Week #1 (test 1) Flashcards

1
Q

Define Deviance (primary and secondary)?

A

Deviance = non-conformity to a given set of norms that are accepted by a significant number of people in a society
> not necessarily criminal (ex. innovators are often defiant)

primary = a deviant act that remains marginal to identity (ex. stealing a slurpee)
secondary = when a label is applied, becoming identity (ex. becoming a thief)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are sanctions?

A

Any reaction that promotes conformity and discourages non-conformity to a norm
- includes positive rewards and negative punishment
- can be informal and formal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Outline the differences between law and justice

A

law: refers to sets of formal rules enforced by a government agency
- order and regulate behaviour
- subject to enactment, repeal, modification
- concrete, situated
*laws answer to the principle of justice and try to express something that is just

Justice: a concept based on ideals of fairness and morality
- equitable outcomes
- universal, normic, ordinate
- abstract, transcendent
*ensuring justice might require deviating from strict legal procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How do we define a crime?
What are the four conditions to be considered culpable?

A

It is an act or omission prohibited by criminal law, which is punishable
- requires and act and intent
- omissions include a failure to give assistance, to report, or take reasonable precautions (ex. criminal negligence) (intent is harder to demonstrate with an omission)

Culpable:
- legally responsible
- acting with intent
- acting without legal justification
- acting in violation of criminal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by the Social Construction of Crime
What is mala prohibita and mala in se

A
  • crimes are not inherently criminal, they are criminal because of society’s response to the behaviour
  • behaviours can be deemed criminal in one society but revered in another or at a different time
  • speaks to the difference between mala prohibita (wrong because it is prohibited) vs. mala in se (wrong in itself)
  • basically, we make our reality and build systems of law *not ALL random and relative though - some laws point to a higher idea of justice like protection of life and property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are moral entrepreneurs?

A

Individuals or groups who lobby for action against behaviours, advocate for legislative amendments, police mobilization, etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What years were the Cannabis Act (what was part of the reasons for the Cannabis Act), the Canada Temperance Act, and the Protection of Communities and Exploited Persons Act?

A

Cannabis Act = 2018
> majority of the population was consuming it, so how can we say this is a deviant criminal act with laws against it when the behaviour was actually becoming the norm
Canada Temperance Act = 1918-1920
Prostitution of Communities and Exploited Persons Act = 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

When was MAID legislation passed in Canada?
What is it?

A

2015-2016 and eligibility was expanded in 2021
MAID = allowing physicians to assist in the consensual death of another person
- MAID deaths have shot up considerably since 2016
- highest MAID usage in Quebec and BC
- lower rates in the prairies and Maritime provinces

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What forces potentially affect MAID usage?

A
  • variable application of policies
  • awareness
  • integration
  • autonomy (self-determination)
  • religious alignment or opposition
  • socio economic status
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define substantive and procedural canadian law

A

substantive: defines rights and obligations (ex. civil and criminal code)

procedural: legal processes that enforce the rights defined in substantive law (ex. constitutional, administrative, criminal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Canadian legal system is a ________ _____ system

A

common law
(except Quebec)
- it was imported to Canada in the 17th and 18th centuries

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does stare decisis mean? What kind of law is this?
What does Quebec use?

A

It is the principle whereby higher courts set precedents that lower courts follow - “to stand by what was decided”

Statute law:
- exists in both civil and criminal domains, appearing in the statutes themselves and in judicial precedent
- courts are organized as a hierarchy, with the SCC at the top
- judges are guided by past decisions - rules of precedent through case law
- precedent manages the imprecision in law by clarifying and guiding application

Quebec uses civil (Napoleonic) codes or statements of rules, followed by court decisions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the criminal law and civil law

A

Criminal law (aka public law) = body of rules and statutes that define prohibited conduct because it threatens/harm public safety and welfare
> establishes punishment and available penalties
> establishes rules that police and judges must follow
> contains substantive and procedural aspects (canada)

Civil law (aka private law) = regulates relationships among individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the Criminal Code (when was it made and how did it come into being)
What did the first criminal code include?

A

It is federal legislation that defines criminal law and procedures for the administration of justice
> first complete criminal code produced in 1892 under Sir John Thompson (minister of justice and later Canada’s fourth prime minister)

> Laws were previously defined at the provincial level
Confederation in 1867 resulted in a single criminal code : Prime Minister John A. Macdonald insisted on a single criminal law for the whole country
Included:
–> state responsible for proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
–> abolished death penalty for most offences
–> early release mechanisms (like probation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why was the criminal code needed / what was the intended purpose?

