Week 1 - Zoom Class 1/16/2024 _ Capture Flashcards

1
Q

_________ _________ alone is insufficient to sustain an action for killing and keeping the fox.

A

Mere pursuit

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Pierson v. Post rule for capturing wild animals:
Achieving first possession, and thus ownership requires the following elements:
1. ?
2.
3.
4.

A
  1. Mortal wounding; and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Pierson v. Post rule for capturing wild animals:
Achieving first possession, and thus ownership requires the following elements:
1.
2. ?
3.
4.

A
  1. Not abandoning pursuit
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Pierson v. Post rule for capturing wild animals:
Achieving first possession, and thus ownership requires the following elements:
1.
2.
3. ?
4.

A
  1. With the intention of appropriating the animal to one’s own individual use, such that
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Pierson v. Post rule for capturing wild animals:
Achieving first possession, and thus ownership requires the following elements:
1.
2.
3.
4. ?

A

The hunter has deprived the animal of its natural liberty and brought it within his/her own control.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Pierson v. Post rule for capturing wild animals:
Achieving first possession, and thus ownership requires the following elements:
1.
2.
3.
4.

A
  1. Mortal wounding; and
  2. Not abandoning pursuit
  3. With the intention of appropriating the animal to one’s own individual use, such that
  4. The hunter has deprived the animal of its natural liberty and brought it within his/her control.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Whose land did the event occur on in Pierson v. Post?

A

Uninhabitated, unpossessed, wasteland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mere pursuit alone is insufficient to sustain an action for killing and keeping the fox. The Court seeks to prevent a “_____________________”.

A

Fertile source of quarrels and litigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

In the Whale case (Ghen v. Rich) - Custom in the industry prevails and the whale goes to the ___________ ______ ____________ it and not to the ___________.

A

Whaler who killed it
Finder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The whaling injustry would cease if the common truce customs were not adhered to and any chance finder could appropriate the _______ of the __________ _________.

A

Fruits
Whaler’s labor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why was whale hunter’s custom followed in Ghen, but fox hunter’s custom was not followed in Pierson?

A

The fox was being hunted for sport and the whale for business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A ______ is the _____ law equivalent the of a lawsuit.

A

Libel
Admiralty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How much would Ghen be entitled to rule:

A

The value of the whale minus processing costs plus interest from the date of conversion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If Green Peace interferes with whaling practices by putting it’s boat in between the whalers and the whales and the whale gets away. Following the rule from Pierson v. Post, would the Whaler prevail?

A

No, because the whale has not been mortally wounded, deprived of its natural liberty, brought it in your control, etc. and because you haven’t followed those steps you haven’t followed the rules from Pierson v. Post. The whaler would not win in that circumstance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Date of Conversion of the whale is?

A

The day that Ellis sold to Rich. The day that the whale stopped being available on the beach for Ghen to find and then had changed hands.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Duck Case - Keeble v. Hickeringill (H)
A cause of action did exist where H scared away the wildfowl ____________ to hunt Keeble’s __________ and not for any ___________ reason.

A

Maliciously
Business
Competitive

17
Q

The Duck Case. A cause of action did exist where H scared away the wildfowl maliciously to hunt Keeble’s business and not for any competitive reason. Court’s ruling is necessary to protect against _________ ___________ with a _____ or ________.

A

Malicious interference
Trade Or business

18
Q

A cause of action is?

A

A factual scenario that entitled you to relief in court.

19
Q

It is not okay to _____________ ____________ with someone’s ________ or _________. I can open my own business next door and __________with them all day long, but I cannot _________ __________.

A

Maliciously interfere
Trade or business
Compete
Maliciously interfere

20
Q

Keeble does have a cause of action: The Court says that if a man uses his ______ or ______ to take, sell, and dispose of the profit of wildfowl then that is his ________. If another man hinders him in his trade or livelihood there libel in an action for the hindrance.

A

Art or skill
Business

21
Q

Stand for the same basic principle that when the animals are on your land they are your animals. Subject to the right of the state you live in. The state may feel they have better rights to the animal on the back porch than you have, but as compared to other people that is my squirrel while it is in my yard.
1.
2.

A
  1. Constructive Possession
  2. Rationale Soli
22
Q

The idea that the ducks are Keeble’s ducks while they are on Keeble’s land:
1.
2.

A

Constructive Possession
Ratione Soli

23
Q

Want the actual deer back so they go to court seeking:

A

Replevin

24
Q

Example: Ghen v. Rich
They want the monetary value of the whale so they go to court seeking:

A

Trover