Week 10 Flashcards
Objective measures of Personality
Typically administered as paper-and-pencil, or via computer.
Contains short answer items for which the assesse’s task is to select one response from those provided.
The term “objective” in relation to personality measures must be
considered with caution.
Personality measures do not contain one correct answer.
A distinct lack of objectivity is associated with self report.
Example: MMPI-2 (covered last week)
Uses a restricted response format, limited judgement required when scoring
How objective can these tests really be?
Projective Measures
Projective hypothesis: The idea that individual supplies structure to unstructured stimuli in a manner consistent with the individual’s own unique pattern of conscious and unconscious needs, fears, desires, impulses, conflicts, and ways of perceiving and responding.
Projective techniques are indirect methods of personality assessment.
Inkblots as projective stimuli
Rorschach inkblots – Psychodiagnostik, Hermann Rorschach (1921)
Debate around how to classify the Rorschach inkblots. Intended to measure a person’s personality characteristics and emotional functioning
Consists of 10 bilaterally symmetrical inkblots on separate cards (or plates), half which are achromatic (black and white).
Inkblots are initially presented in order from 1 to 10; test-takers are asked to interpret the inkblot and are provided a great deal of freedom.
No one Rorschach test!
Inkblots as projective stimuli
percept, third component…
After the entire set of inkblots has been administered, an inquiry is conducted and the assessor attempts to determine what features of the inkblot played a role in formulating the test-takers percept.
A third component, testing the limits, may be also included to enable the examiner to restructure the situation by asking specific questions concerning personality functioning.
Interpretation
Hypotheses concerning personality functioning are formed on the basis of variables such as content and location of the response, and the time taken to respond.
Rorschach protocols are scored according to several categories, including location, determinants, content, popularity, and form.
Patterns of response, recurring themes, and interrelationships among the different categories are all considered in the final description.
Validity and reliability of inkblots
John Exner Jr. developed a comprehensive system for administering, scoring, and interpreting the Rorschach inkblots.
–Exner’s system brought uniformity to Rorschach use, but despite the improvements, the psychometric properties of the Rorschach are still debated.
Test-retest reliability is of little value to the Rorschach because of the very nature of the measurement; inter-rater reliability may be a more appropriate.
Does it seem to actually predict anything?
Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
Christiana Morgan and Henry Murray (1953)
30 picture cards contain a variety of scenes that present the test-taker with “certain classical human situations”
The administering clinician selects the cards that are believed to elicit responses pertinent to the objective of testing.
Thematic apperception test
material used incudes
The material used in deriving conclusions includes:
The stories as they were told by the examinee
The clinician’s notes about the way or the manner in which the examinee responded
The clinicians notes about extra-test behaviour and verbalisations.
Interpretation (of tat)
Interpretive systems incorporate, or are based on Murray’s concepts of:
Need: Determinants of behaviour arising from within the individual.
Press: Determinants of behaviour arising from within the environment
Thema: Unit of interaction between needs and press.
Criticisms of the TAT
Lack of standardisation in administration, scoring, and interpretation procedures.
Highly susceptible to faking.
Test-taker’s responses may be affected by situational factors and transient internal need states.
Different TAT cards have different stimulus pulls.
The TAT cards have a negative or gloomy tone, which may restrict the range of affect projected by the test-taker.
TAT and self-report
Comparison of TAT-Derived Data and Self-Report Derived Data
McClelland et al. (1989).
-Argued that SR measures yielded self-attributed motives, whereas the TAT yielded implicit motives
-Implicit motives: Nonconscious influence on behaviour typically acquired on the basis of experience.
Apperceptive Personality test (APT)
Consists of eight stimulus cards that depict recognisable people in everyday situations that have an emotionally-neutral ambiance.
Introduces ‘objectivity’ into the measure by having test-takers respond to multiple-choice questions after they have “told their story”.
–This provides quantitative data to help fill in the information gaps from the stories that were too cryptic or brief when scoring.
Factor structure of the APT indicates a 3 factor model: positive evaluation, negative evaluation, and an “intensity” factor.
Other tests using pictures as projective stimuli
Hand Test – Edwin Wagner
Consists of nine cards with
pictures of hands on them and a tenth blank card.
Test-taker is asked what the hands on each card might be doing.
Hand test interpretation
Interpersonal responses: claim the hands are preparing for handshakes, offering comfort,
communicating by pointing or beckoning, or even pushing people away.
