Week 1: The Scientific Method Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the scientific method?

A

An approach to acquiring knowledge that involves formulating specific questions and systematically finding answers. In other words, a method of acquiring knowledge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Identify the five main steps of the scientific method

A

1) Observe behaviour
2) Form a tentative hypothesis
3) Use hypothesis to make testable prediction
4) Evaluate the prediction by making systematic, planned observations
5) Use observations to support, refute, refine original hypothesis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is deductive reasoning/ deduction?

A

Uses a big, general statement about something to comment on a conclusion about a singular, specific example.
Think deductive = decrease.
E.g. All green apples are sour, therefore if I eat this green apple, it will be sour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is inductive reasoning /induction?

A

Involves using a relatively small set of specific observations to comment on a general, big statement about something.
Think inductive = increase
E.g. I ate three green apples and all were sour, therefore all green apples are sour.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What do we mean by ‘science’?

A

> Attempting to understand the world and its workings objectively.
Avoiding dogma/beliefs (we need evidence!)
Involves using error-detection mechanisms
Involves empiricism: idea that all knowledge is based on experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Identify the first six steps in the research process

A

1) Finding a research question
2) From theory to hypotheses
3) Defining & operationalising variables
4) Identifying participants and their characteristics
5) Research strategies (types of research)
6) Research designs (between/within subject etc)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does step three of the research process mean, “defining variables”?

A

It means you must define the construct you’re measuring.

e.g. report we did on courage, what IS courage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Difference btn subjects and participants?

A
Subjects = animals
Participants = humans
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘Select a research strategy’ is step five in the research process, what does this mean?

A

Decide between the five research strategies: descriptive, correlational, experimental, quasi-experimental, non-experimental designs. They all do different things.

Also consider internal and external validity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Step six, ‘select a research design’ refers to…

A

Decide between within, between subject, factorial or single-subject designs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Step one of research process ‘finding a research question’ involves two main parts. What are they?

A

Part 1) Select a general topic

Part 2) Do a literature review to find an unanswered q.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When choosing a research q you should choose something that (3 things)

A

Interests you
is practical/achievable/ethical
is in your long term interests (career goals)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is a hypothesis?

A

a statement that describes or explains the relationship btn variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Step two of the research process, ‘from theory to hypothesis’, involves deductive or inductive reasoning?

A

Deductive. Deducing conclusions from premises. Often called the “hypothetico-deductive method”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are three key characteristics of a fully sick hypothesis?

A

It should be…
• Testable: The hypothesis is stated in such a way so that the variables are observable,
assessable/measurable
• Refutable: The hypothesis is stated in such a way that it can be shown to be false
• Positive: The hypothesis should state that some state of affairs exists (directional/non-directional)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Whats a tip for operationalising variables?

A

Use already established measures e.g. beck depression

e.g. measuring intelligence = score on verbal SAT test (standardised test).

17
Q

What does operationalising variables mean? (Step three of research p)

A

A procedure for measuring & defining a construct.

􏰀Putting hypotheses into empirically testable form

18
Q

Question on identifying participants (step 4 in rp).

What does WIERDOs refer to and why is it related to sample bias.

A

WEIRDos—Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich & Democratic cultures

Idea that vast majority of studies have been done in these populations.

19
Q

When selecting a research strategy (Step 5 in rp), an important question to ask yourself is am I describing or explaining a relationship? Whats the difference?

A
Describing events (what is happening?)
• Describing relationships b/w variables
• e.g. is there a relationship b/w X & Y ?
• Prediction: does X predict Y ?
(more correlational)

Explaining events (why is it happening?)
• Attempting to infer causality
• e.g. does X cause changes in Y ?
(more experimental)

20
Q

Something confusing to keep in mind about the difference between causal and correlational research?

A
  • A causal relationship is a correlation of a certain kind

* Correlational research can serve as a basis for explanatory research

21
Q

What is a correlational research strategy?

A
DESCRIBES relationships 
>examines the relationship btn 2 or more variables, that exist naturally for a set of individuals. 
>Doesn't establish causality!
>Scatterplots
>Assess strength of relationship
>Directionality (positive/negative)
>Linear/non-linear relationships
example: there is a relationship between wake up times and gpa scores for students, but we dont know why.
22
Q

What is an experimental research strategy?

A

EXPLAINS relationships
• Attempting to infer causality
• Manipulating some aspect of a situation to see what influence it has on other variables
• Requires comparison with treatment conditions/control group
• Scientific control
• (eg. random allocation to groups)
Example: Increasing the amount of exercise causes a decrease in cholesterol levels.

23
Q

What are Extraneous variables?

A

all other variables in the study

24
Q

What’s the difference btn the experimental condition and control condition?

A
  • Experimental condition: receives IV (treatment); Levels of IV
  • Control condition: does not receive IV (comparison group)
25
Q

Difference between IV and DV?

A
  • Independent variable (IV): ‘manipulated’

* Dependent variable (DV): ‘measure’

26
Q

What are confounding variables?

A

Variables that may also influence the DV (besides IV)

27
Q

What is internal validity?

A

Internal validity: The extent to which the design of an experiment ensures that the IV, & not some other variable(s), causes the observed differences in the DV

28
Q

How do you ensure your experiment has good internal validity?
What is this process called?

A

Controlling for confounds.

Process called: scientific control (Controlling as many other variables that might influence the DV)

29
Q

Ecological validity?
External validity?

(basically same thing)

A

Ecological validity refers to the extent to which the findings of a research study are able to be generalized to real-life settings.
External: is the extent to which the results of a study can be generalized to other situations and to other people.

30
Q

What three designs can we have?

A
  • Between-group design: performance b/w two or more groups is compared
  • Within-groups design/Repeated- measures design: one group of participants is tested two or more times
  • Mixed designs
31
Q

What is a quasi experimental research strategy?

A

• Quasi-experimental: typically compares non-equivalent groups/conditions
• Pre-existing participant variables
• eg. Sex; smoker vs non-smoker
• Quasi-independent variable: the variable that differentiates the groups or conditions being compared; not manipulated
• eg. ‘The influence of sex differences on moral reasoning tasks’
ATTEMPTS to produce a cause and effect relationship BUT FALLS SHORT.

32
Q

What’s next after these six steps in the research process?

There are Four more steps (lecture conflates them/doesnt say them all).

A
.....
Step 7) conduct study 
Step 8) Evaluate the data
Step 9) Report the results
Step 10) Refine or reformulate your research idea (this never stops as research process is not linear! Spiral! Even if your hypothesis was right! Test the boundaries of the result).
33
Q

What is the end result/ implications of your research?

A
  • More confident?
  • Amend theory?
  • Discard theory?
34
Q

What is the scientist-practitioner model?

A

It promotes the importance of science in more applicable, practical fields. e.g. clinical psych

35
Q

Add a few more cards on other methods of research strategy like descriptive and non experimental. Important to know because assessable but not in lectures (reading 1.3, 1.4 and 6.1)

A

Will legit take ten minutes because ive marked whats important with pencil