lecture 6 factor analysis Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is Intelligence?

Intelligence as defined by the lay public (Sternberg et al 1980s)

A

Reasons logically and well”, “reads widely”, “displays common sense”, “keeps an open mind”, “reads with high comprehension”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Differences between laypeople & experts:

A

Motivation & narrower (experts)

Interpersonal aspects & broader (lay people)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

laypersons & expert common factors

A

Common factors: problem-solving, verbal-ability, & social-competence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Intelligence as defined by the lay public (Seigler & Richards, 1980)

&intelligence in infants (lay def)

A

Developmental psychology students listed behaviours associated with intelligence in infancy, childhood, and adulthood.

Motor co-ordination
Awareness of people
Awareness of the environment
Verbal output

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Intelligence as defined by the lay public (Seigler & Richards, 1980) cont.

children and adults

A
Children
 Motor co-ordination
 Understanding
 Learning Ability
 Verbal Facility
Adults 
 Use of logic
 Problem solving
 Learning ability
 Verbal ability

lay construct changes over course of development
increase in “cognitive” component over time
verbal ability consistent, but developing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Intelligence as defined by children (Yussen & Kane, 1980)

A

Notions of intelligence emerge as early as first grade.
Younger children: tended to emphasise interpersonal skills
e.g., being nice, helpful, polite
Older Children: emphasised academic skills
e.g., reading well, doing well in class

Developmental progression in understanding of intelligence, differs from adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Intelligence as defined cross-culturally

A

Culture provides a model for thinking, acting, & feeling

Differing values -> different views of what constitutes intelligence
-Can differ in sub-cultures too

Greater emphasis on {{{social}}} aspects of intelligence in both African and Asian cultures compared to Western

Adults in Zambia (Serpell, 1974, 1996)
 Social responsibilities, 
 cooperativeness & 
 obedience
 Intelligent children expected 
 to be respectful to adults
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Taiwanese Chinese conceptions of intelligence (Yang & Steinberg, 1997)

A

(i) general cognitive factor
(ii) interpersonal intelligence
(iii) intrapersonal intelligence
(iii) intellectual self-assertion (knowing when to show you are smart)
(iv) intellectual self-effacement (knowing when to not show you are smart)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Summary of Lay Theories

A

Lay or everyday theories of intelligence reflect personal definitions and assumptions about IQ:
Structure
Underlying mechanisms
Developmental processes

That are affected by:
Age of person
Background
Culture

And that differ from expert theories
Constructed by
psychologists, empirically- tested and/or derived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intelligence as defined by the experts:

Galton (

A

1883): more intelligent = higher sensory abilities
Thus, advocated that tests of visual acuity or hearing ability are measurements of intelligence.

Galton developed many sensorimotor and perception-related tests by which he attempted to measure his definition of intelligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intelligence as defined by the experts

Binet

A

did not define explicitly, but described various components of intelligence, including reasoning, judgment, memory, and abstraction.

Criticised Galton’s approach & called for more complex measurements
Viewed intelligence as inseparable abilities that required complex measurements to determine.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intelligence as defined by the experts

Wechsler (1958) conceptualised intelligence as,

A

“the aggregate…capacity of the individual to act purposefully, to think rationally, and to deal effectively with his environment. It [is] composed of elements or abilities which…are qualitatively differentiable” (p. 7).

Advocated measuring several “qualitatively differentiable” abilities, which were verbal- or performance-based in nature.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intelligence as defined by the experts

Piaget

A

focused his research on the development of cognitive abilities in children (i.e., how children think, and how they understand themselves and the world around them).

Defined intelligence as an evolving biological adaptation to the outside world;
As a consequence of interaction with the environment, psychological structures become reorganised.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

General Definition of Intelligence

A

Intelligence: a multifaceted capacity that includes the abilities to:

  • Acquire and apply knowledge
  • Reason logically, plan effectively, and infer perceptively
  • Grasp and visualise concepts
  • Find the right words and thoughts with facility
  • Cope with and adjust to novel situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

General definition of interactionalism

A

complex concept by which heredity & environment are presumed to interact and influence the development of intelligence
Major theme in theories of Binet, Wechler, & Piaget.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Factor-analytic theories of intelligence do…..what?

A

focus on identifying the ability or groups of abilities deemed to constitute intelligence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

need to know the structure of intelligence in order to:

A

Need knowledge of structure of intelligence to:
devise appropriate measures
evaluate measures
ensure assessment covers construct sufficiently

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Factor Analysis

what is it?

