Y?
If the driver is X: (cx, v)
If the driver is Y: (cy, v)
So reward is fixed.
The police have different costs /payoffs depending on race
If police is prejudiced (taste-based) against X: cx < cy
Presumably, because the police likes to harass X-drivers. ( they get a kick when they arrest someone from race X, hence cost is lower)
Lets say story 1 is that suppose there are two races X and Y, the reson why police stop 1 race more than the other is because of belief based discriminiation to prove this what are we going to do?
We are shutting down the taste based aspect as now Cx = Cy so the police doesn’t get a kick on stopping a certain race more than others. So the police only stop one race than the other based on there belief about a certain race.
To prove our story that police stop some races more than others due to belief based discrimination, draw a 2 by 2 matrix for race x and race y, knowing that Cx = Cy and
Races might differ in their payoffs:
Member of X: (dx, wx)
Member of Y: (dy, wy)
Payoff of Police might depend on the race of the driver
If the driver is X: (cx, v)
If the driver is Y: (cy, v)
We replace the -C with Cx for Race X and . d with dx, W with Wx
We replace -C with Cy for Race Y, d with Dy and W with Wy
What is the Hit rate for Race X ?
Calculate Mixed strategy
as Cx = Cy you can get rid off the Cx and just use -c
You keep the rest of the subscripts as they are different for the different races so
h X (v-c) + 1-h (-c) = h x(0) + 1-h ( 0)
h =c/v
What is the hit rate of race Y
Calculate Mixed strategy
as Cx = Cy you can get rid off the Cy and just use -c
You keep the rest of the subscripts as they are different for the different races so