Week 1: Introduction to Lifespan Theories of Health and Wellbeing Flashcards
How do we test our assumptions?
We all have our assumptions about the underlying causes of development: Nature vs nurture; active vs reactive; stability vs change; continuity vs discontinuity; universal vs context-specific (i.e., individual differences).
-Some theories emphasise one over the other and others emphasise both.
What is Lifespan Development?
-A consistent feature of developmental psychology has been the study of stability and change across the lifespan.
-Historically developmental psychology has focused on childhood and old age with relatively less on young adulthood and midlife (i.e., is understudied).
-Adulthood is seen as a period of psychological stability (psychologists believe not much happens so what’s the point of studying this area of age).
-Research typically examines health using age-specific cross-sectional studies (in the moment) rather than age-comparison or longitudinal designs (i.e., within-subjects)
However, development is a lifelong process:
-We cannot understand adult experiences without appreciating what came before in childhood and adolescence (Baltes & Graf, 1996).
-Transitions (changes) define and shape the life course of each person (Miller, 2010) e.g., taken then single, sudden unemployment etc.,
What is the lifespan perspective?
-‘Everything is developmental’ (Skinner et al., 2019)
-Lifespan psychology is an orientation rather than a theory.
The lifespan perspective aims to understand:
-How individuals change and develop throughout their lives (Cavanaugh & Blanchard-Fields, 2011).
-The factors influencing change, include biological, social, psychological, historical, and geographic factors (Hendricks, 2012).
The life-span perspective divides human development into two phases:
1. Early phase (childhood and adolescence, e.g. PSYC130): characterised by rapid age-related changes in people’s size and abilities e.g., language and cognitive development.
2. Later phase (young adulthood, middle age and old age, PSYC230): characterised by slower changes, but abilities continue to develop as people continue adapting to the environment (Baltes, Lindenberger, & Staudinger, 2006) e.g., educational transitions to dementia.
What do Lifespan Transitions represent?
-Lifespan transitions represent a range of psychological processes and movements.
Four forms (Zittoun, 2006):
1. Change in the cultural context (e.g. religiosity, faith)
2. Change of, or within, a person’s sphere of experience (e.g. having a baby)
3. Change in the relationships and interactions with objects and others (e.g. new romantic partner)
4. Change from within a person (e.g. chronic pain or illness)
Altogether a ring of experiences which cannot be disentangled.
-These different forms are not mutually exclusive.
-Some theorists view lifespan transitions as stressful; so-called ‘life stressors’ (Miller, 2010), but pathologising lifespan overlooks positive change e.g., protective factors.
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Lifespan Development?
Development is a lifelong process.
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Multidirectionality?
Development is multidimensional and can proceed in multiple directions (i.e., it’s not linear and fixed universally).
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What are Gains and Losses?
Development at every age involves both gains and losses. Losses can include cognitive decline where the more a person can compensate for this, the better the outcome.
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Plasticity?
Psychological development is ‘plastic’ and malleable.
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Historical embeddedness?
Development is shaped by history and culture.
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Contextualism?
Development is influenced by interactions among contexts. Different identity roles e.g., a teacher, then a son, then a father etc.,
Baltes’ (1987) key propositions of lifespan perspectives: What is Multidisciplinary?
Requires researchers from across natural and social sciences (different expertise needed).
How has age and health been viewed as static and dynamic?
-Life-span transitions elicit individual differences in health and wellbeing.
-Yet Psychology was slow to adopt a lifespan framework for studying health and illness (Whitman et al., 1999).
-Historically, health psychology viewed age as a static variable and took cross-sectional snapshots of health rather than a videotape that captures the ‘rich dynamics of change’ (Peterson, 1996).
Both health and age are dynamic:
-Ageing brings profound biological, cognitive, socioemotional, behavioural and environmental changes.
-A growing body of research examines how these changes, both normatively and abnormally, influence patterns of health and wellbeing.
What questions are generated when health and well-being are viewed from a lifespan perspective?
How do patterns of health and well-being vary across the lifespan?
For example:
-Why do I eat and drink more at Christmas than at other times of the year?
-Why do some new mothers develop postnatal depression whereas others don’t?
What are the direct relationships regarding age, time and health?
This includes consideration of individual differences in biological, psychological and social characteristics (differences in those resources and protective factors).
What are the indirect relationships regarding age, time and health?
Factors that determine health status across the lifespan, although sometimes similar, can also differ considerably depending on a person’s developmental status.
What are the Individual differences in health and well-being?
The mediating relationship between multidimensional risk factors, health status and age.
Which 4 interactive forces shape development throughout the life course, and what does this consist of? (Cavanaugh & Blanchard-Fields, 2015)
- Biological forces: Genetic and health-related factors.
- Psychological forces: Internal perceptual (how we perceive the world), cognitive (reasoning and executive functions), emotional and personality factors.
- Sociocultural forces: Interpersonal (relationships), societal (government, COVID, Climate change), cultural, and ethnic factors provide context.
- Life-cycle forces: Past experiences determine biological, psychological and sociocultural forces.
How does adopting a biopsychosocial framework organise these interactive forces?
-Each of us is the product of a unique combination of these forces.
-Expands our theoretical understanding of lifespan development from a purely psychological context to a model in which many different factors contribute to health and well-being (Miller, 2009).
Lifespan theories can be grouped into which 2 key approaches?
- Person-centred approach:
Stage theories (certain steps we have to go through in a certain order and time sequence) e.g. Erikson (1958), Peck (1968) also Freud! - Function-centred approach (how does it work holistically as a mechanism/contextually?) e.g., Bronfenbrenner (1979), Baltes (1987), Sameroff (2010).
Person-centred approach: What are Erikson’s (1958) psychosocial stages of development?
-Each stage of a person’s life requires the resolution of an ‘issue’ as part of that person’s ego development.
-Each stage consists of a crisis/conflict with alternative possibilities wherein the individual may move forward, backwards or remain stuck.
-Successful development: sameness and continuity between the self and the outer world.
-Maladjustment: break in the continuity of development, such as moving backwards or becoming stuck,
The way each person resolves these issues results in the acquisition of a ‘virtue’; an ego strength or special quality.
What’s involved in Erikson’s (1958) infancy stage of development? (birth to 2 years)
Ego development outcome:
-Trust vs mistrust (conflict)
Basic strength: drive and hope (outcome of overcoming conflict)
Outcome:
Trust is developed through reliable caregiving and affection. Mistrust develops when care is erratic and affection absent. Important event: feeding (window of how we trust/mistrust people)