week 1 (DNA experiments) Flashcards
Who lead to the discovery that genes are made of DNA? (1928)
Fred Griffith
What type of bacteria did Fred Griffith study in his experiments in 1928?
Streptococcus pneumoniae
What was the virulence of the bacterium (streptococcus pneumoniae) know to depend on?
A surrounding polysaccharide capsule that protects the bacterium from the body’s defence system.
What property does the polysaccharide capsule give bacterium?
Allowed them to produce smooth edged colonies on an agar surface
What was different about the rough edged colony of bacterium?
They were non encapsulated and non-lethal/avirulent
Why did Griffith conclude that live (R) bacteria was replaced or transformed by (S) bacteria.
- Mouse + (S) = Death
- Mouse + (R) = Survival
- Mouse + heat killed (S) = Survival
- Mouse + (S) + (R) = Death
Why was it concluded that the cell extract contained the transforming principle?
Living (S) cells appeared even when the heat-killed (S) culture in the mixture was replaced by a cell extract prepared from broken (S) cells, which had been freed from both intact cells and the capsular polysaccharide by centrifugation.
How did Oswald Avery determine the chemical nature of the transforming principle?
- Isolated DNA from (S) cells 2. Added the DNA to live (R) bacterial cultures 3. Allowed the mixture to incubate for a period of time then placed the samples on an agar surface and incubated them until colonies appeared
What did Avery discover about the colonies that appeared?
Some were (S) type
As some of the new colonies were (S) type, what did Avery do to show that this was permanent genetic change?
He dispersed many of the newly formed colonies and placed them on a second agar surface.
If the R colonies arising from the original mixture was dispersed, what happened? (S) colonies?
Only R bacteria grew in subsequent generations (S) colonies bred as true (S)
How did Avery provide evidence that transformation was caused by DNA not an impurity?
- Chemical analysis of samples containing the transforming principle showed that the major component was a deoxyribose containing nucleic acid
- Physical evidence showed that the sample contained a highly viscous substance having the properties of DNA
- Incubation with trypsin, chymotrypsin (enzymes that catalyse protein hydrolysis) or with ribonuclease (RNase) (a protein that catalyses RNA hydrolysis. This did not affect transforming activity thus is neither protein nor RNA
- Incubation with DNase (an enzyme that catalyses DNA hydrolysis), inactivated the transforming principle
The gene-as-protein theory posed 2 alternative explanations for the gene as protein results: Why could the first point be proved/ eliminated
- The transforming principle might not be DNA but instead one of the proteins contaminating the sample.
- DNA somehow affected capsule formation directly by acting in the metabolic pathway for biosynthesis of the polysaccharide and permanently altering this pathway. proved: DNase is not a pure enzyme eliminated: Original work showed insensitivity to proteolytic enzymes
What did Hotchkiss’ experiment prove?
Extensive purification ( a sample with only 0.02%) did not reduce transforming activity.
How did Hotchkiss prove that the transforming ability of DNA was not limited to capsule synthesis?
He transformed penicillin sensitive bacterial strain to penicillin resistance which is completely distinct from the rough/smooth character of the bacterial capsule