Environmental responses: include anything about the hand interacting with nonhuman objects. The responses can be about acquisition - grabbing or taking something - or more general actions like closing doors or gripping steering wheels.
Maladaptive responses: indicate distress of some kind. They can be responses that insist a fist is tensed to hold in anger or a hand is warding off a blow.
Withdrawal: which consists of people refusing to go along with the test. Withdrawing subjects often just describe the hand, rather than making up an idea for what it is doing, or going completely abstract.
Hand test interpretation
Wagner came up with a ratio, called the Acting Out Ratio; using the Hand Test score, provided an indication on how likely each subject was to act out violently.
Test weakness: No matter how ambiguous the hand gestures seem to the people drawing them, different cultures have different hand gestures – limits cross-cultural validity.
Rosenzweig picture-frustration study
Employs cartoons to depict frustrating situations.
Test-taker is asked to fill in the response of the cartoon figure being frustrated.
Picture-Frustration Interpretation
Responses are scored in terms of the type of reaction elicited and the direction of the aggression expressed.
Intropunitive: Aggression turned inward.
Extrapunitive: Outwardly expressed.
Inpunitive: Aggression is evaded so as to avoid or gloss over the situation.
Reactions are then grouped into categories:
Obstacle dominance-frustrating barrier
Ego defense – focused on protecting the person.
Need for persistence – problem solving.
Words as projective stimuli
Word association tests: Involve the presentation of a list of stimulus words.
- -Assessee is expected to respond with whatever comes to mind first upon exposure to the stimulus word.
- –Responses are analysed on the basis of content and other variables.
Work by Jung (1910), let to the Rapaport et al. (1945) WAT, which contained 60 items categorised into neutral (e.g., chair, water, dance) and traumatic (e.g., love, suicide, breast).
- –Normative data is provided regarding the percentage of occurrence of certain responses for college students and groups with schizophrenia.
- -For example, for the word “stomach”, 21% of the college group responded with “ache” and 13% with “ulcer”. 10% of the schizophrenia group responded with “ulcer”.
Words as projective stimuli
sentence completion,
Sentence completion test: Presentation of a list of words that begin a sentence
Assessee’s task is to respond by finishing each sentence with whatever words come to mind
I like to___________________________________________.
Someday, I will___________________________________ .
I will always remember the time ___________________.
I worry about _____________________________________.
I am most frightened when_______________________ .
My feelings are hurt______________________________ .
May be relatively atheoretical or linked closely to some theory
Sentence completion stems may be developed for use in specific settings or for specific purposes e.g. examining family, social and or sexual attitudes.
Production of figure drawings
Figure Drawing Test: Assessee produces a drawing that is analysed on the basis of it’s content and related variables.
–Characteristics of the drawing and the individual drawn are evaludated in the Draw a Person (DAP) test.
-Images are evaluated by length of time required to complete the picture, placement of the figures, the size of the figure, pencil pressure used, symmetry, line quality, shading, the presence of erasures, facial expressions, posture, clothing, and overall appearance.
–Clinicians will also ask follow-up questions about the drawn images. Responses are related to hypotheses and interpretations about personality functioning.
Figure drawings cont.
House-Tree-Person test – Test-taker’s task is to draw a picture of a house, a tree, and a person, the assumption is that when the subject is drawing they are projecting their inner world onto the page.
Kinetic Family Drawing (KFD) - test-taker draws a picture of his or her entire family, including themselves “doing something”. Helps learn about the examinee in relation to his/her family.
Critique and assumptions of Projective methods
ASSUMPTIONS
Assumptions
More ambiguous the stimuli, the more subjects reveal about their personality
Projective stimuli evoke responses that are idiosyncratic in nature
Ambiguous nature of a task and its results are less subject to faking
Critique and assumptions of Projective methods
CRITICISMS
Criticisms
Projective stimulus is only one aspect of the total stimulus situation
Stimulus material may not be as ambiguous and amenable to projection
Some assumptions are cherished beliefs accepted without the support of research validation
also see slide 41
Further assumptions
Every response provides meaning for personality analysis.
A relationship exists
between the strength of a need and it’s manifestation
on projective instruments.
Test-takers are unaware of what they are disclosing about themselves.
A projective protocol reflects sufficient data concerning personality functioning for formulation of judgements
There is a parallel between behaviour obtained on a projective instrument and behaviour displayed in social situations.