A

Family of statistical techniques used to examine correlations among variables (items or tests)
-Used in theory validation
-Used in test construction and validation
Invented by Pearson in 1901
Further developed by Spearman in 1904
Applied by Spearman to cognitive abilities in 1927

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Factor Analysis part 2

simple vs complex

what does it do?

A

Simple theory is generally better than a complicated theory

Factor analysis helps us discover the smallest number of psychological dimensions (or factors) that can account for various behaviours, symptoms, and test scores we observe.

20
Q

2 Two main types

of factor analysis

A

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

21
Q

Exploratory Factor Analysis

A

Identifies or finds underlying dimensions/ clusters/ factors/ components in data, used for:

  • theory development (e.g., structure of personality)
  • test construction/ validation
22
Q

Types of Psychometric Questions

As related to EFA?

A

Personality
How many personality factors are there?
2, 3, 5, 16?
e.g., the “Big 5”? (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Openness, Conscientiousness)

Intelligence
Does intelligence consist of separate factors:
e.g., Verbal, Performance, Interpersonal, etc?
..or is it one global factor (“g”)?
…is it hierarchically structured?

23
Q

Exploratory Factor Analysis

what does it do

A

Summarises large amount of items or information into fewer scores

Based on correlations among items

Identifies clusters of highly correlated items

Common variance among items might reflect central underlying theme

Also identifies items that are not captured by these clusters

And items that are complex- fall equally into two or more different clusters

24
Q

Exploratory Factor Analysis
within factor correlations

factors represent?

A

Within-factor correlations will/should be higher than cross-factor correlations

Each factor represents items with “shared variance”

Each factor represents single relatively homogeneous underlying dimension

25
Q

Data Reduction with Factor Analysis

E.g., Questionnaire about child behaviour with hundreds of items

A
Instructions: On a scale of 1-5, compared to other children, my child…
gets into fights frequently at school
is defiant to adults
is very impulsive
has stomach aches frequently
is anxious about many things
appears sad much of the time
26
Q

example about child behaviour

A

slide 32 & 33

Look at the correlations between scales, which ones are correlated with each other?
How many factors does this suggest?

27
Q

Factor Loadings

A

Need to label factors meaningfully
Thoughts?
Factors correlate .46 -> higher order overall factor

28
Q

Correlations between Factors

A

Factors produced from items are called 1st order factors

A correlation matrix of factor scores can also be factor analysed to examine presence of 2nd order factors

Can also examine for 3rd order factor (global factor- e.g., overall ‘g’ in IQ)

Rare to go beyond that

29
Q

Factor Structure Example with 1st, 2nd, and 3rd Order Factors (BASC-II)

A

hyperactivity««

30
Q

Note

on neatness

A

Neatness is rare
Especially in EFA in test construction
May be left with items that don’t fit on a factor or that fit on multiple
Naming/interpreting factors can be hard!

31
Q

Confirmatory Factor Analysis

A

Confirmation Factor Analysis (CFA)
-Conducted after EFA with a different sample during test construction
-Evidence of validity (i.e.,
structural or factorial validity)
–Tests hypotheses about underlying structure of tests/items
—-i.e., tests if specified relationships / correlations exist in data

32
Q
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
part 2(whats it do)
A

Confirms structure suggested by EFA (or theory or literature)

E.g., EFA asks what is the underlying structure of personality items whereas CFA asks whether a 3-, 5-, or 6-factor structure of personality fits best
Model-testing function

33
Q

Factor Analysis and the Structure of Intelligence

(historical)/g

A

Factor analysis played a powerful role in shaping 20th Century developments in understanding of the structure of intelligence

Spearman – g factor (1903 +)
Based on extensive study of correlations between tests of intellectual and sensory ability

Proposed that intelligence consisted of two kinds of factors – general factor (g) and numerous specific factors (s1, s2, s3 etc).

34
Q

Factor Analysis and the Structure of Intelligence

part 2

A

Spearman argued examinee’s performance on any test was determined mainly by two influences (g and s)

Most interested in g and sought to study it
likened to ‘energy’ or ‘power’ – common in the whole brain

Proposed that some tests were heavily loaded with g factor

Although largely dismissed – idea of a general factor is still very much alive (dismissed?? wtf - listen to this part of lecture!)