A
  • need for accessible laws in plain language
  • standardize definitions - resolve inconsistencies across provinces
  • provide clear grounds for prosecution
  • incorporated the values and principles of British common law
  • shaping Canadian identity - unification and nationalism
  • address pressing social issues like poverty
  • reduce the risk of personal retaliation and controlling vengeance
  • impose order, social control, and deterrence
  • protect group interests
  • a ‘living document’ - subject to revision and growth

*conflict perspective might say the purpose is to economically benefit certain groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the Rule of Law
- what was it based on

A

Means that no one is above the law, which has power in itself - all are bound and protected by law, equally enforced and standardized
- based on the English Magna Carta (1215) - set the principle that the king and his government weren’t above the law –> landowners and the king opposed the magna carta
- Separation of powers - Legislative (Senate, HOC), Executive (PM, Cabinet), Judicial (SCC and lower courts)

*key part of the foundation of the CJS

17
Q

What is the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

A
  • guarantees freedoms and rights (legal and equality) for citizens, including those accused, unless demonstrably justified
    > conscience, religion, thought, belief, expression, peaceful assembly, association, etc.
  • primary law of the land (influenced by the rule of law and Magna Carta)
    *key part of the foundation of the CJS
18
Q

What are the key principles of the Rule of Law?

A
  • presumption of innocence
  • action and intention as necessary ingredients
  • ignorance of the law is no excuse > law is known and accessible
  • no one is compelled to incriminate themselves - silence is an option in an adversarial system
  • can’t be tried twice for the same offence unless the crown successfully appeals
  • in criminal matters, the state (prosecutor) must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
  • in civil matters, liability is established on the balance of probabilities (reasonable belief)
  • open, independent, and impartial judiciary
  • no retrospective laws should be made
  • laws are made in an open and transparent way by the people
  • government agencies to behave as model litigants
  • fair and prompt trials
  • separation of powers between legislature, executive, and judiciary
  • people can only be punished in accordance with the law
  • the law and its administration are subject to open and free criticism
  • young persons (12-17) are subject to the criminal code, which is administered through a separate youth justice system
19
Q

What are some conflicting questions we can address/ask about the CJS?

A

Process and performance > do actors follow and administer documented procedures faithfully?

Reactive or Proactive? > can the system apply prevention and problem-solving
- are we asking the system to do too much?

Does the CJS address the causes of crime? > can private partnerships or other service providers help?

Failure and Success? > is the CJS always failing

20
Q

What is the problem with the JS being an evidence-based system

A

Evidence takes time to accumulate and things change

21
Q

What are examples of positive sanctions in the justice system?

A
  • getting pulled over for good driving
  • merits on driving licence
  • good behaviour in correction = serve less time
22
Q

What are some symbolisms from the Lady justice?

A
  • blindfolded = impartial/subjectivity
  • doubled edged-sword = truth
  • scale = trying to find balance and the fairest outcome
23
Q

Why are there differences in MAID across provinces? (class examples)

A
  • population and demographic differences
  • provincial medical culture - how MAID is communicated
  • religion (but Quebec ranks highest in religiosity?)
  • poverty / mental health
  • accessibility
  • birth rate declining - less children to take care of elderly
  • interpersonal connection and relationships (high density = low belonging?)
    > goffman –> in urban centres you have to show the right amount of inattention to the people around you (civil inattention)
24
Q

critical thinking also called _______ thinking

25
CJS is a _____ system, not preventative or problem-solving
reactive
26
Where did the laws against cannabis come from?
Came from a prominent woman who was a racist anti-drug crusader
27
In Quebec __% of all deaths in the province were doctor-assisted
7%
28
What are the two conflicting models/theories of the criminal law?
Value consensus model → assumes a consensus on what should be against the law - reflect’s society’s commonly held values → social cohesion Conflict model → rich and privileged have greater influence in law reform and the CJS
29
Examples of public law Examples of civil law
public: criminal law, constitutional law, administrative law, and taxation law civil: labour law, family law, tort law, property law, contract law
30
Explain how common law and civil law systems are different
Common law: - canada uses common law except for Quebec - Judges are guided by past decisions rather than legal codes or legislation - Originated in Europe - judges in royal courts → based on notion of precedent → decisions become rules that guide judges in making subsequent decisions Civil law: - Quebec uses this - Based on the French Code Napoleon - Judges first refer to the civil codes and then to previous court decisions
31
What are the primary sources of criminal law?
- legislation and judicial decisions - Historically, research has focused on the individual offender → recently, attention is focusing on the process through which laws are formulated and how we define certain things as criminal
32
Major differences between criminal law and civil law
civil law = disputes between individuals *no potential loss of liberty *Standard of proof: - criminal - beyond a reasonable doubt - civil - balance of probabilities - reasonable probability or belief = person may be guilty in civil court but not criminal court