35
Q

Two-Factor Theory of Intelligence (Spearman, 1927)

A

g represents the portion of variance that all intelligence tests have in common and the remaining portions of the variance being accounted for either by specific components (s) , or by error components (e) of this general factor.

36
Q

Multifactor Theories

PMA

What are the seven corroborated factors?

A

Thurstone (1931) – Primary Mental Abilities (PMA)
Concluded that several factors (not a single g) could best explain empirical results

Proposed approximately a dozen factors
Seven frequently corroborated:

Verbal comprehension, word fluency, number (mental arithmetic), space (mental rotation), associative memory (rote memory), perceptual speed, inductive reasoning

Developed a test (PMAT) to assess each of these factors – however acknowledged the inter- relationships between subtests
Later acknowledged underlying ‘g’ factor

37
Q

Vernon 1950 (multifactor theories)

A

Vernon (1950) – provided link between theories by Thurston and Spearman

Proposed a hierarchical group structure that included an over-arching factor (like “g”), two grouping factors (verbal/spatial abilities), and minor factors (like Thurston’s Primary Mental Factors) and specific factors (like Spearman’s “s”)

38
Q

Multifactor Theories - Cattal and Horn (40s-70s+)

A

Again used factor analysis to study the structure of intelligence – no single factor or group of factors – Two major factors:

Fluid Intelligence: largely non-verbal and culture reduced form of mental efficiency
Related to a person’s inherent capacity to learn and problem solve
Used when a person needs to adapt to a new situation

Crystallised Intelligence: highly culturally dependent and used for tasks that require a learned for habitual response
Acquired skills and knowledge
Related to formal and informal education

39
Q

Cattell’s original theory 1941 – 1965

A

g was “reflected” in Gf and Gc

Gf = fluid
Gc - crystalized

40
Q

Horn & Cattell’s Extended Gf-Gc Theory

A

Extended number of 2nd tier factors

But no g

41
Q

Full list broad factors included:
Ranked in order of strength of association with g

(10 factors)

A

Ranked in order of strength of association with g
“Gf” – fluid intelligence

“Gq” 	– quantitative knowledge

“Gc” 	– crystallised intelligence

“Grw” – reading and writing ability

“Gsm” – short-term memory

“Gv” 	– visual processing

“Ga” 	– auditory processing

“Glr” 	– long-term retrieval

“Gs” 	– processing speed

“CDS” 	– correct decision speed
42
Q

Bringing g back

John Carrol

A
John Carroll (1916- 2003)
Carroll reviewed all of the factor analytic research since Spearman

Re-analysed > 460 data sets (1500 references!)

Revised Cattell and Horn’s model to hierarchical 3-strata model

Main difference is inclusion of g as over-arching factor

43
Q

Three-Stratum Theory of Cognitive Abilities (Carroll, 1997)

A

The first stratum is g, followed by a level constituted of eight abilities and processes (e.g., Gf, Gc, general memory and learning (Y), and processing speed (T)), followed by a stratum containing varying “level factors” and “speed factors.”

44
Q

CHC Theory of Intelligence

(Kevin McGrew

A

Kevin McGrew (1997; Schneider & McGrew, 2012) integrated Cattell-Horn’s Gf-Gc Model and Carroll’s 3-strata model to produce the CHC Theory of Intelligence

The CHC Model integrates
the Cattell-Horn and Carroll models, featuring ten “broad-stratum” abilities and over seventy “narrow-stratum” abilities.
–Each broad-stratum ability subsumes two or more narrow-stratum abilities.

45
Q

chc theory part 2

added what factors, clustered what associated abilities?

A
Added Stratum II Broad Factors
‘Gkn’—domain specific knowledge 
‘Gps’—psychomotor speed 
‘Go’—olfactory abilities 
‘Gh’—tactile abilities 
‘Gk’—kinaesthetic abilities 
‘Gp’—psychomotor abilities

Clustered associated abilities

    • Domain-independent general abilities
    • Acquired knowledge systems
  • -Sensory-motor linked abilities
    • 74 Stratum I Specific abilities
46
Q

CHC Model
Part 3
what is used for, reffered to as?

A

CHC model is now accepted as the most-empirically supported working taxonomy of human cognitive abilities

Used to guide research into intelligence

Used as the basis for test development and assessment practice

Referred to as, “periodic table of human cognitive ability”